When Minority Report Becomes New Yorkers' Reality

Pictured: A slide on facial recognition technology from Gov. Andrew Cuomo's "Reimagining New York's Crossings" presentation.

Tucked into Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s presentation on his $100 billion plan to invest in the state’s infrastructure last week was an initiative that will put New Yorkers’ privacy in peril.

Part of Cuomo’s plan to “reimagine New York’s crossings for the 21st century” calls for installing controversial advanced cameras, license plate readers, and facial recognition technology in New York’s airports and other transportation hubs. The plan also will install sensors and cameras at “structurally sensitive” points on bridges and tunnels.

This is a transformative surveillance system — one that has the potential to put thousands and thousands of people's images and data in a massive database that could be easily misused by the government in ways we haven’t even imagined yet. It’s also not yet clear how the information will be stored and who will have access to it. What is clear is that there is an enormous risk that innocent people will be misidentified as terrorists, especially people of color. That’s because facial recognition technology, while certainly not error proof generally, is much more likely to misidentify minorities. A 2012 study, highlighted by the Atlantic, for example, found that a facial recognition algorithm failed to identify the right person nearly twice as often when the photo was of a Black person.

The other technologies touted by Cuomo are far from harmless as well. Just ask Robert Harte how police use of license plate readers can go awry. A SWAT team in Kansas raided Harte’s house where his wife, 7-year-old daughter, and 13-year-old son lived based in part on the mass monitoring of cars parked at a gardening store. Harte was held at gunpoint for two hours while cops combed through his home. The police were looking for a marijuana growing operation. They did not find that or any other evidence of criminal activity in Harte’s house.

It’s also important to understand that these technologies have a way of creeping towards ubiquity. It starts with a camera here or a license plate reader there, but soon they are everywhere. And just as important, Gov. Cuomo’s plan sets a disturbing precedent that could be followed by other states.

We are taking one step closer to the dystopian world of Minority Report without any discussion of the serious privacy concerns that are implicated.


View comments (12)
Read the Terms of Use


Freedom just another word for someone with nothing left to loose...


And yet again we're back into General Warrant territory - the idea that the government has the right and obligation to invade every bit of privacy they can (and some they legally can't) in the hopes that they'll catch citizens engaged in criminal activity.


I will take this option over the reality of Islamic terrorism. You all stop that First, and then we can get rid of these vile security methods, after.


Stop being a pussy.


This is the truest mark of bigotry - not the use of slurs, not violence, but the willing suspension of rights guaranteed by the Constitution as long as that suspension will harm a despised Other.


Please, tell me you're joking?


Once we have a full blown "surveillance industry" - lobbyists for that industry may be the greatest enemy of privacy and the Fourth Amendment this nation has ever seen in it's history.

Under the Citizens United ruling, corporations are "corporate persons" that have a free speech megaphone that overpowers the voices of "human persons" in Congress and state legislatures.

If this sounds like a lot of legalese and frivolous lawyer talk, we can thank the Republicans and so-called Conservatives in Congress for creating this legal structure. They ain't very conservative on the Fourth Amendment and Bill of Rights which they swore an oath to protect!


These are already in use--read between the lines and say something now before all our privacy and relative normalcy is stripped away in a dysutopian nightmare of distrust. I'm serious.


I've been talking to just about everyone I can regarding this issue (KGB style surveillance) for many years now. What gets me is how indifferent people are. They seem to want the security at any cost.


The American people are sleep walking through 1984, with the selection of Clinton being a prime example. The so-called smart ones will put this enemy of privacy, 1st Amendment and freedon from just plain being bombed in office, rather than dig in and say, they are both unacceptable. I'm glad I am old, and had a free life, but I am sad for those coming up.


Stay Informed