Crossing the Fossil Fuel Industry Could Now Get You Locked Up – For Decades

In the United States, people have the right to protest, and the press has the right to write about it. But over the past month, multiple journalists, documentary filmmakers, and activists have been arrested in three different states for engaging in and reporting on protests against fossil fuel infrastructure projects. While the arrests are concerning, many of the charges leveled at members of the press, particularly the documentarians, are excessive and clearly designed to send a message to other activists and members of the independent media who might cover the protests: Want to join them?

Earlier this month, Amy Goodman with Democracy Now! was charged with criminal trespass then — unbelievably — the more serious crime of rioting in North Dakota. State’s Attorney Ladd R. Erickson told the Grand Forks Herald that the charges were justified because he doesn’t consider Amy Goodman a journalist: "She's a protester, basically. Everything she reported on was from the position of justifying the protest actions."

Amy Goodman isn’t the only one. In September and October, four journalists with the independent news outfit Unicorn Riot were arrested for covering the Dakota Access oil pipeline protests in both North Dakota and Iowa. And nearly two weeks ago, documentarians Deia Schlosberg and Lindsey Goodwin-Grayzel were arrested in North Dakota and in Washington, respectively, for covering the #shutitdown action by five climate activists who temporarily shut down five pipelines carrying Canadian tar sands oil into the United States.

Amy Goodman’s charges were immediately rejected by a judge in North Dakota for lack of evidence, but Erickson hasn’t given up yet. The four Unicorn Riot journalists still face charges in Iowa and North Dakota. And, worst of all, Schlosberg faces up to 45 years in prison and a $50,000 fine in North Dakota, while Goodwin-Grayzel could face up to 30 years in prison and a $46,000 fine.

That’s 30 to 45 years in prison for their audacity to document a protest in the United States.

There’s little question that the severity of these charges are meant to send a chill down the spine of any journalist who dares cover the protests in ways the authorities and fossil fuel industry don’t like. But the worst punishment is reserved for those protesters who engage in nonviolent civil disobedience to call attention to the fossil fuel industry’s practices.

In North Dakota and Iowa, Native American activists, known as water protectors, fighting the Dakota Access pipeline are facing increasingly punitive charges and arrests as the local county sheriff’s offices get bolder. Despite the nonviolent nature of their actions, many indigenous water protectors are facing over-the-top charges that are clearly disproportionate to the actions taken against the pipeline. In one instance, 21 people were arrested during a ceremony planting willow and corn. Nine people have been charged with felonies for locking themselves to construction equipment used to construct the pipeline, and some of those charges have already been dismissed.  And just this past Saturday, 141 water protectors were arrested en masse even as some were trying to follow police orders to disperse.

Some of these arrests and charges seem to be happening not to address certain protester’s actions but to send an intimidating message to all environmental and indigenous protesters: Don’t cross the fossil fuel industry, or else.

The dramatic ramping up of charges against protesters came to a head on Tuesday, October 11, with the #shutitdown actions in Washington, North Dakota, Montana, and Minnesota. The five protesters who took part in shutting down the pipelines are now facing what the action’s organizers believe are the most severe charges ever for a nonviolent direct action. They are certainly the most severe charges any climate activist has faced in the modern climate movement, a movement that is defined and driven by dissent and protest.

Ken Ward is potentially facing up to 30 years in prison and a $46,000 fine for shutting down the TransMountain Pipeline in Skagit County, Washington. Emily Johnston and Annette Marie Klapstein could each face up to 21 years and a $41,000 fine for shutting down the Enbridge Lines 4 and 69 in Minnesota. Leonard Higgins could face up to ten years and a $50,000 fine for shutting down the Spectra Express Pipeline in Montana. And — in line with the state’s trend of ramping up of charges against climate activists —Michael Foster could be facing up to 81 years in prison and $94,500 in fines for shutting down TransCanada’s Keystone I pipeline in North Dakota.

No one was killed. No one was even hurt. Yet Foster could spend the rest of his life in prison.

The message being sent by these extreme charges is clearly directed at others who might consider protesting the fossil fuel industry and its infrastructure. And at a time when conversations around climate change and our role in it are more important than ever, that message is clearly meant to stifle the legitimate conversation around the role the industry plays.

