We’re Demanding Records on Comey’s Dismissal. Here’s Why.

The ACLU today submitted a request to the Department of Justice and the FBI asking for the release of all documents relating to President Donald Trump’s decision to remove FBI Director James Comey from office. The cloud of uncertainty swirling over Comey’s dismissal, along with indications that the president may have gravely abused his power, demands a public accounting.


At the time of his dismissal, FBI Director Comey was responsible for overseeing an ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election and possible collusion between Trump campaign officials and the Russian government. According to initial White House statements — by most accounts hastily assembled with little coordination — the president dismissed Comey on the recommendation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The two, we learned, had prepared a pair of memoranda asserting that Comey had mishandled the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server and had violated Department of Justice policies when he publicly announced the results of that investigation. (This, despite the fact that both Sessions and Trump had previously lauded Comey’s handling of that investigation.)

Subsequent reports indicate that the president had already decided to fire Comey — among other reasons, for being insufficiently loyal to the president — and that he sought the help of Sessions and Rosenstein to justify his decision. Several days after the dismissal, the president said in an interview that he fired Comey because “he’s a showboat, he’s a grandstander.” President Trump also stated that he had the Russia investigation in mind when he fired Mr. Comey, and media accounts indicate that Mr. Comey had requested additional resources for the FBI’s investigation in the days before he was dismissed. In other words, the White House’s explanations for firing Comey shifted significantly over a matter of days, and the public doesn’t know the actual basis for the decision.

As the nation’s predominant law enforcement agency, the FBI’s impact on American justice can’t be overstated. Our history offers important lessons into why the FBI director role needs to be insulated from political interference. In response to both Watergate and a litany of abuses wrought by J. Edgar Hoover’s five-decade tenure as FBI director, Congress established a 10-year term meant to both check the director’s power and insulate the position from party politics. The FBI plays a central role in defending the rule of law, conducting domestic law enforcement investigations, and protecting against civil rights and civil liberties violations. As a result, the agency has tremendous power to affect the lives of ordinary people — for good or ill. Its use of those powers should not be affected by political interests.

The president’s actions and shifting justifications threaten the rule of law. As both Trump and his deputy press secretary suggested, by firing Mr. Comey, Trump sought to hasten an end to the FBI’s ongoing investigation into his own campaign. But the rule of law requires that investigators and prosecutors have the independence to follow the facts wherever they lead — even if they lead to the president’s door. It is a firmly rooted tradition in our democracy that the president does not interfere with individual criminal investigations — let alone those that implicate the president’s own interests or the interests of his family, friends, or political associates.

To intervene in such an investigation, or to obstruct its progress, threatens to place the president above the law. It would subvert our system of justice, which requires the FBI and Department of Justice to hold even the most powerful to account. For these reasons, the ACLU has called for the appointment of a special prosecutor and the establishment of a select committee to investigate the Trump campaign’s ties to Russian interference. We have also called for the acting FBI director to permanently lead the Russia investigation. At this stage, this is the best way to ensure the investigation’s independence.

Meanwhile, we cannot afford to be kept in the dark on the president’s actual reasons for firing the FBI director.

View comments (58)
Read the Terms of Use

Muriel Geller

I completely support your efforts to find justice,


I have said from day one of this man's campaign that he would do exactly what he is doing now. Destroying the constitution and democracy as we know it. His inability to understand governmentals process with a continual lying attitude, he must be impeached. The case for impeachment is self evident. Wake-up Republicans, defend country over party lines and remove this President.


I wish you all the success possible. We little people need a champion. The Republicans will insulate the president from all attacks. If Trump is innocent, then he has nothing to hide and should have no fear of an investigation. But it sure appears that he's behaving like a scared rabbit.


Patrick Toomey definitely beats off to photos of Donald Trump. What a strange fetish this sicko has.


You. Are. HATERS
TRUST. TRUMP #!!#!!!❤

Retired teacher

So many unethical decisions, but money laudering with Russia is huge.


Comey should have prosecuted Hillary,just goes to show how some people can get away with anything and other people people can't even fart with out the media trying to smell it

Marianne Roncoli

All my conservative friends keep saying that so far there has been no indication any wrong-doing by the Oval Office, so don't judge the president before all the facts are assembled and reviewed.

I can see their point. Aren't the press and Democrats implying wrong doing without assessment of the evidence?

I believe that is the nature of this kind of investigation that the law takes time to work out everything...this is how the constitution was written: don't jump to conclusions without evidence...take time reviewing things...carefully follow the law. Most people don't appreciate the complexity of the law and the time it takes getting to the facts and drawing conclusions. When politics are involved, the gap between the time it takes to assemble the evidence and come to a decision leaves room for political sides to draw their own conclusions for their own partisan purposes. Can you explain better to everyone why it takes so long as well as the complexities that are involved? If I was to forward this article to my conservative friends, it would not change any of their minds. It reads like an opinion piece in the New York Times.


Stay Informed