Assembly-Line Injustice

Dozens of tired, bedraggled men line up in shackles to plead guilty en masse. A judge claims his personal best is sentencing 70 people in 30 minutes: an average of twenty-five seconds per person to review the charges, hear his or her plea, and hand down a sentence.

No, this is not Egypt or Russia. It's the United States, in federal courthouses along the Southwest border.

What's driven our courts to adopt such assembly-line justice? Operation Streamline, a "zero tolerance" program that began under Bush and expanded under Obama.

Traditionally, federal authorities handled illegal immigration through the comprehensive enforcement scheme available under civil immigration laws. That enforcement scheme—which has deported about 2 million people over the past five years—already results in significant unfairness. But under Operation Streamline, authorities both process apprehended migrants for deportation and refer them for criminal prosecution for crossing the border.

Last week, the Pew Research Center hinted at the impact of Operation Streamline when it reported that felony convictions for unlawfully reentering the United States accounted for 26% of the federal convictions tracked by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2012—a 13-fold increase over two decades ago, when they accounted for just 2% of the total. But as stunning as this number is, it's less than half of the story. There's been an even bigger explosion in misdemeanor convictions for unlawfully entering the country (which are not tracked in the Sentencing Commission database examined by Pew).

Together, misdemeanor and felony border-crossing prosecutions now dominate federal dockets. In 2013, 80% of the federal criminal cases filed in Arizona and New Mexico, 83% of the cases filed in western Texas, and 88% of the cases filed in southern Texas were for illegal border-crossing. Nationwide, one out of every two cases filed by federal prosecutors was for border-crossing. (These stats are compiled by Syracuse University's TRAC project.)

In a better world, criminal justice resources would be allocated to the most serious, high priority crimes. Instead, federal prosecutors are spending scarce time and money on the unnecessary criminalization of immigration.

These prosecutions are also swelling the flow of immigrants into jails and federal prisons. As the Justice Department stated in its FY2015 budget request for federal pretrial detention: "Nowhere has the impact of changing law enforcement priorities on detention expenditures been more observable than with the implementation of zero tolerance immigration enforcement policies along the [Southwest Border]." As the budget request explains, the number of people annually booked into federal custody for immigration offenses has more than doubled since the start of Operation Streamline, hitting nearly 98,000 in 2013. (To give a sense of how big that number is: It's more than three times the number of people that were booked for federal drug offenses the same year.)

Political leaders on both sides of the aisle are starting to wake up to the unnecessary fiscal and human costs of mass incarceration. But immigration remains a blind spot for too many. Rather than repeat the mistakes of the ongoing War on Drugs by unnecessarily criminalizing immigrants, we need to end our national addiction to over-criminalization and over-incarceration in all their permutations.

Learn more about immigration detention and other civil liberty issuesSign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (4)
Read the Terms of Use


The solution I see is not concentrating the enforcement on the immigrants but charging employers with heavy criminal and civil penalties Illegal immigrants come for jobs and benefits, If they were not avalible than they wouldn't come illegally nor would they stay


This is a travesty of justice as well as a tremendous waste of manpower and money.
Instead of incarcerating people coming to the US to work, we need to provide an easier path to a work permit, if not to full citizenship.
Let them take jobs citizens don't want or for which there aren't enough workers, support themselves and their families, pay taxes, etc., instead of supporting a prison industry paid for by our taxes.

As regards the court scene, do these people even have lawyers? How can we claim "liberty and justice for all" (not just all citizens, ALL) when our federal government is engaged in such an abrogation of human rights?


Why does a picture of the inside of a USPS mail processing plant appear on this article?


We don't have an immigration problem. What we do have is a simple Economics 101, supply and demand problem. Mexico has a large demand for better paying jobs, and the US has a large supply of business owners willing to hire Mexican workers.

Stay Informed