Former CIA director: In order to spy on domestic dissidents, just call them terrorists

This was originally posted on Privacy SOS.

Back in 2012, the ACLU of Massachusetts published a report called 'Policing Dissent', exposing the Boston Police Department's 'red squad' surveillance operations, directed at antiwar and economic justice organizers. Among thedocuments we obtained through a public records lawsuit were so-called 'intelligence reports' from the Boston police fusion center, the Boston Regional Intelligence Center (BRIC). These documents shocked the public. In files labeled "HOMESEC-DOMESTIC", "GROUPS-CIVIL DISTURBANCE", and "GROUPS-EXTREMISTS",  detectives described the entirely peaceful activities of groups and individuals ranging from Veterans for Peace and CodePink to Howard Zinn and a former city council member.

While the BPD files didn't explicitly call these non-violent activists 'terrorists', detectives working at a so-called 'counterterrorism fusion center' came about as close as they could get to doing so without spelling out the T word in black and white. But it's no secret that other law enforcement agencies jumped that shark long ago. In recent years, undercover informants have infiltrated antiwar movements targeted as "domestic terrorists". While the past decade's terror wars have given local, state, and federal law enforcement seemingly endless funds to pursue activists simply for challenging government policy, the US government's conflation of peaceful dissent with terrorism has a long history in the United States, dating back at least to the 1970s.

Betty Medsger's new book on the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI, "The Burglary", contains some relevant and largely suppressed history. In the wake of the Media, PA burglary and the subsequent newspaper articles exposing J. Edgar Hoover's red squad surveillance programs, some CIA officers began to voice dissent internally about their own agency's troubling domestic operations, codenamed MHCHAOS. In 1972, Medsger writes, CIA director Richard Helms

called his top aides together and said he was adamant that MHCHAOS would not be "stopped simply because some members of the organization [the CIA] do not like this activity." He made changes in order to protect the program more now that the [dissident officers were] so determined to have it end. To the maximum extent possible, within the agency, the program and the agent then in charge of it, Richard Ober, would be identified with terrorism and not with American dissidents. The massive program would in fact have the same functions it always had, including the monitoring and destruction of the more than five hundred alternative newspapers staffs it had under surveillance. (At the same time, the FBI also monitored alternative and campus newspapers, sometimes suppressing them.)

Henceforth, Colby wrote in a memorandum after that meeting, the label "international terrorist" would replace "political dissident" as the target of the CIA's illegal domestic operations. As part of this image transformation, Helms did what Hoover had done many times—and would do again in April 1971 to protect COINTELPRO when he thought it was about to be revealed—to minimize the possibility that secret operations would be exposed. Helms ended MHCHAOS in name, but continued it in reality with a new name: International Terrorism Group. It would be much easier for people, including people within the CIA, to accept the domestic operations if they thought they were aimed primarily at stopping terrorism rather than at stopping dissent.

It's common to hear law enforcement officials describe non-violent activists as terrorists today. History suggests we can thank former CIA director Richard Helms for that, at least in part. Years after his agency's assassinations, anti-dissent programs, antidemocratic coups, and other dirty tricks were exposed to the public in congressional hearings during the 1970s, Helms reportedly said that all of it was "just a congressional firestorm over nothing," Medsger writes.

The CIA's domestic operations offices are currently based in Denver, Colorado. Per an executive order signed by Ronald Reagan in 1981, the CIA is allowed to collect information about Americans. The details of the order are classified, so we can't be sure, but it's a safe bet to assume that if the agency wants to spy on American dissidents, it just calls them Terrorists.

This was originally posted on Privacy SOS.

Learn more about government surveillance and other civil liberty issuesSign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (3)
Read the Terms of Use


Good grief! With all the stuff this guy has been accused of doing I don't see what the hell someone named a gd BUILDING after him for: J. Edgar Hoover building.
WHAT is it? You torture, maim and terrorize people in new and unusual ways, you get a ticket to the world or something?
President Obama found Osama bin Laden and HE hasn't had ANYthing named after him.
But George Bush and J. Edgar Hoover BOTH have something named for them.

Excuse me if that fact doesn't jump right out and impress me.
It does OTOH jump up and disgust the living hell out of me. It makes me wish all those silly zombie movies everyone's always watching were true. I know of some people I'd be willing to sacrifice to them.


And the war on terror ever increases as we try not to offend people.

To the comment above: Obama has been so worshipped he will have plenty named after him so don't worry. However, he did NOT find Bin Laden. Just like Bush isn't blamed for NOT finding Bin Laden they are simply the men in charge when these events occur. The real hero remains unnamed most likely because of their humility and willingness to call some folks a terrorist for the sake of YOURs and my freedom.


Hello,If you were to know just how much the Government does know,you would be startled that's for sure.It,the monitoring of all communications worldwide,in all its forms has to do with Alein Activity.I'm well a were that this sounds spaced out,no pun intended.But the fact that this is a reality,and nothing to laugh about.They,Aleins,are a real threat.There is alot of information outthere on the net about them.Scientific Proof Aleins Created Human Life,is one of the sites I submitted all the known information about them.That is a actuality.My name is Robert Brule.

Stay Informed