Back to News & Commentary

NSA Legislation Since the Leaks Began

Michelle Richardson,
Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office
Robyn Greene,
ACLU Washington Legislative Office
Share This Page
August 15, 2013

Since the Guardian published the FISA Court order mandating Verizon Business Network Services hand over all its customers’ phone records to the National Security Agency in early June, Congress has responded with bill after bill to rein in the NSA’s surveillance programs, increase transparency, and reform how the secret FISA Court is staffed and operates.

Currently there are 19 bills pending in Congress with more expected to be introduced. The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court.

(For more on NSA surveillance, click here.)

With the recent narrow defeat of the Amash Amendment to defund the bulk phone records’ collection program, and more disclosures coming, Congress is more engaged on the issue of the government’s suspicionless collection and surveillance of Americans’ communications than it ever has been over the last decade. The ACLU will continue to work with Congress to stop the government’s spying on innocent people as well as force disclosure about how these programs are used and the secret court rulings that support them. (This list will be updated as events dictate.)

SUBSTANTIVE BILLS

LEAD (total 8.2.13)
BILL NUMBER & TITLE
SUMMARY OF REFORMS

Conyers-Amash (51)
H.R.2399: LIBERT-E Act
215 Orders:

  • Increases standard to “relevant and material”
  • strikes presumption of relevance
  • requires statement of specific and articulable facts giving reasonable ground to believe
  • requires that tangible things must “pertain only to an individual that is the subject of such investigation”

Gag Orders:

  • Strikes 1 year waiting period to challenge
  • Strikes requirement that AG assertion is conclusive unless made in bad faith

Reporting:

  • Reports must be available to all members of Congress in manner consistent w/nat’l sec.
  • W/in 180 days, AG must make unclassified summaries of all decisions, orders, or opinions publicly available
  • W/in 45 days of enactment, AG makes available to all members of Congress every report, decision, order, opinion,
  • pleading, application, or memoranda of law; and unclassified summary w/in 180 days
  • W/in 1 year, DoJ IG report on Secs. 215 and 702; redacted versions available to public w/in 180 days

Leahy (11)
S.1215: FISA Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2013
215 Orders:

  • Info. sought must pertain to AFP, be relevant to activities of AFP subject to investigation, or pertain to individual in contact with, or known to, AFP
  • Specific minimization procedures to be listed in application; FISC can review compliance

Pen Register and Trap and Trace Devices: Application requires statement of facts and circumstances and min. procedures

FAA Order: must provide description “with particularity” if identity of target unknown

Delayed Notice Search Warrants: notice after 7 days

Judicial Review of Production and Gag Orders:

  • Strikes 1 year waiting period to challenge
  • Strikes requirement that AG assertion is conclusive unless made in bad faith

Reporting:

  • DoJ IG audit of 215 orders 2010-2013
  • Reports must include whether minimization procedures are adequate
  • Assessments of importance of information from intelligence activities and effectiveness of minimization procedures
  • Reports to Congress every 6 months on NSLs, w/number of requests, and breakdowns for those relating to USP and non-USP
  • Annual unclassified report to Judiciary and Intel. Comms. on authorities’ use, effectiveness, and privacy impact

Sunsets:

  • Rolls back sunset of FISA Amendments Act to 6/1/15
  • NSL authorities under ECPA (18 USC 2709), RFPA (12 USC 3414(a)(5)), FCRA (15 USC 1681u(a), (b)), and NSA of 1947 (50 USC 3162) revert back to pre-Patriot Act standard on 6/1/15; and FCRA Section 627 (15 USC 1681v) is repealed

Udall-Wyden (9)
S.1182: A bill to modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require specific evidence for access to business records and other tangible things, and provide appropriate transition procedures, and for other purposes.
215 Orders:

  • Strikes presumption of relevance
  • Requires that orders pertain to AFP, be relevant to activities of AFP subject to investigation, or pertain to individual in contact with, or known to, AFP

