The NFL’s ‘Anthem Policy’ Is Pure Hypocrisy

The NFL’s new “anthem policy” requires players to “respect” the flag and the national anthem or stay in the locker room until it is played. The NFL refers to this as a compromise — it was anything but. 

This was a mandate, not a decision arrived at through a collaborative process. Despite claiming that they would consult with the players before making a decision on this issue, the National Football League Players Association said, “The NFL chose to not consult the union in the development of this new ‘policy.’” So the league and owners will decide what shows “respect.”  

Kneeling is out. The Pittsburgh Steelers indicated that raising a fist or linking arms is out. If one team decides a gesture or posture is respectful but another team doesn’t like it, what will happen? One of the NFL officials actually said, “We will know it when we see it.”  

Tell the NFL: Don't Silence Your Players

Players who want to kneel (or raise a fist or link arms or do some other kind of gesture) are told, “If you do that on the field we will take money away from you.” This is simply a variation of an old, familiar theme. Don’t demonstrate in the street because you block my commute home. Don’t demonstrate downtown, I have shopping to do. Don’t demonstrate at a sporting event because you take away from my entertainment. Why can’t you all just shut up and dribble? 

Telling players to stay in the locker room also rings familiar as well — get to the back of the bus. Get to the other water fountain. Do not appear in public in ways that will threaten or displease white people in America. If you want to protest, do it in a way that white folks don’t have to see it or deal with your claimed injustices.  

And with the collusion to keep Colin Kaepernick out of the league combined with teams asking free agents if they will stand during the anthem, another message is being delivered. Be thankful you are making all that money — you play a game for a living. If we didn’t allow you to be making this money, you would be out there with the rest of “them.” 

President Donald Trump weighed in on players staying in the locker room saying, “Maybe you should not be in the country.” In a country that claims to value free speech and expression, you should be fined or forced to leave the country if you “speak” in a way some don’t like. Orwell would have loved it. 

John Elway and other NFL officials have said that we should “take the politics out of football.” Really? What about the millions of dollars paid to the NFL by the Department of Defense to promote the military? If encouraging people not to serve in the military is a political act, then encouraging them to serve is equally political. What about the show of military aircraft flying overhead and flags streaming across the field? Kneeling during the anthem has nothing to do with being for or against military recruiting, but the Pentagon paid for the NFL to promote the military — an overtly political act — and the NFL has been delivering. There is nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is. The NFL gave up being non-political a long time ago. 

The NFL said the new policy would change “a false perception among many that thousands of NFL players were unpatriotic.” Think about that for a minute. There was a false perception that players were unpatriotic, meaning the players kneeling were patriotic. The cure for this false perception is to force players to stand when they would prefer to kneel. By forcing them to stand, the fans will now know they are patriotic. This makes no sense. 

Only one team has said they will stop selling concessions during the anthem. It does not appear that the suspending the selling of beer, hotdogs, banners, and the like was even considered by the group. I guess it is not disrespectful to leave your seat and miss the anthem in order to get a dog and a beer. After all, there is money to be made. And no disrespect is shown by the fans at home who go to the bathroom, grab another beer, or set up the snacks during the anthem. The respect that must be shown must come from the players. 

Houston Texans owner Bob McNair told players last year, “You fellas need to ask your compadres, fellas, stop that other business, let’s go out and do something that really produces positive results, and we’ll help you.” Much has been made of the NFL setting aside money for social justice. The money was not new money to support communities, but re-allocating already designated charitable funds from one issue (breast cancer) to another (social justice). This is what caring means to an institution which was forecast to hit $14 billion in gross revenue last year. 

If people are serious about making a difference, they use whatever platform they have to make that clear. The NFL released its new policy at the same time news was breaking about NBA player Sterling Brown being abused and tased by officers of the Milwaukee Police Department. This is the kind of incident that started the protests. The NFL did not mention this incident in any of its messaging. Apparently speaking out about police abuse in the Black community isn’t something they are interested in during the offseason either. 

View comments (51)
Read the Terms of Use


I’d like to know this too. It seems like the players have a case.
Not to mention, due to the nature of the protest, and the comments made by Trump, you could argue the move by the NFL was racially motivated. Wouldn’t that go against the Civil labor Act of 1964?

Pam Mooneyham

Exactly my question Amy Rose.

Tom Joad

What makes this NFL stance even more outrageous is that they play their games in publicly financed stadiums. NFL owners are, as a group, the biggest Welfare Bums in the history of the U.S.A. The Welfare Bums run an extortion racket, threatening to move their team if the locals don't pay for the field. Now, the Welfare Bums declare that only political speech they approve of is permissible by their employees.


Indeed you are correct they are Welfare Bums of the highest order. Not unlike ALL other Corporate owners.

Now for all you ppl thinking you cannot protest at work. OK, but hopefully you do realize that these players aren't officially at work yet?

dave ku

However, these players are essentially protesting at work. It just so happens that their work is playing a game. They are not protesting on their own time. They are being paid to be there... to do a job. I think protesting at work, when not something organized like a union strike, falls in a completely different category. You sign a contract. You agree to the terms within, which includes proper behavior and attire while at work, and in the case of many sorts teams, esp. the NFL, you must agree to a moral clause as to not bring shame/ disgrace to the team when not on the field. If I refused to adhere to company policy, wardrobe, conduct, etc. after I agreed and signed a contract, I would be fired for breach of contract... freedom of speech or not.... i agreed to it and signed at the dotted line I would be nice to hear the ACLU's viewpoint from this perspective


Nobody looks at the big picture of where the REAL hypocrisy is in this whole situation. These players are protesting about violence against Blacks, but their whole profession as NFL athletes is all about violence against Blacks. Case in point, you have a Black quarterback who has possession of the football at the beginning of the play, a Black player from the opposing team rushes him, ASSAULTS him and takes his ball away, and then he RUNS with the ball, makes a touchdown and CELEBRATES by doing an end-zone dance, while the crowd CHEERS his actions. That is literally a promotion and celebration of Black-on-Black violence, and assault and battery . In fact the whole sport is about violence against the opposite team's players on the field. The NFL team players are out there before the game protesting violence against Blacks, but that is literally what they do as a part of their profession every single time they play !. If they want to protest about violence against Blacks then maybe they should take up a non-violent profession, like golf, instead.


Rather a stupid argument. The protest is about the murder of blacks by police. Football or boxing may be violent, but the participants are well paid and participate voluntarily. Likewise, taking a knee during the playing of the national anthem, does not affect their performance on the field. I doubt that their contracts have any requirements about not taking a knee, or at least those signed before Kaepernick became famous, and I fail to see the argument that an individual taking a knee creates a bad impression of the team. On the contrary, and in my opinion restricting a players rights impresses me negatively.

Eva Dolan

It is time to change our anthem. The lyrics, should you read them all, are not representative of the ideas we ought to have for our country.

2 Options might be:
Phil Oaks' 'The Power and the Glory'
Woody Guthrie's 'Tis Land is Your Land'

Just a suggestion....


Dr. Timothy Leary

My suggestion would be: John Phillip Souzas' "The Stars and Strips Forever".


Woody Guthrie, This Land Is My Land and with ALL the verses.


Stay Informed