November Could be Consequential for Transgender and Nonbinary People Like Me

UPDATE (11/05/2018): Massachusetts votes to preserve a law that prohibits discrimination against transgender people in public accommodations.

On November 6, votes cast in states and communities around the country could have a dramatic impact on the dignity, safety, and lives of transgender and nonbinary people.

Nowhere is this more clear than in Massachusetts. Question 3 is a referendum on a nondiscrimination law passed by a bipartisan supermajority and signed by Republican Governor Charlie Baker in 2016. A “yes” vote would keep the law, which prohibits discrimination against transgender people in public accommodations. This includes parks, bathrooms, gyms, restaurants, and hospitals — anywhere that isn’t a person’s work, home, or school. A “no” vote says that discrimination against transgender people is acceptable.

Without the nondiscrimination law, transgender and nonbinary people could be turned away from restaurants, stores and businesses, just because of who they are.

We have seen this at the municipal level before, but this is the first time a law explicitly prohibiting gender identity discrimination is being put to a statewide vote. It should be the last, but if we lose, we are likely to see similar attacks on existing protections for LGBTQ people throughout the country.

Since Obergefell, opponents of equality have turned their efforts toward blocking protections for transgender people, using the same fear mongering tactics — like railing against “predatory men in dresses” — they have used against the LGBTQ community in schools and legislatures for decades. Our opponents claim that acknowledging the dignity of a transgender person by allowing them equal access to our public spaces will make the world less safe — a widely disproven myth.

This fear makes me inclined, as a nonbinary person, to dodge issues relating to my identity — like gender neutral pronouns. But sometimes that’s not an option. No matter what bathroom I go into, for example, I risk harassment. Once, I walked into a women’s room and a woman at the sink told me I was in the wrong bathroom. She followed me to the stall, and waited outside while telling me she was going to call the manager. I was terrified and embarrassed.

Despite being proudly nonbinary and doing trans advocacy work professionally, I was keenly aware that I had violated gender norms and was paying the price. Like so many transgender people, all I could think about was my safety.

Nondiscrimination laws, like the ones that currently exist in Massachusetts, demonstrate that a state and its residents value the dignity, safety, and humanity of all people. No one should be turned away from places open to the public simply because of their gender expression.

I didn’t speak out in that moment, but I’m doing so now. We know that the best way to defeat our opponents’ lies is to familiarize people with our transgender family, friends, and coworkers. That’s how we won in Anchorage, when the community defeated an anti-transgender ballot measure earlier this year. And that’s what we’ve been doing in Massachusetts.

Throughout this campaign, I’ve told the story of that bathroom experience at voters’ front doors and on the phones. When we talk to them about the reality many transgender and gender nonconforming people experience, they understand that this law has made Massachusetts a better and safer place for everyone. They want their transgender friends, neighbors, and loved ones to have the same basic protections they enjoy.

Join ACLU volunteers at a campaign event

In addition to Massachusetts, ACLU voters in every state have the opportunity to vote for equality for trans and nonbinary people. In recent years, we’ve seen more school boards move to protect all students’ right to learn by ensuring that transgender and nonbinary students have equal access to restrooms, locker rooms, and school activities. At the federal level, the Equality Act would fill significant gaps in legal protections, guaranteeing explicit and comprehensive nondiscrimination for LGBTQ people nationwide, as well as updating protections for women and people of color. House and Senate candidates should be asked if they stand with the 70 percent of Americans who support such protections.

Despite our opponents’ attempts to reduce transgender equality to a matter of restroom access, we know it’s about so much more. This is about treating everyone fairly. It’s about dignity and respect. I hope Massachusetts voters remember that when casting their ballots on November 6.


Every day across the nation, the ACLU is called on to defend all the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. There's never been a more important time to support the ACLU and our effective work to protect civil liberties. If you like what you just read, help us continue to speak freely by donating today.

View comments (10)
Read the Terms of Use

Dr. Timothy Leary

I am starting my own political movement the Cisgender Crusade. We are going to put all you LGBTQ people back in the closet where you belong.

Amy Garrison

Oh look, a bigoted, closed-minded, homophobic, transphobic, troll. Now that we know your full name, we all know a doctor we don’t ever want to deal with professionally or in any other capacity.

Anonymous

Amy, you forgot to mention that Dr Leary is a bit trippy....

