New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here at Home

The current debate about government surveillance has largely overlooked the CIA, possibly because we know little about the agency's activities within the United States. While the relevant legal authorities governing the CIA, including Executive Order 12333, set out the CIA's mandate, they do so in broad terms. Beyond the generalities in EO 12333 and other laws, the public has had few opportunities to examine the rules governing the CIA's activities. 

The Most Important Surveillance Order We Know Almost Nothing About.

But we know more today than we did a few weeks ago. In response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the ACLU and Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, the CIA has released a slew of documents concerning CIA surveillance under EO 12333. (The Justice Department has also recently released a set of documents related to the executive order.)

The national debate in the 1970s about the proper limits of U.S. government spying on its own citizens was, to a large extent, about the CIA. In the wake of the Watergate scandal and news stories about other illegal CIA activity, President Gerald Ford and Congress launched investigations into the full range of CIA misdeeds — from domestic spying programs and infiltration of leftist organizations to experimentation on non-consenting human subjects and attempts to assassinate foreign leaders.

Although the CIA's legal authority to spy on Americans was very narrow, these investigative committees — chaired by Sen. Frank Church, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, and Rep. Otis Pike — discovered that the CIA had engaged in a massive domestic spying project, "Operation CHAOS," which targeted anti-war activists and political dissenters. The committee reports also revealed that, for more than 20 years, the CIA had indiscriminately intercepted and opened hundreds of thousands of Americans' letters. In addition to documenting the intelligence agencies' extensive violations of the law, the Church Committee concluded that the constitutional system of checks and balances "has not adequately controlled intelligence activities."

The Church Committee's conclusion — at core, an admonition — still resonates today. While the documents that the CIA has released are heavily redacted, raising more questions than they answer, they strongly suggest that the agency's domestic activities are extensive.

Some highlights from the documents:

  • A key CIA regulation titled "AR 2-2" governs the conduct of the CIA's activities, which include domestic intelligence collection.

AR 2-2, which has never been publicly released before, includes rules governing a wide range of activities, including surveillance of U.S. persons, human experimentation, contracts with academic institutions, relations with journalists and staff of U.S. news media, and relations with clergy and missionaries. 

Several annexes to AR 2-2 contain the agency's EO 12333 implementing procedures. For example, Annex A, "Guidance for CIA Activities Outside the United States," sets forth the procedures that apply to CIA activity directed toward U.S. citizens and permanent residents who are abroad. Much of the relevant information is redacted. Annex F, "Procedures Governing Conduct and Coordination by CIA and DEA of Narcotics Activities Abroad," is similarly redacted in key sections, including the section discussing the agencies' "Specific Agreement Concerning Electronic Surveillance."

  • The documents indicate that the CIA engages in a wide array of domestic activity, often in conjunction with the FBI.

Domestically, the CIA's spying is governed by Annex B to AR 2-2, "Guidance for CIA Activities Within the United States." This document explains:

Highlight portion: II. (U) RESPONSIBILITIES. CIA is responsible within the United States for (A) U. Collecting, producing, and disseminating foreign intelligence and counterintelligence, including counterintelligence and significant foreign intelligence n

Although EO 12333, AR 2-2, and Annex B prohibit the agency from engaging in electronic surveillance within the United States, the CIA can nevertheless ask the FBI to do its bidding:

HIGHLIGHTED PORTION: Request that the FBI or any other authorized intelligence agency undertake electronic surveillance in the United States

Annex B and the CIA-FBI memorandum of understanding comport with past reporting that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorized the FBI to work with the CIA to collect Americans' financial records in bulk under Patriot Act Section 215. 

In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may "use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs."

But what qualifies as a "monitoring device"? And how exactly does monitoring differ from "electronic surveillance," which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don't know. In the newly released documents, the definition of "monitoring" (as distinct from "electronic surveillance") is redacted.​

The CIA also turned over several years' worth of annual reports to Congress about the agency's activities under EO 12333. These reports begin by discussing "Intelligence Activities Conducted by CIA Within the United States." This header is followed by dozens of entirely redacted pages — once again suggesting that the agency is engaged in a significant amount of intelligence activity here at home. ​

  • The rules for the handling of Americans' information are so complex that the CIA struggled to apply them properly.

