Donald Trump Continues His Assault on the Most Vulnerable Among Us

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division was created 60 years ago “to uphold the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans, particularly some of the most vulnerable members of our society.” Under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the department is now signaling its intent to use civil rights laws as a cudgel against racial minorities.

The news that Sessions is preparing to create a new section in the DOJ to investigate and punish universities for using race as one of a number of factors in admissions decisions is deeply disturbing and contrary to Supreme Court rulings. After all, the court has repeatedly supported the compelling interest colleges have in achieving racial diversity through carefully constructed admission plans. And the Justice Department itself in 2015 supported admissions programs, like that of the University of Texas, noting that “[n]umerous federal agencies have concluded that well-qualified graduates from diverse backgrounds are crucial to the fulfillment of their missions.”

The Trump administration is using the law in a way that most burdens those who are most vulnerable.

But that was then. Now, evidently, in Sessions’s view, the greatest civil rights problem the nation faces is the possibility that a college or university might consider the contributions that students of color would make to those institutions as a factor in admissions.

But the decision to attack diversity programs on campuses is, sadly, not surprising in the context of the policies articulated by this administration. It has, after all, created a commission to investigate voting fraud that doesn't occur, even while numerous lawsuits have been successfully brought challenging voting schemes that rob minorities and other vulnerable groups of their ballot access. This is an administration that now wants to return to long discredited “war on drugs” that filled America’s prisons and unfairly targeted communities of color. And this is a Justice Department operating under a president, who despite irrefutable evidence of inappropriate use of force against minorities, has told law enforcement agents “don’t be too nice” in interactions with civilians.

This latest move by the administration is of a piece with those actions and others — such as efforts to strip LGBT communities of civil rights' protections. The common thread is using the law in a way that most burdens those who are most vulnerable. The aim is to turn back the clock to a time when the most vulnerable were denied even the most basic access to the benefits of being American.

There is a frightening precedent for this retreat. Following a brief period after the Civil War when some efforts were made to achieve equality for newly freed slaves, there was a cruel and sudden turn to erase all progress on that front. That post-Reconstruction turn frequently relied on twisting existing laws to deprive newly enfranchised Blacks of all civil rights, including the right to vote. And that effort ushered in Jim Crow laws, brutal law enforcement, lynchings, denials of access to jobs, housing, education, and public accommodations.

Much remains to be done to achieve real equality in this country, and we cannot allow earlier gains to be systematically undone. We will be watching and taking appropriate actions to prevent the Trump administration from taking America back into its shameful past.

Add a comment (13)
Read the Terms of Use

Diversity

A black man and white man enter a room and are given identical standardized written/computerized tests. Who ever gets the highest score wins.

That's how free competition in a republic works.

Anonymous

Strawman, and completely irrelevant to the topic. But I'm guessing you know that, and don't really care.

Anonymous

White Privilege in all its hideous glory

Jane N Singleton

Well, slap my face is that how free competition in a republic is supposed to work? Well, shut my mouth, I'll be. I bet my daughter hasn't read this either.

Anonymous

Except when the standardized tests are written with a bias that favours those who have had opportunities denied to others.

Anonymous

Oh like the ones that have questions like...

Sally has 3 apples worth 1 dollar each. She sells 2 apples to Herbert. How many dollars does Sally have?

Ghetto standard translation...

Tyron has 3 grams of coke worth 50 dollars each. He sells 2 grams to Sally. How many dollars does Tyron have?

Nice.

Michelle

This is a ridiculous statement. The test are not biased, and only favor those with the right answers. You had the same opportunity of a sh*tty public education that the rest of the races had.

Anonymous

News flash;
WHITE PEOPLE HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS

Anonymous

Maybe I should clarify what I meant by that.
White people have civil rights ALSO
Government sanctioned Discrimination against whites and asians on the basis of race is UNJUST

Anonymous

don't tell that to non-consensually chipped people - they have melted the minds of doctors, lawyers, engineers, computer specialists, nurses, teachers, on and on -- of all races and creeds with that technological mess and f*** their a**** while they were at it - tortured their family members - watched women f** themselves to stay out of prison for embezzlement, pedophilia, bribing government officials, physical and psychological abuse -- and proud of what they have done

Pages

Sign Up for Breaking News