Dr. Timothy Leary

Thank you for your replies. We will now put both of you on the closet floor under a pair of wet, muddy, gouloshes.

High School Student

Hey, Doc, did you know that "gouloshes" isn't a word? You either meant "galoshes" or "goulash" (which is a soup, so that makes no sense whatsoever).

Anonymous

Okay. I'll go on the closet. Your closet. Your shoes and jackets are delicious.

Patrick M Townsend

WHY should WE be "In The Closet"? WHY are WE NOT ALLOWED to be PROUD of who we ARE JUST as ANY Straight Person IS?? You Straight Men go out and "Cat Call" at Women in Bars and Night Clubs ALL THE TIME!! Do you see US complaining about THAT just because WE DON'T "Align with your Beliefs"???? Don't YOU think THAT INSULTS Women??? And,it's NOT A "Choice", because if it WAS, I could JUST as EASILY make the "Choice" to be Straight, but I CAN'T, because that's NOT who i'm NATURALLY "Attracted To"!!!! TRY considering things "From ALL Angles" BEFORE you open your BIG MOUTH "Neanderthal"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND, BTW, I happen to LOVE "Straight People" because it's y'all that MAKE MORE OF US!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous

I think we are going to lose. This country has become so transphobic. Hence, the comments seen here..

Anonymous

The fact that this is even up for debate disgusts me. LGBTQ+ people belong right where everyone else does — in the world, free, and LEFT ALONE. We have done nothing except, as some might argue, exist. Some might think our existence is offensive. You know what is offensive? Idiotic, homophobic, ignorant morons such as the one above who has conveniently left their name.

"Dr. Timothy Leary," I speak now directly to you. What have we EVER done to you? Have we belittled you? Made fun of you? Tried to pass laws against your existence? No. That, my enemy, is on you. You and your little homophobic, transphobic, probably racist friends.

You know what? I am SICK of hearing about this, I am SICK of debates such as the transgender voting, and I am SICK of bullies.

"I'm not a bully," you may try to plead. Go ahead. Try to change my mind. It's impossible. Bullies have no good reason for their actions, just as transphobic and homophobic people have no good reason for their hatred of LGBTQ+ people.

If you want to show support for the protest against the law, please wear a colour from the trans flag (blue, pink, white) on November 6th. Please stand by those who need you now, as we would stand by you if our roles were reversed.

Anonymous

I recently wrote a paper on this exact subject matter. Summary of The True Cost of Discriminatory Legislation: LGBTQ+ in the Workplace So, what should one do as a member of the LGBTQ+ community, an ally, or a concerned business owner that sees the profit in inclusion do? Whether you are a Republican or Democrat, fiscally conservative and socially conscious or a combination of these, read beyond the politically correct names, such as, the First Amendment Defense Act, The Religious Freedoms Restorations Act and the Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act. Read through the litigation that is coming out in enough detail to understand the true cost and effect of its contents. “A poll released earlier this year shows that 70% of Americans support nondiscrimination laws. Sixty-four percent of Americans say that the requirement for business owners to serve everyone equally, including LGBT people, trumps an individual's religious beliefs.” (Bautista, Targeted News Service, 2017) As we have discussed, the LGBTQ+ community and its allies still need to be aware of and fight back against discriminatory legislation that is being introduced through currently. If legislation such as those referenced above are allowed to become laws that makes it possible for business owners and companies to fire members of the LGBTQ+ community not only the lives of the individuals, but the companies that chose to enforce them will eventually be negatively affected as well. Although it is acknowledged that creating and running a small businesses is a daunting task and that the entrepreneurs are taking the full weight and responsibility of being in business the question remains, should this give them the right to refuse service and employment to people based on their sexuality and gender. The detriment to the individual, the society and GDP in lost wages and unnecessary loss of income cannot fully be put into a dollar amount at this time. The state and federal government can take a stand on LGBTQ+ based on the Constitution without giving license to discriminate in the form of exemptions for religious and moral grounds. With the above said people in the LGBTQ+ community are still people and deserve/require the same right to work and receive goods and services as anyone else. Bautista, J. (2017) Breaking: Supreme court will hear case of business seeking anti-LGBT religious exemption. (2017, Jun 26). Targeted News Service

Stay Informed