Congress Finally Begins the Process of Reforming Warrantless Government Surveillance

The Trump administration wants to extend the government’s authority to spy on Americans without a warrant. Some Democrats and Republicans, recognizing the need to curb that power, are joining forces to reform the law that has been used to allow that kind of surveillance.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich, and other members of Congress introduced a bill last week to reform Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is set to expire at the end of the year.

The ACLU has long opposed Section 702 for allowing warrantless surveillance of Americans. The provision has been used to unconstitutionally collect hundreds of millions of communications every year, search all international traffic as it moves through the internet backbone, gather wholly domestic communications without a warrant, and search the trove of personal data for information unrelated to national security.

The Trump administration believes this law should be made permanent. We disagree and have urged Congress to either significantly reform the law or let it expire. The bill introduced last week is the first one this year proposing to reform Section 702.  While it has positive elements, it still needs significant improvements.

Here’s our take on some of the good, the less good, and the ugly parts of the bill.

The good

The bill’s biggest step forward is that it prohibits collection of information “about” targets of investigation until 2023. The clear language of Section 702 only permits the government to collect information “to” or “from” foreign targets. The Snowden disclosure revealed, however, that the government was wrongly interpreting the law to allow it to collect international or domestic communications “about” these targets. The NSA temporarily halted about collection in April, but explicitly said that it can restart it in the future. This is particularly concerning given that that the FISA court has found that the government has persistently violated even its own procedures governing searching of these communications, resulting in significant Fourth Amendment violations.

The bill prevents this practice from restarting until 2023. This provision should be improved, however, by permanently halting this type of collected.

The less good

Much of the Section 702 debate has centered around the “backdoor search loophole.” Under Section 702, the government is prohibited from targeting citizens and US residents for surveillance. The government skirts this prohibition, however, by routinely searching the Section 702 database looking specifically for information about Americans.

An improvement over the status quo is that the bill seeks to require approval from the intelligence court for the government to view the contents of communication collected under Section 702 in some cases.  However,  there are concerns that the wording does not make clear that a judge – not the government – must make the appropriate probable cause funding which is needed to make this a true warrant requirement. Moreover, the exceptions to this requirement are sizable.

Among the exceptions to the requirement are circumstances in which the primary purpose is “foreign intelligence.” This means that if the NSA, CIA, NCTC, or FBI want to search for information about someone in the U.S. for the primary purpose of gathering information about topics that are broadly related to foreign affairs or national defense — like climate change, Israeli politics, drought conditions overseas, or any other — they have free rein to do so. And if through these searches they stumble across evidence of a crime, they can flag this information for criminal investigators.

Moreover, the bill does not make clear that the government is required to meet the probable cause requirement in all criminal circumstances, whether or not they are performing a search specifically looking for evidence of a crime. Thus, even in the criminal context, there is room for the government to unconstitutionally view content without a warrant.

Finally, there is no court order required to access non-content information or perform the search in the first place, and there are inadequate protections to ensure that the government does not avoid getting a warrant by falsely claiming an emergency or consent.

The ugly

The most troubling part of the bill is a provision that increases the maximum penalty for the disclosure of classified information, including by whistleblowers. It also creates an entirely new crime that could be used to punish people who accidentally mishandle classified information, including in cases where they did not know the information they had was classified or they take corrective action.

Finally, the bill fails to address a number of problems with existing law. For example, it continues to permit the government to spy on individuals without a warrant who are not suspected of any wrongdoing, including based simply on the fact that they might have information related to foreign affairs or national defense. It does not ensure that individuals receive  notice when Section 702 information is used against them, despite ample evidence that the government has failed to provide adequate notice to criminal defendants. And it does not force the NSA to fulfill its promise made earlier this year to provide an estimate of the number of people in the U.S. whose information is collected under this authority.

The bill is a start, but it does not go far enough to protect individual from warrantless surveillance. Congress must take steps to address the bill’s deficiencies as it moves forward.

Add a comment (9)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

But they can still do all that to the mean Nazis, right? Just kidding (but I suspect some will advocate to let the government do so and some will advocate to let the government do it to Muslim citizens or other groups) These are, however, the ACLU causes I can actually get behind - clear Constitutional violations! These are also the causes that both sides can sometimes approve of when they decide it might be a good idea to let the government do it to the political boogeyman group of the week. That's why the Patriot Act was reauthorized by Obama and still largely in place as the USA Freedom Act, today. I think this bill actually is in response to some of that act (which was signed by Obama as well).

Anonymous

It’s all blah, blah, blah! Does anyone think anything concerning the way departments are conducting themselves will change? All of this shit has been tried before after Nixon was busted using police to violate the rights of private citizens. A bunch of laws were passed to “protect” rights but they did/do little to stop local sheriffs and small good ole boy departments from enforcing their will.

Wait till the “weed wars” break out in California, Nevada, and Colorado between Federal lawmen who think they are the “boss” of all law in the area. Piggie thugs live by the gun and should die by the gun!

Anonymous

Since nearly all Americans have legal standing and have been harmed in some way - Congress and state legislatures could make invasions of privacy a felony with strict enforcement mechanisms.

