Texas Judge Lanny Moriarity's decision to "make of an example" of 17-year old honor student Diane Tran succeeds only in highlighting the insensitive and counterproductive treatment of Texas juveniles in the state's criminal justice system. Judge Moriarty fined Diane and sentenced her to spend 24 hours in jail with adults charged with serious criminal offenses. The crime? Truancy. Tran is a straight-A student taking difficult college courses and missed classes because she has been working two jobs to help support a family torn apart by divorce and her mother's abandonment. Tran should, in fact, be made an example of, but not because of the number of school days she missed; Tran exemplifies the triumph of determination and hard work over serious adversity.

As a teacher, I’ve learned that students’ home lives will inevitably spill over into the classroom and effect the learning environment. This is not to say that students who experience external trauma or have unstable lives will always act out, or that they should receive a pass if they do. What this means is that educators, on all levels, have to be understanding of their students’ individual needs. They need to show discretion when determining appropriate discipline. Students should not be prematurely and unnecessarily exposed to the criminal justice system for minor, correctable offenses; this nationwide phenomenon known as the “school to prison pipeline” pushes students out of school as a result of disproportionate disciplinary action and into the criminal justice system. The intuitive response to a student missing school should be to find a way to get them back, not criminalize them. However, Texas’ punitive rule, like so many other states across the nation, leaves no room to consider the individual experiences of students that might contribute to their erratic attendance. Nor does it provide alternative services to ensure that students are able to take full advantage of their educations.

Tran’s case has garnered widespread national media attention and people have even taken up collections to pay her fine, raising nearly $28,000. Petitions with more than 26,000 signatures have been circulated in communities across the country, and the general consensus is shock and disgust over this illustration of misappropriated justice. While what happened to Diane is tragic and should not be taken lightly, the true travesty is that these unnecessary jailings happen regularly. The ACLU recently settled a case on behalf of high school students in southeast Texas who were unjustly jailed in 2010, each for over a week because of accrued truancy fines. It is not enough to revoke the punishment of a single model student. There must be widespread reform in the educational community to ensure that children are not criminalized and pushed out of the very institutions that should be shaping them for success.

Learn more about racial justice: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (3)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

Isn't the school leaving age in Texas 17? How can a 17-year-old be charged for truancy at all?

Name...

In Taiwan, students can flunk from lack of attendance, but prison is really extreme. Flunking is punishment enough.

Anonymous

My son dropped out of school because he couldn't handle the pressure and the school was happy to let him go after his truancy didn't qualify for him to take credit for his classes that semester. He has ADD and was in the Fort Bend County Districts special ed program since he was in 2nd grade and on top of that all of the special ed "support" at Dulles High School knew that on top of all of that there were serious problems at home and was going through a horrible time dealing with it. The next year my son reenrolled back into school to graduate after having already dropping out the previous year. The school said that had NEVER HAPPENED before and didn't try to give him any support for him doing that. But even though he has graduated (2011), the court now expects us TO PAY $800+ after he graduated and is out of school. They said that he can't even talk to the judge until he pays the $800 FIRST and then the judge will see us but has the right to decide one way or another if they will drop the charges and REFUND us back the $800! There's is so much more and even worse in justices ....

Stay Informed