North Carolinians Voted to End Cooperation With Trump’s Deportation Force. ICE Retaliated.

President Trump’s Department of Homeland Security frequently claims to be motivated by a dedication to law and order, but its immigration enforcement tactics are often directly contrary to local communities’ legal and electoral choices.

Recent raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in North Carolina were a failed attempt to achieve by force what was soundly rejected at the ballot box last November: Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda. ICE targeted places and people based on democratic decisions North Carolina counties made about their policing resources and values, including upholding the Constitution.

Sweeping Change Across North Carolina

In the 2018 sheriffs’ elections in North Carolina, several long-term incumbents in Wake, Durham, Mecklenburg, Forsyth, and Henderson counties were defeated. Their successors ran — and won — on the promise of accountability to the diverse communities that they serve and against being part of Trump’s deportation force. This included the termination of 287(g) cooperation agreements with ICE that notify federal agents of the immigration status of detained individuals. Immediately, sheriffs began enacting the will of the people.

In North Carolina’s three most populous counties — Wake, Mecklenburg, and Durham — each newly elected sheriff publicly stated their intention to disentangle their local law enforcement work from federal immigration enforcement.

Sheriff Gary McFadden of Mecklenburg County and Sheriff Gerald Baker of Wake County both publicly ended their 287(g) programs, joining other major cities’ counties like Harris (Houston) and Los Angeles in considering 287(g) to be harmful to community policing by frightening residents and an unjustified subsidy of federal immigration enforcement by local budgets that have other public safety priorities. Law enforcement leaders such as the Major Cities Chiefs Association say that entangling federal immigration enforcement with state and local policing, as 287(g) does, is mistaken.

In the months since their elections, sheriffs in Forsyth and Henderson counties have now both also made statements about their interest in disentangling from their relationships with ICE. Sheriff Lowell Griffin in Henderson County has stated that their 287(g) program, set to expire at the end February, drains his office of essential financial resources, although it remains to be seen if he will renew the program despite the financial losses incurred by his office.

In Forsyth County, Sheriff Bobby Kimbrough has stated that he will no longer honor ICE detainer requests and will require a judicial warrant: “We will not be an extension of immigrant investigations.” He also expressed concern saying, “Basically, I’m detaining somebody’s Fourth Amendment right without due process.”

ICE’s Retaliatory Detention Rampage in North Carolina

ICE engaged in a five-day statewide operation in North Carolina starting Feb. 5. ICE targeted the three counties — Wake, Durham, and Mecklenburg — where sheriffs have publicly ended their collaboration with ICE.

The operation resulted in the detention of over 200 immigrants and was admittedly haphazard in nature, resulting in ICE detaining at least 60 immigrants who were not targets of ICE immigration enforcement, but were simply in the “wrong place at the wrong time.”

In defending the raids, ICE officials directed their ire at local law enforcement for ending collaboration with ICE. ICE Field Office Director Sean Gallagher named “the dangerous policies of not cooperating with ICE,” as the impetus for the operation.

Gallagher went so far as to confirm the indiscriminate detention of immigrants that are not ICE priorities for immigration enforcement, saying, “If these [287(g)] programs would be in place, I wouldn’t have to put so many officers on the street [...] and you would have less people — like you were talking about — workers going to work that would be arrested. Absolutely.”

Sheriffs upholding the Constitution are refusing to break the law, not declining to enforce it. But ICE Southern Region Communications Director Bryan Cox was intentionally misleading in alleging a lack of cooperation. He said, “The reality is now given that the Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Department will no longer cooperate with ICE, ICE has no choice but to send its officers into the community, into neighborhoods, into workplaces to make those same arrests.” ICE is aware of every person booked into these jails through fingerprint sharing: If they want to detain someone, all that’s needed — like from every other law enforcement agency — is a warrant that’s independently issued by a judge and supported by the Constitution’s probable cause requirement.

Fighting Back: North Carolinians Are Standing Firm

In the wake of ICE’s coercive and retaliatory operations across North Carolina, community groups are taking up the important work of rapid response and community building. Groups like Siembra NC, Familia Si, 287(g) No, CIMA, Comunidad Colectiva, Comite Popular Somos Raleigh, and Comite de Accion Popular are mobilizing with allies to support sheriffs who protect their residents’ rights and put serving their communities first.

We support this broad coalition, which includes faith-based and nonprofit organizations, and call on Gov. Roy Cooper to condemn the retaliatory ICE operation in North Carolina. We also call on ICE to be transparent and report publicly about how, where, and why each individual was detained during the operation. North Carolinians voted last November for community policing and respecting the Fourth Amendment, and ICE’s scare tactics won’t roll back our progress.

View comments (29)
Read the Terms of Use

Ms. Gloria Anasyrma

Everybody knows that North Carolina is one of the states taken over by "undocumented aliens" and the American people there are too laid back to do anything about it.

Anonymous

Actually, we're not laid back at all. We are fighting against people like you who are too outspoken in your prejudice beliefs.

Anonymous

Who is we? Do you have a turd in your pocket?

Mark Noonan

Talk about the Brown Shirts Of Old.

Anonymous

Great answer. They were later merged under the main executions boss.

Anonymous

Anyone with any authority over any person takes a supreme (and superseding) loyalty oath to protect the constitutional rights of every person (citizen and non-citizen) physically within their legal jurisdiction. Contrary to popular belief, “non-citizens” have some constitutional rights and legal protections. Federal officials have never had the legal authority to violate constitutional rights. This legally binding loyalty oath applies to local, state and federal officials/contractors under Article VI of the United States Constitution.

Anonymous

I have a question so it ok for illegal aliens to break the USA laws and get away with it? When American citizens and children break the they have to pay for their acts? What the difference between these two groups of people?why do we have laws in America if one group of break them and get away with it and other group people have pay with their freedom? Why should the American taxpayers have to support their anchor babies with CHIP, WELFARE and Food STAMPS? What about American citizens and children who need are help first. I am so tried of my taxpayer dollars going to them. As American citizen my wages are not going up only down because of them. If you are a hear legally you have no problems but if you are are illegally then you should worry. DEPORTED all illegal aliens back to their own countries and they should take their anchor kids with them.

Anonymous

The investigative journalism show “Frontline” reported a few years ago that Florida farmers were raping undocumented female farm workers. Apparently the farmers thought since the women were not citizens they had no rights and no protections under law. The farmers went to prison. The 14th Amendment (equal protection under law) protects all persons on U.S. soil and U.S. controlled territories. What about a tourist visiting the United States? The laws and Constitution protect them also. To your question directly: if an immigrant is apprehended in a criminal act or there is probable cause evidence of a past crime (obtain a warrant) that is legitimate enforcement. Pulling over a driver with dark hair and dark skin - profiling - is not legal. There has to be real evidence of a past crime.

Anonymous

Federal officials have never had the legal authority to violate constitutional rights, so isn't that why they subcontract it out? Federal or administration officials can wash their hands of any violations just by writing that into the contract, and having it held above review through executive direction, and who knows maybe national security. Why not, does it have to be true with Trump people?

Anonymous

Those illegal aliens women are getting rape while coming across South America and Mexico. They are being sex trafficking. They know the risks

Pages

Stay Informed