Census Citizenship Question Illegally Discriminates Against Immigrants

For the first time since 1950, the census will ask respondents whether or not they are U.S. citizens. It may seem innocuous, but the addition of the question — in essence, a door-to-door government inquiry as to the citizenship status of every member of every household in the United States — will have far reaching consequences. It will dramatically reduce participation by immigrant communities, stunting their growing political influence and depriving them of economic benefits.

This is not an unintended side effect. It’s the reason the Trump administration sought to add the question, rejecting the advice of Census Bureau’s professional staff, its scientific advisory committee, and five previous census directors from both Republican and Democratic administrations.

Manipulating the census to discriminate against and disadvantage certain groups violates both the Fifth Amendment right to equal protection and the constitutional obligation that the census counts every living person in the United States, not just every citizen. The Trump administration must not be permitted to use the census as a tool to carry out its discriminatory designs — which is why the ACLU and partners have filed a federal lawsuit to block the question’s inclusion before it’s too late. 

The Trump administration has claimed that the Justice Department needs citizenship information in order to enforce the Voting Rights Act. Its pure pretext — the Voting Rights Act has been enforced by the government and private parties for over 50 years and during that time the Justice Department has never had access to individual level citizenship data. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has provided no explanation, let alone a detailed analysis, as to why gathering citizenship data through the census is suddenly necessary.

What the administration has done, however, is make its animus toward immigrant communities abundantly clear. Since taking office, President Trump has routinely denigrated immigrants — calling them “rapists,” “terrorists,” and asking “why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here,” and stating his preference for immigrants “from places like Norway.” His administration’s hostility is evident in a sweeping range of anti-immigrant policies, including the issuance of the Muslim ban, the rescission of DACA, the ending of temporary protected status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants who have resided in the United States for years, criminal prosecutions of asylum seekers, increased ICE raids and deportations, and the forced separation of immigrant children from their parents.

Like these policies, the citizenship question is specifically designed to harm immigrants and instill fear among their members. In fact, the Trump administration added the question with the full knowledge that Census Bureau personnel had recently issued specific warnings that Spanish-speakers, Arab-speakers, and Chinese-speakers, among others, were already expressing unprecedented levels of concern about participating in the census.

Lower response rates will be catastrophic for communities and states with large immigrant populations. As a result of an undercounting of their residents, states may lose seats in Congress and crucial federal funding that is tied to census results. The 2020 census data will also be used by states to draw congressional and state legislative districts. Depressing census response rates in already underrepresented communities will allow politicians to draw even more skewed legislative districts and further dilute the political power of these communities. That result plays directly into a longstanding Trump administration plan to exclude non-citizens when apportioning legislative districts as a way to further strip the political power of immigrant communities.

In fact, anti-immigrant crusader Kris Kobach, who publicly stated that he had proposed the idea of the citizenship question to Trump, made clear that the goal was “so Congress [can] consider excluding illegal aliens from the apportionment process.” This strategy has already proven successful. Following the addition of the citizenship question to the census, legislators in Missouri recently introduced a bill to amend its constitution to draw state legislative districts using only citizens, rather than total population. And the state of Alabama filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent counting undocumented immigrants when apportioning congressional seats.

If the citizenship question is permitted to stand, other states seeking to further this nativist agenda are likely to follow suit.

View comments (34)
Read the Terms of Use

Keith

The only thing that's made abundantly clear is the aclu's hatred for citizens. Illegal immigrants should not have any political power because they are not citizens.

Dr. Timothy Leary

Without the ACLU, Keith, you would be chained to the deck of galley rowing up the Mississippi River.

Anonymous

It does seem treasonous to help a group of uninvited foreigners seize political control so they can force their will over the objections of US Citizens.

Anonymous

This article does not make sense.
Illegal aliens should not count with respect to federal funding or legislative districts. They should have no representation in the government.
The only people who have anything fear when answering the census questions are illegal aliens. Hence there is NOTHING wrong with the question.

Dejesus

However you want to slice human beings appart , every tiny purchase made in this nation pays a tax. Every human goes to the store.

Anonymous

Unless the Constitution has changed. It requires a census of the population.

Article I, Section 2 requires counting the whole number of persons, not including Indians not taxed. It does not distinguish based on legal status.

Adding the question on its face is intended to be discriminatory and nothing else. You know it and I know it.

Tell The Truth

Unless the Constitution has been amended, it requires a census of the population. Article I, Section 2 requires counting the whole number of persons, not including Indians not taxed. It does not distinguish based on legal status.

Adding the question based on its face is intended to discriminate and nothing else. You know it and I know it.

Anonymous

It doesn't discrminate against immigrants. Immigrants have permission to be in the USA so they have no reason to fear answering the question. This case should be thrown out since you are fraudulently applying the term "immigrant" to bossy foreigners who sneaked in and are trying to force their will on US Citizens.

Anonymous

LEGAL immigrants have no problem with the question - only those here illegally. Those who are currently breaking laws SHOULD be worried about being caught and punished - and you should hope they do. You do not get to pick and choose which laws should be enforced and which should not be. Hubris, you have it.

INTJ

Legal immigrants have no reason to fear a question they must already answer in a number of other government interactions. It is difficult to imagine why someone who has taken the time and effort to obtain a visa from the government would be reticent to share that with the government. Illegal aliens, on the other hand, have no right, civil or otherwise, to be in the country, and should fear the authorities, as should anyone who has violated our borders and breaks federal law and commits fraud on a daily basis in order to stay.

Pages

Stay Informed