What Donald Trump, Mike Pence, and Betsy DeVos Won't Tell You About 'School Choice'

Indiana has one of the most expansive private school voucher programs in the country, courtesy of Mike Pence. During his time as governor, Pence “removed the cap on the number of students who could qualify for a voucher to a private school, increased the limits on qualifying family income, and removed [a] stipulation that the student had to try the public school first,” according to a searing analysis of the state’s school choice failures by The Washington Post yesterday.

The result?

Last year alone, Indiana taxpayers financed private school education — nearly all religious — to the tune of $146.1 million “with most of it going to families who would have sent their children to private school anyway.” Oh, and by the way, a 2017 study of Indiana students in grades 3-8 who actually did use the voucher to transfer from a public to a private school showed that the voucher program had a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.

Those are the type of important details you didn’t hear or read last week from voucher proponents who dubbed the week, “National School Choice Week.” President Trump issued an official proclamation recognizing the “celebration,” while school choice supporters, such as Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and Pence, wrote op-eds and deluged social media with platitudes about empowering parents and helping children achieve the “American dream.” There’s no question that parents should feel empowered when it comes to their child’s education, or that every student should be positioned to pursue their dreams, but that is not what the “school choice” movement is really about.

Rather “school choice” is a catch-all phrase that covers a variety of efforts to effectively privatize public education by diverting public education funds to private sources. It includes home schooling, charter schools, and virtual education, but it is mostly code for private school vouchers and similar programs, such as education savings accounts and tax credit scholarship programs. The school choice movement has been around for decades, working to expand its reach school district by school district and state by state.

With the election of President Trump and Vice President Pence and the appointment of Secretary DeVos, the movement has received an alarming boost. But it’s not the panacea that Trump and others claim. And privatizing public education in this way has serious consequences for students, civil rights, equality, and religious liberty.

As an initial matter, decades of studies show that vouchers generally do not improve educational outcomes. For example, a 2017 evaluation of the D.C. Scholarship Opportunity Program found a statistically significant negative impact on math achievement for voucher students overall. Likewise, kindergarten through fifth-grade students, who comprise the majority of the students in the program, were beset by statistically significant negative impacts in both reading and math. Meanwhile, participation in the voucher program had no statistically significant effect on student or parent satisfaction or students’ perception of safety.

Studies of voucher programs in Louisiana, Ohio, and Milwaukee, among others, likewise found negative or negligible impacts on students’ academic performance. Indeed, a Wall Street Journal analysis of Milwaukee’s program, published yesterday, found that “vouchers worked best when enrollment from voucher students was kept low.” However, “[a]s the percentage of voucher students rises, the returns diminish until the point when there is little difference between the performance of public and private institutions.” And, “[t]he vast majority of private schools participating in the program today have high percentages of publicly funded students.”

In other words, to be even mildly successful, voucher programs will not be able to assist all students. They cannot be the cure-all that proponents promise because the more voucher students a school takes on, the greater the negative impact on students’ academic performance.

Civil rights protections are also undermined by school voucher programs. Private voucher schools do not have the same obligations as public schools under federal law to protect students from harassment and discrimination. Unlike public schools, private voucher schools can discriminate against students based on their religion, LGBT status, disability, academic achievement, and disciplinary history. In fact, according to a 2016 report issued by the Government Accountability Office, only four voucher programs across the country required private schools to accept all students with vouchers, space permitting. Students in voucher schools also lose key First Amendment rights, due process rights, and other rights protected by the U.S. Constitution in public schools.

Accountability is virtually non-existent in many of these voucher programs, increasing the risk that the few rights retained by voucher students will be violated, that taxpayer funds will be mismanaged, and that the quality of the education provided by the school will be inferior. For instance, many voucher schools that receive taxpayer funds are not required to meet any standards for teacher qualifications, testing, or achievement. In some states, private school teachers need not even have a bachelor’s degree, and only 11 states require that voucher schools be accredited, meaning that voucher funds are often used to pay for tuition at unaccredited schools.

Many voucher schools, moreover, are religious. Schools not only discriminate against students and employees based on religion and other grounds, as noted above, but they also do not have to meet the same curricular requirements that public schools do. Many religious voucher schools, for example, teach creationism in science class. They also incorporate religious worship into the curriculum in the form of chapel, daily prayer, or daily scriptural readings and infringe upon basic principles of religious liberty by providing public funds for sectarian proselytizing.

These are just some of the facts about vouchers and school choice that President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Secretary DeVos won’t tell you. We’ll continue to shine a light on how these programs fail students and undermine our public schools as proponents push them without regard to their effects on students’ academic performance, civil rights, and religious liberty.

View comments (42)
Read the Terms of Use

Dr. Timothy Leary

Donald Trump is so full of shit that you can't tell how much is bullshit and how much is just plain shit.

Anonymous

Sounds just like a Liberal nobody on LSD. Guess you want to fall backwards into that Obama paradise.

Dr. Timothy Leary

I am not a liberal nobody. I am just a nobody, but at least I know the Donald Trump is a chump.

Lady Logic

Dr. Leary, you have put the thoughts in my head on a webpage.

Anonymous

The ACLU should approach public education with the same perspective it has with public prayer. Education involves value judgements and morals (right and wrong) as well as training in attitudes toward public policy. Just as the First Amendment is interpreted as building a wall of separation between church and state it should be interpreted as building the same wall between speech and state and school and state.
Rather than rail against vouchers and other programs intended to subsidize private education, the ACLU should support such programs as necessary to avoid indue state involvement in education.

Anonymous

You want a wall between school and state, but you want taxpayer dollars to flow freely though the wall from state -> school? That is the issue here. Rights would still be protected for private funding of private schools that teach Creation in Science class. DeVos could use her wealth and private sector connections to create some massive private scholarship fund the provides 'vouchers' to kids that can't afford private school, but want to attend. No problem with that. I bet it would be very successful.

Thomas Schneider

You stated that education must have a moral component, If that is the case you must not be a supporter of Donald Trump as he is a chronic liar, braggs about sexually abusing women, sex with a porn star and paying her to be silent. What in the world are you thinking of?

Anonymous

SCOTUS already voted on prayer in public school

Anonymous

Reading, writing, and, arithmetic are not moral values. If you want your children to be taught YOUR values... teach them at home. Schools are not meant to raise your children, YOU are. The main point I got from this article is merely that school vouchers don't improve academic performance in things like reading and math. Of course, improving academic performance isn't the point of school vouchers; the point of school vouchers is to take public funding and apply it to private, often religiously affiliated schools that are more concerned with proselytizing religious dogma than teaching objective reality, like math. Since churches don't pay taxes, why should religious schools get public funding? Typical right wing hypocrisy.

Bartelby the Sc...

If the supreme court ruled that Hobby Lobby doesn't have to pay for insurance that includes birth control because it is against their beliefs, then why hasn't there been a federal lawsuit brought by taxpayers opposed to the use of their public tax dollars going to fund religious voucher schools?
As someone who was "raised" in a fundamentalist "christian" home, public school was my only respite from the onslaught of intellectual abuse. Public school, and public school teachers saved my life.

Pages

Stay Informed