Sanders (1)
S.1168: Restore Our Privacy Act
215 Orders:

  • Requires application to include specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe that each of the tangible things is relevant
  • Requires that order must concern an int’l terrorism investigation conducted by FBI; pertain to AFP and activities of AFP who is subject of investigation

Reporting: Semiannual AG reports to Congress (and consistent w/nat’l sec. make available to public) detailing:

  • Number of applications
  • Number of applications granted, modified, denied
  • Description of each application
  • Analysis of effectiveness of each application

Paul (1)
S.1121: Fourth Amendment Restoration Act of 2013
4th Amendment shall be interpreted to require gov’t to obtain a probable cause warrant to search Americans’ phone records

Ross (1)
H.R.2603: Relevancy Act
215 Orders: Requires that records sought in application are “related to a specific person that is the subject of an investigation: and that any investigation must “be conducted of a specific person or specific group of persons”

Holt (1)
H.R.2818: To repeal the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and for other purposes.
Repeals the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments Act

FISC Reform:

  • Increases term to 10 years but no reappointment
  • Appointment of Special Masters to advise court (persons w/technological expertise)

Warrant Requirement: Requires probable cause warrant to obtain info. on USP under FISA

CALEA: Gov’t cannot require companies to build in access

Whistleblower Complaints: Gov’t employee or contractor can file complaint on FISA violation/mismanagement to Comptroller or Intel. Committees; retaliation prohibited

Reports: GAO conducts annual FISA compliance reviews

Lynch (3)
H.R.2684: Telephone Surveillance Accountability Act of 2013
Searches of Telephony Metadata: Requires judge to issue order to FBI Dir. finding “reasonable, articulable suspicion that the basis of the search is material and specifically relevant to an authorized investigation and enters an order authorizing such search” before searches through collected metadata may be conducted

DISCLOSURE – COURT OPINIONS, GOVERNMENT STATISTICS

LEAD (total 8.2.13)
BILL NUMBER & TITLE
SUMMARY OF REFORMS

Schiff-Rokita (29)
H.R.2475: Ending Secret Law Act
215 Order and FAA Opinion Disclosure: Declassify and make publicly available:

  • All opinions submitted to Congress before enactment w/in 180 days
  • All opinions submitted to Congress after enactment w/in 45 days
  • If declassification impossible, then unclassified summary of decisions; or if summary impossible, then AG must issue unclassified report on “status of the internal deliberations and process regarding the declassification” w/estimates of number of decisions that will and won’t be declassified

Merkley-Lee (15)
S.1130: Ending Secret Law Act
215 Order and FAA Opinion Disclosure: Declassify and make publicly available:

  • All opinions submitted to Congress before enactment w/in 180 days
  • All opinions submitted to Congress after enactment w/in 45 days
  • If declassification impossible, then unclassified summary of decisions; or if summary impossible, then AG must issue unclassified report on “status of the internal deliberations and process regarding the declassification” w/estimates of number of decisions that will and won’t be declassified

Jackson-Lee (13)
H.R.2440: FISA Court in the Sunshine Act of 2013
215 Order and FAA Opinion Disclosure: Declassify and make publicly available:

  • All opinions submitted to Congress before enactment w/in 180 days
  • All opinions submitted to Congress after enactment w/in 45 days
  • If declassification impossible, then unclassified summary of decisions; or if summary impossible, then AG must issue unclassified report on “status of the internal deliberations and process regarding the declassification” w/estimates of number of decisions that will and won’t be declassified

DISCLOSURE – CORPORATE SIDE

LEAD (total 8.2.13)
BILL NUMBER & TITLE
SUMMARY OF REFORMS

Larsen-Amash (4)
H.R.2736: Government Surveillance Transparency Act of 2013
FISA order recipient may report every 90 days on:

  • Aggregate number of orders or directives
  • General description of types of assistance, info., or tangible things
  • Aggregate number of each type of assistance, info., or tangible thing
  • Aggregate number of user accounts affected