Ironically, many privacy invasions and violations of the Fourth Amendment are likely perpetrated by local officials in local government exploiting the "War on a Tactic" after 9/11. It's already a federal crime to violate the Fourth Amendment under existing federal statutes, we just need the priority and enforcement. For over 15 years the U.S. Department of Justice has had little interest in prosecuting other government officials violating the Fourth Amendment and actually participated with state Fusion Centers that blacklist innocent Americans - maybe we need an entirely new and independent agency to prosecute privacy invasions. Again the laws are already on the books, we just need enforcement (Ex: Title 18 US Code 241-245 and "Pattern & Practice" statutes).

Until members of Congress and the courts are on the receiving end themselves - like the rest of us - likely nothing will happen.

Dr. Joseph Goebbels

The government spies on its citizens ? ! That's a big surprise!
Honey disconnect the phone.

Anonymous

Kota Bunga cianjur, Sebuah tur yang memperlihatkan kebun bunga yang sangat luas dengan pelbagai variasi bunga di dalamnya. Tetapi bukan hanya itu yang menjadi daya tarik bunga kota cianjur. Kota bunga direka sama dengan suasana kota Venesia di Eropah.
Kebanyakan pelawat mengatakan bahawa daya tarikan kota bunga selain daripada varian bunga agak sedikit venice atau kota venetian kecil. Venice sedikit direka sedemikian rupa sehingga sangat mirip dengan kota Venice di Eropah.

Sebenarnya pengelola kota bunga the little venice tidak hanya memaparkan suasana kota venesia di Eropah. di sini terdapat beberapa tempat foto seperti suasana kuil Itsukushima di jepang dan patung merlion di singapore, ya walaupun patung singa kelihatan lebih banyak pesi pesawat: D.
Di samping itu bunga ktoa dari venice kecil terletak berhampiran dengan beberapa lawatan lain. seperti kebun botani cibodas, taman dan tanaman teh Gunung Mas Puncak, bunga Taman Nusantara, cipanas istana presiden dan ladang strawberi yang dimiliki oleh petani tempatan.

Lokasi Dan Laluan Ke Kota bunga Cianjur
Floral city flower cianjur terletak di Jl. Hanjawar - Kampung Sukanagalih, Kecamatan Pacet, Kabupaten Cianjur, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Lokasi bunga kota cianjur terletak di bukit.
Laluan Menuju kotabunga.web.id tidak terlalu sukar. Perjalanan dari Jakarta ke kota bunga cianjur mengambil masa kira-kira   3 jam atau sekitar 94 KiloMeter. Laluan ini  me lewati Jl. Tol Jagorawi dan Jl. Raya Ciawi - Cianjur / Jl. Raya Puncak. Pelancong yang lewat akan melalui kawasan tersebut sebelum memasuki pacet cipanas.

Kemudahan Dan Permainan Di Kota bunga Cianjur
Kemudahan di ktoa flower cianjur ada sanga lengkap, mulai dari penginapan villa, toilet bersih dan restoran atau kafe mini yang bertaburan di kota bunga puncak cianjur. Di samping itu, keselamatan juga bersedia untuk disimpan di beberapa kawasan. Dengan membayar tiket masuk kota cianjur sebesar Rp 35.000 / orang maka Anda dapat menikmati suasana kota-kota di dunia villa di puncak
Salah satu permainan yang paling disukai di kota bunga cianjur adalah untuk mengembara sekitar kawasan kota bunga menggunakan gondola a la venesia kota di Eropah. Tetapi selain itu terdapat banyak lagi kemudahan lain seperti basikal air besar, bola gelembung dan kapal missisipi.
Selain membentangkan suasana kota Venice di Eropah, Flower City Cipanas terdapat juga kawasan dunia fantasi. Zon permainan Fantasy World direka bentuk untuk menjadi serupa dengan era koboi di Amerika Syarikat.

Yuran masuk di World Fantasy Arena berharga Rp 25.000 per pengunjung dan setiap zon bermain biaya Rp 3.000 - Rp 15.000. Sekiranya anda tidak mahu rumit ada tiket untuk semua permainan dengan harga Rp 40.000.
Beberapa permainan di fantasi Dunia Aaaa cukup banyak, contohnya kereta bumper, rio grande, pejuang jet, kereta antik, orbit utama, lunar di sekitar, sungai usaha, mandi gelembung. Juga di kawasan Fantasy Cianjur taman bunga ada kafe dan restoran, jadi jika pengunjung habis hanya untuk makan dan minum di sana.
Percutian yang menarik ke kota bunga cianjur. Dalam satu masa, anda dapat merasakan suasana beberapa kotaaya di dunia selain banyak permainan dan kemudahan yang menyokong keselesaan pengunjung. Mari masukkan segera ke senarai piknik anda dengan keluarga.

 

omejames

Hi!friends play here free online yahtzee a good news for game lovers is that no need to download and register it click here and enjoy it http://theyahtzee.com this one is type of dice game.Really an amazing point of fun.Many many thanks for this one.

XBox Gift Cards

sash

This post is very helpful. http://sash-windows.biz

Stay Informed