Blood Donation Ban for Gay and Bisexual Men Under Review by HHS

Late last week, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided an important status update about ongoing research studies examining the lifetime ban on blood donations from men who have ever had sex with other men since 1977.

Gay and bisexual men, intravenous drug users, people who have had sex for money and people who have tested positive for HIV disease are currently the only groups of people banned from donating blood. Gay and bisexual men are excluded regardless of their individual sexual histories or HIV risk. Despite the lifetime ban on blood donations from gay and bisexual men, other individuals who are also at increased risk for HIV disease, including people who have heterosexual sex with someone who they know to be living with HIV or people who have had sex with a commercial sex worker, are prevented from donating blood for only one year.

Last year, the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability called the current lifetime ban for gay and bisexual men “suboptimal.” In response to the recommendations HHS received from the Advisory Committee, Dr. Howard Koh, Assistant Secretary for Health, tasked the HHS Blood, Organ and Tissue Safety Working Group with developing a plan of action, including the current studies, which will allow for further review and re-evaluation of the lifetime ban.

In announcing its progress report last week, HHS stated:

When these studies are complete, the Department is committed to a full evidence-based evaluation of the policy. If the data indicate that a change is possible while protecting the blood supply, we will consider a change to the policy.

Because current policy establishes different standards for behaviors that pose similar (or greater) risk of HIV transmission, it has been criticized, not unfairly, as stigmatizing and discriminatory to gay and bisexual men. 

The ACLU has long argued that policy in this area must be grounded in actual scientific evidence, rather than dated stereotypes and assumptions. While there is no constitutional right to donate blood, government policy regulating the blood donation field must not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation by adopting differing standards for conduct that poses similar risks, based solely on the identity of those engaging in such conduct.

The Obama administration has made commendable progress in updating policies impacting those living with HIV and AIDS to ensure they are based on sound science and not discriminatory stereotypes that originated in a time when ignorance and fear about HIV/AIDS, and those living with the disease, ran wild. Within its first year in office, the administration brought an end to the 22-year-old travel ban that barred anyone with HIV or AIDS from entering the country. President Obama said the ban was “rooted in fear rather than fact.”

Here’s hoping science once again carries the day.

Learn more about HIV/AIDS discrimination: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (2)
Read the Terms of Use

Mister Cooney

Lift the Ban and we will stamp out shortages and save lives.
Healthy gay and bisexual men are banned for life per outdated, last-century FDA regulations that no one has bothered to update. Even worse, the regulation makes no sense, the FDA allows a man who has had sex with an HIV-positive woman to give blood after waiting only one year!
Our current policies turn away healthy, willing donors, even as we face serious shortages. This essentially is enforcing a death penalty to those Americans whose lives hang in the balance. As reported in a recent UCLA study, they found that lifting the ban could provide an additional 219,000 pints of much-needed blood and 900 additional organ donations each year. That's many lives that can be saved if we end this ridiculous ban on healthy people. How many lives have and will be lost in the meantime?


Now i'm lgbt and have and from a medical bauknrocgd, it is far far easier to contract HIV when having anal sex as the walls of the intestine tair easily. Now this applies to heterosexual intercourse and homosexual intercourse. Now homosexual intercourse being primarily what it is, there are far higher chances of getting HIV but it is definetely not a gay disease and is more prominent in the heterosexual community

Sign Up for Breaking News