Lofgren (10)
H.R. 3035: Surveillance Order Reporting Act of 2013
Public Reporting of Orders Under FISA (50 USC 1801 et seq.), NSLs (18 USC 2709), RFPA (12 USC 3414(a)(5)(A)), FCRA (15 USC 1681u(a),(b), and v(a)), and Nat’l Sec. Act (50 USC 436(a)): Allows electronic service providers to, on a quarterly basis, publicly report estimates, rounded to the nearest 100, of:

  • Number of Gov’t demands for info. under surveillance law
  • Number of demands with which provider complied during reporting period, regardless of when demands were made
  • Number of users and/or accounts for which info. was demanded

Franken (11)
S.1452: Surveillance Transparency Act of 2013
Reporting on FAA: Annual reports to AOUSC and Congress must include

  • Total number of individuals subject to electronic surveillance, unless number is less than 500 and reported as “fewer than 500”
  • Total number of citizens and LPRs surveilled, unless “fewer than 500”

Reporting on 215 Orders: Annual unclassified reports to Intel. and Judiciary Committees and available to public w/in 7 days, include:

  • Number of orders granted, modified, or denied for electronic and wire communications, and info. sought under 18 USC 2703(c)(2) (ex. name, address, call logs, etc.)
  • Report on number of 215 applications; number of orders granted, modified, or denied;
  • Good faith estimates of number of USPs:
    • whose tangible thing produced,
    • who were party to electronic or wire communication produced
    • whose communications were reviewed or accessed
    • who were subscribers of service that was issued order
  • Productions pursuant to 18 USC 2703(c)(2)
  • Number of computer-assisted search queries on 215 intel., and number of queries relating to USP electronic or wire communications
  • Certification that no order were used to obtain content
  • If any number is fewer than 500, that number must be reported as “fewer than 500”

Reporting on FAA: Annual unclassified report to Congress available to public w/in 7 days on total number of FAA orders issued, and good faith estimates of number of:

  • individuals whose electronic or wire communications or communications records were collected under FAA
  • USPs whose electronic or wire communications contents or communications records were collected under FAA
  • USPs who were a party to an electronic or wire communication whose contents or records were collected under 702, and number whose communications were reviewed or accessed (separate report for each subset)
  • USPs who were subscribers of electronic communication service whose records were produced pursuant to 18 USC 2703(c)(2)
  • If any number is fewer than 5OO, that number must be reported as “fewer than 500”

Pen Registers and Trap and Trace Device Reporting: Annual unclassified reports to Congress and available to public w/in 7 days on:

  • Number of applications
  • Number or orders granted, modified, or denied, “good faith estimates” of number of individuals whose electronic or wire communications obtained; “good faith estimates” of number of USP and of number whose info. accessed
  • Number of computer assisted search queries
  • If any number is fewer than 5OO, that number must be reported as “fewer than 500”-“Individual” excludes group, entity, association, corporation, or governmental entity

Aggregate Reporting by Companies: Every 6 months, a person receiving order under FISA Sections 105,402, 501, 702-704, may publicly disclose about the preceding 6 months:

  • total number of orders/directives received
  • Percentage complied with
  • Total number of individual persons, users, or accounts whose info. disclosed
  • May disclose number of individual persons, users, or accounts whose electronic or wire communications contents or records, or information described in 18 USC 2703(c)(2) were produced, except for orders made under Secs. 402, 501, or 702
  • If any number is fewer than 5OO, that number must be reported as “fewer than 500”

FISC REFORM

LEAD (total 8.2.13)
BILL NUMBER & TITLE
SUMMARY OF REFORMS

Blumenthal (9)
S.1460: FISA Judge Selection Reform Act of 2013
Reforms Appointment Process and Make-Up of FISC:

  • Increases FISC to 13 judges
  • Requires 1 judge be appointed from each federal district (incl. DC)
  • Appointment by Chief Justice, but nominated by chief judge in district, and if first nominee rejected, then 2 more made and Chief Justice must choose amongst them
  • Limits appointment to one 7 year term (note: typo in bill)
  • Unless sitting en banc, no FISC judge may hear application that has already been denied by another FISC judge

