South Carolina Legislature Repeals Racist ‘Disturbing School’ Law for Students

In 2015, video surfaced of a police officer violently dragging a Black girl from her school desk. He was arresting her, and using shockingly excessive force, because she was “disturbing school,” a vague law that more or less made it a crime for a student to be loud, to talk back to staff or school police. In other words, it criminalized being a kid. 

Unsurprisingly, this law has disproportionately affected students of color, who are already over-policed outside the school walls, so we sued in August 2016. Last week, we scored a victory on behalf of all students who have been pulled into the maze of the state’s criminal justice system.

On Thursday, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster signed an amendment repealing the crime of disturbing schools for students in the state of South Carolina. The importance of this law being signed cannot be understated. Its passage will eliminate a major source of the school-to-prison pipeline, which has caused grievous and lifelong harm to students across South Carolina. 

In addition to the immediate harms of being arrested and subjected to the criminal justice system, students are also subject to more severe discipline that can include expulsion or assignment to alternative programs that fail to provide a pathway to graduation. Stigma and further disconnect from school are also likely to follow, increasingly jeopardizing school success. And a criminal record alone can close the door to employment, college, and housing opportunities. 

When we filed our lawsuit, thousands of youth were arrested each year for things like talking to another student after being sent out of class, cursing in the lunchroom, and even for speaking out against police misconduct.  The vague terms of the law, which criminalized youth considered disturbing or obnoxious at school, also allowed for disparate and discriminatory enforcement. 

Our review found that across the state, Black youth were nearly four times as likely as their white classmates to be deemed criminally disturbing school. In Charleston, Black youth were a staggering six times more likely to be charged with the offense, and disturbing school was the number one reason youth entered the juvenile justice system. 

Sadly yet unsurprisingly, the circumstances in South Carolina are consistent with those found in many other jurisdictions. Across the country, Black youth and students of color, as well as students with disabilities, are more likely to be disciplined and arrested in school. Our culture of mass punishment that starts in schools is partly to blame. The law’s wording itself is also partly to blame. Disparities are more likely to be found when an offense is defined using subjective terms, allowing implicit bias to creep in and be weaponized by the Orwellian-named “school resource officers,” who are nothing more than cops in school. 

In South Carolina and elsewhere, the impacts are devastating for youth. For example, when children are pushed into the juvenile justice system from school, they are less likely to graduate and more likely to have future involvement with the criminal justice system. Fortunately, research on adolescent development has led to the creation of many school-based approaches to youth behavior that are more effective for both schools and children. 

In the year after we filed our lawsuit, the Department of Juvenile Justice reported a sharp decline in disturbing schools arrests. Schools, police, and communities were beginning to change their approach to school children.  The repeal of the disturbing schools crime for students is a further substantial step in the right direction for South Carolina’s students. We will continue to fight to ensure that no young person is treated as a criminal simply for being a child. No child’s education should be disturbed by racist and backward, and now illegal, “disturbing schools” laws anywhere in this country. 

View comments (45)
Read the Terms of Use

Snow Parrott

The vagueness in the law as previously written allows for schools to use their prejudiced views against students of color and, most importantly, of disabilities to be punished for normal behavior. Both groups are unable to receive a free and appropriate public education without a battle in the State of S.C., and removing this non-specific law that does not define terms operationally is a step in the right direction.

Snow Parrott

S.C. is losing teachers by the masses because the segregated system for students with disabilities that pervasively exists throughout the state does not provide the necessary support for the teachers. Conversely, inclusive education applies needed support and equality to teachers while delivering the proper support to students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment alongside their neighboring typical peer and increasing the educational achievement to all students. Again, this is the reason S.C. is losing teachers and is ranked 50th in the USA for public education. The removal of the “Disturbing School Law” is as much about the prejudice that exists in this state towards individuals of color as it is about individuals with disabilities and IEPs in schools.

Anonymous

What about the black kids that don’t want to be disrupted and just want to go to school?

Anonymous

Reading through these comments is heartbreaking. If any one of you placed YOUR child or one of your friends/family member's child in this position you would say they were acting as a child. You would say the teacher(s) need to "get a grip." But due to concentrated hatred of a group you all have deemed "less than," you truly are in concert with all your society does to Black Aboriginals. Your ancestors started this hatred because they needed a reason for subjugating other human beings...for profit. Why do you continue this farce?

Anonymous

ACLU calls such laws racist, where color is NOT mentioned in the law, only presumed in application of the law. Filing lawsuits to do away with such disturbing laws causing grievous lifelong harm to all who suffer the consequences. Yet ACLU says and does absolutely nothing about truly racist laws on the books for decades causing such grievous harm. Racist not just in application, but clearly of absolute unquestionable racist intent from numerous accounts of official records. Laws discussed on the record in racial slurs, directed in passage at specifically identified groups. By ethnicity, race, political order, gender preference, and religious affiliation.

ACLU is okay with all of this. With the grievous lifelong harm and suffering of tens of millions of Americans affected by such laws. Disproportionately harming blacks and minorities, because that is exactly who the clearly expressed intent and purpose of the subject laws were directed at. Duh.

Anyone interested can find the material evidence by searching online for history of the marijuana laws. Government records compiled by University of Law professors reflect an outrageous extent of lies and deceit authorities have engaged in for personal and political power. From Harry Anslinger, to President Richard Nixon, the undeniable records of racist intent of marijuana laws and disregard of truth and facts is appalling. Including Nixon's own tape recordings, you can hear his racial homophobic slurs and antisemitic remarks for yourself.

Then ask if such lies and laws are reasonable grounds to justify incarceration, criminal records, ruining lives, and denying medical relief and medicine to countless suffering Americans.

Pages

Stay Informed