A 2002 report by the CIA inspector general, "Intelligence Activity Assessment: Compliance with Executive Order 12333: The Use of [redacted] Collection [redacted] from 1995–2000," observed "a general and widespread lack of understanding" within the CIA of the rules governing the retention and sharing of U.S. citizens' and permanent residents' information. In particular, the OIG found that few managers or other officers "could accurately state the appropriate procedures for retaining or disseminating U.S. person information," and it concluded that these rules were "not being applied consistently" by the agency.

* * *

The independent and bi-partisan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is currently examining the intelligence community's counterterrorism-related activities under EO 12333. Notably, one of the topics the board plans to focus on is the CIA's collection of information within the United States. We hope that, when the board eventually issues its public report about the agencies' activities under EO 12333, it sheds a little more light on what exactly the CIA is doing here at home.

View comments (33)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

Former Israeli mossad officers in their intel community are coming to the US and selling commercial spyware/software on the retail market. Naftali Bennett made millions and the Israel IDF officer who owns Mintigo is another. If we can stop Israeli businesses from selling on the DOW and Nasdaq we can stop Israel's apartheid and massacres in the Palestine regions of Gaza, the West Bank, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

Plaintiff

Elkins v FAA, 1:14-CV-001791, US District Court, District of Columbia FOIA action /after the judge ordered the FAA to release radar plot data of DOJ aircraft conducting Unwarranted surveillance, in which exemption 7 (E) didn't work and 7(A) was dropped, because the FAA and DOJ could show a legal "On going investigation was occurring" the FAA now say's, "Ooops, we made a mistake, now it's Exemption 1 "Classified Information" classic DOJ "Exemption Shopping"

Jake Rake

There is ongoing non consensual human experimentation using "spiritual warfare," "perception warfare," and "no touch torture" weapons. Essentially this is a bi-directional human machine interface that uses EEG heterodyning technology to interface with the central nervous system. These technologies are used in conjunction with domestic psychological warfare campaigns to silence dissenters, reporters, and to engage in revenge activities. Mind reading and remote torture are not science fiction. This is happening. The victims are calling themselves "Targeted Individuals" and the physical effects they are experiencing come from these types of weapons. There are several whistle blowers that have come forward to discuss these crimes. You can read "Project Soulcatcher" by Dr Robert Duncan (CIA whistle blower), "Guinea Pigs" by Dr John Hall, and the paper "Misled and Betrayed: how cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon and illegal human testing secret" by Cheryl Welsh to gain a sense of the scope of this crime.

james lico

I got excited seeing your post because i at first thought it was part of the article. I agree with everything you said. I was targeted with torture in August of 2010, but think I was targeted before that, back to 1995. possibly before that also. I used to get strange headaches back in the 1970's. They started abruptly and I thought they were sinus headaches. Yet there didnt seem to be any fluid in my sinuses. Thinking back on it, it felt like the result of radiation. Any way, its nice to meet another TI. my website is http://jameslico.com

Anonymous

Yes, it is happening to me with this "monitoring device" that they use to "monitor" people. Thank you for this article it was very informative.

Anonymous

Yes….it's real and it's torture

Anonymous

Yup.

Anonymous

I am a targeted victim of this illegal brain torture abuse. It is real and it is time to hold these criminal nap intelligence agencies accountable to their torture crimes. I am suffering tremendously. I am good my blind from it and I trip all over my words when I speak from my brain Intell facing with their mkultra extension electronic fascism. The United states is a criminal organization. 9/11 was a wet black op. This country has gone decades in reverse to STASI East German conduct. Start a revolution now.

Ricardo Ali Fer...

For over sixty years we have witnessed the abusive application of the state secrets privilege and related doctrine, act, executive order, regulation and related policy abuses. The recent passage of the USA FREEDOM ACT is a tiny step in the right direction in stopping these taxpayer funded intelligence gathering serial criminal abuses.

Anonymous

Ricardo--I'm afraid it's not as good as it seems. By turning data collections over to private companies/corps. there are now NO gov't. regs. or restrictions--all's fair game. This privatization is actually horrendous--they can collect anything, anytime, anywhere, from anyone, etc. Ugh....

Pages

Stay Informed