Teens Who Engage in ‘Sexting’ Should Not Be Prosecuted as Sex Offenders

In an early episode of the television series “Girls,” Adam sends Hannah a photo of his penis and then a text message: “SRY that wasn’t for you.”

Hannah and her friends debate the intention of Adam’s actions, but one thing is clear: The explicit photo he sent isn’t unusual, and it certainly isn’t criminal.

Had he lived in the state of Washington, been under 18 — and, of course, been a real person — Adam might have been branded a sex offender. In Washington, minors who engage in the common teen behavior known as sexting can be prosecuted under the state’s child pornography law.

To suggest that a juvenile who sends a sexually explicit selfie is a victim of his own act of child pornography is absurd, but that’s exactly what a trial court in Spokane County has done.

This much should be obvious: Selfies taken by minors are not child pornography.

When he was 17, E.G. sent a text message with a photograph of his erect penis to a young adult woman he knew through his mother. The woman reported the incident to police, and the prosecutor chose to charge E.G. with the felony sex offense of dealing in depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct — a law typically used to prosecute child pornographers.

That’s right: E.G. was named as both the perpetrator and the victim of the crime of child pornography. He was convicted and required to register as a sex offender after the trial court rejected a motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence.

The ACLU of Washington has filed a friend of the court brief in State of Washington v. E.G. asking the state court of appeals to reverse the trial court decision and dismiss E.G.’s conviction.

The purpose of Washington’s child pornography law is to prevent minors from being sexually exploited or abused for someone else’s personal gratification or commercial gain, not to criminalize young people for experimenting with their sexuality.

This much should be obvious: Selfies taken by minors are not child pornography. No crime is being committed when a teen photographs himself of his own volition. Nudity alone is not criminalized, even among minors.

What E.G. did is actually fairly common behavior among young people today. The average teen now sends approximately 60 text messages every day. Among teens who have sent nude or semi-nude text messages, 66 percent of girls and 60 percent of boys say they did so to be “fun or flirtatious,” and 40 percent of girls say they sent sexually suggestive texts as a “joke,” much like Hannah does, later in the episode.

Criminal justice officials are beginning to recognize that child pornography laws are not meant to address teen sexting. The president of the National District Attorneys Association has publicly urged prosecutors to use their discretion to avoid criminal charges in many such cases. Courts are also finding that sexting should not be handled through child pornography prosecutions. And 20 states — but not Washington — have enacted new laws that provide a range of charging and sentencing alternatives to prosecutors that avoid the sledgehammer impact of a felony child pornography charge and conviction in sexting cases.

It’s time for Washington’s courts to appreciate what a five-year-old scene from “Girls” implies: Sending a sexually explicit selfie may be immature or unwise, but it’s only human to behave that way sometimes.

View comments (23)
Read the Terms of Use


Why do schools get away with teaching kids about sex and giving them condoms. Why do we have same sex marriage. Why do you let these people have the power to do these things that are all normal that God gave to us. Why don't you people just leave them alone. Your destroying lifes because of a thought your thinking when they weren't. You should be in jail for exportation of innocent people life's. My God let them live. Have you forgotten your mistakes? What makes you people so Holy and self righteous?


I'm a mother of 2 boys, 23 and 12 and 2 girls 20 and 8 and as long as they were and are minors, if they were to send any nudes, the courts would be the least of their problems and if some kid sends them a nude, the only person who would be in jail.....Would be me after I handled it. They can explore their sexuality all they want when they are a consenting adult with any other consenting adult they choose. Heck, they can explore their little hearts out. It's very simple, they are children and pictures of them in a sexually explicit way is indeed pornography. Period, this isn't rocket science, it's common sense.

Jonathan Kaplan

I don't find it funny when parents, even jokingly, threaten their children with violence, and I'd urge you to reconsider the kind of language you use to express your strong desire to not have your children engage in particular behaviors. I'd further note that if you believe that your children will refrain from experimenting with their sexuality until they are adults, you are likely delusional, and that by not creating a safe space for them to talk with you about their actual practices, you very likely make the kinds of poor decisions discussed above more, and not less, likely. So I'd urge you to reconsider your substantive position here as well.


I agree with Mother of two boys, and 2 girls, I also work with juvenile sex offenders. There are many no touch offenses, and there is a strong law that prevents, or attempts to prevent minors over twelve from any sexual contact with minors under twelve with specific attention on the four year age gap. In this society where people like to think children are being sexual until their teens, the child aggressive sexual predator has slipped between the cracks. People need to pay attention to, and care about children who have been neglected and physically abused, and those who have been molested, because there are very young predators, and child incest often leads to that. Sending a text of ones genitals could easily be part of their grooming process. Read this book if you want to understand the process of dealing with (Sexually Aggressive Children: Coming To Understand. Araji, Sharon). Social media is an easy place for predators to hook up with our children and youth. There is a clear and distinct law about child pornography, and I am all for protecting children who daily get used and abused sexually by adults, same age peers and older youth.


And Dear Anonymous, You clearly lack the common sense to understand that a minor sexting himself does not constitute a criminal offense against himself. Have you thought about supporting Sharia law, as well? You already do? Case closed.


This seems over the top, especially if you're branded a sex offender for life.



Some friend of the mother... A friend would of contacted the kids mom, her "friend" and explained the problem.....after repeating the pic, of course, then blo led the kds number.....if he didn't know the potential results of setting, even with a willing partner, then he would after the first sect! Good god people, let's come up with new and noval ways to make a bad situation worse why don't we?!?


In this and in all other matters sexual, it advised to fall back on the immortal wisdom of Cheech and Chong, who memorably stated "bailiff whack his pee pee"


The title is misleading and doesn't actually argue anything about sexting. If anything, it argues child pornography and how that ties into sexting. It doesn't take into account unsolicited photos, harassment, revenge porn, etc. The argument is simply lacking.


Something needs to be done, the internet it's self needs to be protected from Big Business


Stay Informed