Appointment to FISA Court of Review: Chief Justice appoints judges from district or circuit courts, but must have approval of at least 5 associate justices

Report on Diversity and Representation of FISC: Committee on Intercircuit Assignment of the Judicial Conference of the US will carry out study and issue report w/in 1 year of enactment

Blumenthal (16)
S.1467: FISA Court Reform Act of 2013
Office of the Special Advocate in executive branch:

  • Special Advocate appointed for renewable 5 year term(s) by presiding judge of FISA Court of Review from list of 5+ candidates provided by PCLOB – if vacant, Acting Special Advocate appointed from Office or PCLOB’s list
  • Duties of Special Advocate:
    • Review all FISC applications and orders and documents/materials relevant to decision
    • Participate in FISC proceedings IF appointed by FISC, or if request to participate made of and granted by FISC
    • May move for FISC to reconsider decision or appeal
    • Protects individuals’ rights by supporting legal interpretations that minimize scope of surveillance and extent of data collection and retention
    • May get help of competent outside counsel, and move to permit participation of amicus curiae (incl. in oral argument – rules for participation w/in 180 days of enactment)
    • May petition for disclosure
  • Standard of Review by FISA Court of Review: de novo re: issues of law; clearly erroneous re: determination of facts

Disclosures of Opinions: AG must disclose all FISC decisions w/significant construction or interpretation of law issued after July 10, 2003, and all FISC decisions appealed by Special Advocate, including FISCR decisions. Disclosures can include (un)redacted order, summary of order, or (un)redacted application/brief/other materials, and must include public document sufficient to:

  • Identify each legal question addressed
  • Generally describe context of the issues
  • Describe construction/interpretation of statute, constitutional provision, or other legal authority
  • Indicate whether decision departs from prior decision

Special Advocate Report to Congress: Annual report on implementation of Act, detailing activities of Office, assessment of Act’s effectiveness, and proposals of new legislation on FISC

Schiff (10)
H.R.2761: Presidential Appointment of FISA Court Judges Act
Designation of FISC Judges: Appointment of FISC judges by the “President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate”

Cohen (12)
H.R.2586: FISA Court Accountability Act
Designation of FISC Judges: 11 judges

  • 3 appointed by Chief Justice;
  • 2 by each of the party leaders chambers of Congress

Limitations on FISC

  • No judge may hear application already denied by another FISC judge
  • En banc authorities only exercised when agreed to by 60%+ of judges sitting en banc
  • Decisions in favor of Gov’t must be unanimous

Disclosures to Congress: Requires AG to submit all FISC opinions to Congress; and an unclassified summary of each decision, order, or opinion

Lynch (2)
H.R.2849: Privacy Advocate General Act of 2013
Creates Office of the Privacy Advocate General (PAG):

  • Independent office in Exec. Branch
  • PAG appointed jointly by Chief Justice and senior Assoc. Justice appointed by President of diff. party from that of Pres. who appointed Chief Justice
  • 7 year term
  • Duties:
    • Serves as opposing counsel to Fed. Gov’t for all applications before FISC, incl. for appeals and cert. petitions to USC
    • May request public disclosure of order, opinion, decision

Surveillance Authority Pending Gov’t Appeal of Denial of FISC Application: FISC Judge may authorize emergency electronic or physical surveillance, or installation of a pen register or trap and trace device, pending gov’t appeal of denial of application if there is:

  • Reasonable argument that surveillance is permissible; and
  • Exceptional circumstances and compelling evidence of necessity of surveillance
  • If appeal denied, information gathered must be destroyed, and cannot be used in any judicial, agency, regulatory, or legislative proceeding, or used or disclosed by federal employees w/out individual’s consent

Learn more about government surveillance and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Learn More About the Issues on This Page