Dissent and protest push the boundary of society’s comfort, particularly in the face of pressing and immediate issues the government doesn’t yet have the language to address — or won't address. There is no more important time to stand up and defend our right to dissent and our freedom of the press than when those rights and freedoms come under attack.

Our country needs dissent. And our country needs its journalists to highlight that dissent and bring to light the injustices perpetuated by unjust laws. Government suppression and intimidation of the climate movement must end now. 

View comments (28)
Read the Terms of Use

Katharine

Why aren't lawyer's doing probono case's for these folks! Even better question is, why is the state's attorney doing the oil companies dirty work? AND why is he allowed to abuse his power in office without consequences? Is he the judge of all who call themselves journalists or just the ones that don't cover what he wants public? Unbelievable arrogance! Wow

Anonymous

why hasn't prez. Obama step in and stop this prosess from proceeding they must be alternate routes that doesn't interfere with they drinking water why hasn't that been addressed how are they to survive without it lets get real this is a serios matter and Obama should call a halt to it before he leaves office these people have suffered enough been moved out for these rich oil companys who payoff these politician and get they vote

Myron Standing Bear

This type of treatment and abuse from law enforcement agencies is nothing new, it's been happening to the Native people since the beginning of court of law. prior, the Native was just killed and in many situations the murders got rewarded. I know that the scalp of the Native was valued based on sex and age, including the elderly and children. The perfect example is the arrest and charge of the Native lady named Red Fawn Fellows, is being charged with attempted murder and position of marijuana. I know that these charges are fraudulent and she will be in the same situation as our very own innocent Leonard Peltier. ...please pray for her.

Anonymous

The fossil fuel industry can go drop dead!!!
Curses on the Energy Transfer Partners mobster Kelcy Warren and the DAPL, along with governor of
N.D., and the Fascist pig cops!!!
May the oil-slicked infidels and their Nazi goon-squads
be cast into the fiery Abyss of Eternal Death!!!

Anonymous

The fossil fuel industry can kiss my a$$!!
I don't care if they burned me to the stake
for sorcery and witchcraft!!
I shall NEVER be silent!!!
I shall NEVER conform!!!
Water Is LIFE!!!
Fossil Fuel Is DEATH!!!

Gladwyn

Ride a bike, kill the pipe.

Calvin Tatsey

Until the first prosecutor, member of law enforcement, etc., is charged with false imprisonment, false arrest, etc., and find themselves facing the fines and years that the journalists are currently facing, these injustices will continue. Hold the corporations' puppets responsible!

GRIZZLE BEAR

What do I think? I'm not saying I or anyone else should, or would, do this; only pointing out to the Dakota Access Pipeline folks that if they continue to escalate their VIOLENCE against PEACEFUL protesters, they may arouse the interest of people not so peaceful. After all 1,172 miles of pipeline with nothing flowing yet is a tempting target for escalation to peaceful civil disobedience. A one inch titanium drill bit on a reconfigured battery operated manual posthole drill would do the trick; one or two holes with precise GPS location to verify the capability to disable the line. The potential of a determined opposition to create hundreds, or even thousands, of compromised sections over a thousand miles of pipe with relative ease; pipeline Dakota Access doesn’t dare use, with the potential to compromise the line faster than it can be repaired over distances impossible to defend. They might also consider pipe under land owned by sympathetic land owners forced by eminent domain to allow the line through their land. Right now you have a single point and peaceful protesters willing to negotiate an alternate route or design. I think Dakota Access should take a hard look at their strategy and what will happen if this goes bigger than their puny line of riot cops, Pinkertons, and a couple of armored cars. Arrogance and underestimating your opponent can be foolish..... Native Americans are well represented in the military, and many have the skills to accomplish this relatively simple operation. As I said, I am only speculating about what could happen when people insist on violence as the only arena in which they will negotiate. There are some badass folks out there being VERY patient and PEACEFUL. Dakota Access may want to consider a peaceful solution before some very intelligent and capable commandos decide to react in kind; there are different kinds of "rubber bullets" out there. JUST A WORD TO THE WISE....... YOU CAN'T PUMP OIL THROUGH A SIEVE.....

Pages

Stay Informed