North Carolinians To Vote On Anti-LGBT Amendment One Tuesday

North Carolinians will go to the polls tomorrow to vote on Amendment One, a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban civil unions and domestic partnerships by making marriage between a man and a woman the only “domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized” in the state.

Placed on the ballot by the Republican-controlled state legislature in September without much notice or any public testimony, Amendment One is one of the most extreme anti-LGBT measures ever proposed on a statewide ballot. While supporters claim the amendment would simply codify North Carolina’s existing ban on same-sex marriage, the truth is the amendment goes beyond that by risking harm to all unmarried couples -- gay and straight -- across the state. According to a report by University of North Carolina law professors, Amendment One could take away legal protections from more than 200,000 families by eliminating domestic partner insurance benefits offered by several state municipalities, jeopardizing health care and child custody for unmarried couples and their children, and -- depending on how state courts interpret the untested phrase “domestic legal union” -- even invalidate domestic violence protections for unmarried women or prevent the state from giving committed couples the ability to make medical and financial decisions for one another.

While many North Carolinians still remain confused about the amendment’s potential harms, support for the measure has gradually declined as polls consistently show that voters are less likely to support Amendment One when they understand its full impact. A majority of North Carolinians support civil unions for same-sex couples, which Amendment One would ban. 

Perhaps the most encouraging development in the anti-amendment campaign has been the broad and bipartisan chorus of voices that have publicly opposed the discriminatory and mean-spirited measure. In addition to high-profile Democrats including President Obama, former President Bill Clinton, Governor Bev Perdue, and Attorney General Roy Cooper, many prominent local conservatives, such as U.S. Rep. Renee Elmers (R-Dunn) , former Republican mayor of Charlotte Richard Vinroot, and former state Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr have also come out against Amendment One because, in the words of John Hood, president of the conservative John Locke Foundation, amending North Carolina’s constitution to take away rights rather than preserve them is “unwise and unfair.”

Even legislative sponsors of the amendment have voiced concerns. Speaker of the House Thom Tillis (R), who helped shepherd Amendment One’s passage through the legislature, said he has philosophical reservations about the measure because “we’re the party of limited government,” and predicted that if Amendment One does pass, it will be repealed within 20 years because of the rising “generational” support for LGBT rights in North Carolina and nationally. In reaction to public outcry from constituents, another amendment sponsor, Representative Jim Crawford (D) changed his position entirely, saying, “I will definitely vote against it because I think it goes too far.”

The state’s Libertarian Party, business executives from Duke Energy and Bank of America, more than four hundred faith leaders, advocates for children and domestic violence victims, the state chapter of the NAACP, and family law professors from every university in the state have also forcefully spoken out against the amendment.   

As a founding member of the anti-amendment Coalition to Protect All NC Families, the ACLU of North Carolina has been at the forefront of the campaign, hiring a full-time organizer, producing campaign literature, publishing op-eds, speaking out in panels and community meetings across the state, and even partnering with local LGBT rights organization Equality NC to develop the Know + Love Project, a website to share stories of loving and committed North Carolina families with gay and lesbian members, such as the above video featuring Lennie and Pearl of High Point, North Carolina, who have been together for 45 years.

Win or lose tomorrow, advocates for LGBT equality in the Tar Heel state are already confident that the large and still-growing coalition of groups and individuals who came together against Amendment One have created an unprecedented infrastructure with which we can wage future battles to defend and expand civil liberties not just for LGBT North Carolinians, but all people in our state.  

Add a comment (7)
Read the Terms of Use

Philip Maise

Ending the same-sex marriage and adoption issue requires to get to the root of the big money coming from super PACs like National Organization for Marriage. That is why I filed a class action lawsuit against all super PAC donors. To understand legal basis see:

Philip B. Maise

Philip Maise

Getting donors into Court who spend money against same-sex rights is key.

Zoe Williams

Mr. Maise, what can folks who don't have the money to file lawsuits and hire lawyers do to help the issue?

Michael Lawson

I tried informing as many people as I could about this amendment. I even did my final paper in my English class on why the bill is terrible for this state.

Unforunately, it passed. The proposition should've never taken place. Once again, people let their religious values, personal prejudices, and lack of understanding decide how they vote.

I am ashamed of the passing. I hope the ACLU gets involved in this matter. Too much is at risk now for thousands of North Carolinians.

Don Haley

Not giving all American citizens equal rights is un-constitutional and un-American and un-christian. Those "christians" who are against this are only practicing "selective" christianity and should be ashamed of their bigotry. Do they think their "god" rejects people who are born homosexual? Do they think "he" doesn't love them the way they think "he" loves them? I would think that their "god" would love them, the bigots, a bit less than the people they are trying to suppress!
The christian bigots are really mental "peeping toms" because I think that they are thinking about and fretting over what homosexuals do sexually. What anyone does sexually, other than rape, child molestation, incest, public displays of sex, etc., is no one else's business. Bigots should realize that they are mentally peeping through homosexual's windows trying to see what they are doing. That's way more perverted than what they might see if they could peep through bedroom windows! "Christians" are way too caught up in their cult than they realize. Relax and let other Americans have and enjoy the same rights and freedom as you have been given!
Besides. this issue arises from religion, which the Constitution clearly states that there must be a separation of church and State

Philip Maise

Aloha Zoe,

I cannot offer you legal advise, however, I can tell you a few facts.

Unlike school it is plenty fine for you to copy others work.
The State of Maine is the one that recently fought and won against the National Organization for Marriage. NOM
All of those documents are on-line.

According to North Carolina law a "business" can give unlimited amounts to stop same-sex marriages. However, the law did not say an individual can.

Money that flows into NOM mainly comes from individuals.

In Maine it was shown that NOM passed money through a money loop to help disguise who the individual donors were.

In Maine it was shown that doing this was illegal since it broke Maine's state laws.

I already checked your state election laws are on line.

Usually, a state prosecutor is the best person to prosecute a case. I have to prosecute on my own since the FEC fails to prosecute.

So obviously at one point someone took the ball and said to Maine's government HEY they broke the law.

Philip B. Maise


Gay people should have there rights just the same as straight or bi or gay people !!!!!!!
what happen to freedom ?????? that should be any ones own dam choice if they want to get married or not. no matter what sex gender!
not all wants a man to a woman, or a woman to a man! if 2 woman want's each other, or 2 man wants each other, let them be !!!! people has died fighting for freedom. but else i still see no freedom in these's case's
and it is just not being fair to the same sex choice ! ! !

Sign Up for Breaking News