The Supreme Court Failed Us

Tuesday is a dark day for American jurisprudence and the values we hold dear as a nation. In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump’s travel ban. Under the false guise of protecting national security, the justices sanctioned a policy that targets people because of their religion.

The ruling is an example of what happens when the government bases a policy on prejudice and bigotry and the court fails to stop it. 

As children, Americans are taught that the role of the Supreme Court is to check the power of the president and Congress. It is supposed to defend the Constitution and stay above politics and bitter partisanship. This duty is especially important at a time when an autocratic president is attacking our basic norms and institutions.

Sadly, in issuing this decision, the court abdicated that responsibility. The five justices ruling in the majority performed a routine of judicial acrobatics to construct a legal argument sanctioning religious discrimination.

During his campaign, Trump called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslimsentering the United States.” He made good on that promise during his first days in office with an executive order that banned people from seven predominantly Muslim countries. He then adjusted the list of nations subject to his ban as several courts repudiated his order as unconstitutional. The current ban — applying to five Muslim-majority nations and North Korea and Venezuela — is no less the result of anti-religious animus than the previous bans.

As Justice Sonia Sotomayor points out in Tuesday’s opinion, the Supreme Court failed to heed evidence that “a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus.” Instead of applying the reasonable person standard, political affiliation seemed to carry the day with the five Republican-appointed justices.

In the days before the decision, the ACLU commissioned a poll to find out what a reasonable observer might think. Seventy-seven percent of Democrats surveyed said they believed it was a Muslim ban, while 69 percent of Republicans said it was not.

Sadly, the Supreme Court vote broke down the same way. The justices appointed by Democratic presidents saw a Muslim ban. The justices appointed by Republicans did not. Even Sotomayor laments the decision’s impact on the stature and standing of the Supreme Court: “Our Constitution demands, and our country deserves, a judiciary willing to hold the coordinate branches to account when they defy our most sacred legal commitments.”

The Supreme Court missed a historic opportunity to rise above partisan politics and to say constitutional principles must be upheld, notwithstanding the Kabuki theater of partisan politics or White House pundits. In the Muslim ban, there are core principles — equality under the law and freedom of religion — that are so central to American democracy that one would hope that all Americans regardless of party affiliation would unflinchingly reject such discrimination. Tuesday is not that day. Let us hope that better days are ahead of us — for the Supreme Court and for the nation.

This article was originally published at USA Today

View comments (21)
Read the Terms of Use


Trump ran on a platform of creating ethnic divides and this travel ban is nothing more than that. The vast majority of terrorist attacks in the US are by American white dudes. This travel ban is just pandering to xenophobia and bigotry. It is thinly veiled and I don't believe you are that dumb to believe it's to protect US soil.


Please tell me you're joking.


Sean is 100% correct!! Trump's statements are irrelevant. Please provide example of how person A is discriminated against because of their religion if they are form one of the country's listed.

Can you honestly say that person A is discriminated against and person B is not if both are from one of the countries listed because of their religion? NO

If this ban is trump's attempt at muslim ban he failed miserably!!!


Your defense can't rely on reading the inner thoughts of someone else. Mind reading isn't a thing.


Well, since they're basically already dressed the part they'll be playing, all they'll need to do is change into white robes with hoods...


After Oklahoma City, don't remember the U.S. government stereotyping Baptists and Pentecostals as domestic terrorists!




Stop with the lies. This ban is NOT religious discrimination!!!

If it is, please explain how (under this ban) an individual can be discriminated against because of their religion? I you come back with 'majority muslim' country BS; you are being intellectually dishonest and lazy. Every country is 'majority ______' (fill in the blank); your logic prevents action of any kind against any country; else you be accused of discriminating against ________.


great job keeping those muslims out trump...not!!!
Around 62% of the world's Muslims live in the Asia-Pacific region (from Turkey to Indonesia), with over 1 billion adherents. The largest Muslim population in a country is in Indonesia, a nation home to 12.7% of the world's Muslims, followed by Pakistan (11.0%), and India (10.9%).


Hey, all you great and wise lawyers at the ACLU, isn't there a law on the books from 1952 banning muslums from this country or have you conveniently ignored this law to further your own agenda?


Stay Informed