What Donald Trump, Mike Pence, and Betsy DeVos Won't Tell You About 'School Choice'

Indiana has one of the most expansive private school voucher programs in the country, courtesy of Mike Pence. During his time as governor, Pence “removed the cap on the number of students who could qualify for a voucher to a private school, increased the limits on qualifying family income, and removed [a] stipulation that the student had to try the public school first,” according to a searing analysis of the state’s school choice failures by The Washington Post yesterday.

The result?

Last year alone, Indiana taxpayers financed private school education — nearly all religious — to the tune of $146.1 million “with most of it going to families who would have sent their children to private school anyway.” Oh, and by the way, a 2017 study of Indiana students in grades 3-8 who actually did use the voucher to transfer from a public to a private school showed that the voucher program had a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.

Those are the type of important details you didn’t hear or read last week from voucher proponents who dubbed the week, “National School Choice Week.” President Trump issued an official proclamation recognizing the “celebration,” while school choice supporters, such as Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and Pence, wrote op-eds and deluged social media with platitudes about empowering parents and helping children achieve the “American dream.” There’s no question that parents should feel empowered when it comes to their child’s education, or that every student should be positioned to pursue their dreams, but that is not what the “school choice” movement is really about.

Rather “school choice” is a catch-all phrase that covers a variety of efforts to effectively privatize public education by diverting public education funds to private sources. It includes home schooling, charter schools, and virtual education, but it is mostly code for private school vouchers and similar programs, such as education savings accounts and tax credit scholarship programs. The school choice movement has been around for decades, working to expand its reach school district by school district and state by state.

With the election of President Trump and Vice President Pence and the appointment of Secretary DeVos, the movement has received an alarming boost. But it’s not the panacea that Trump and others claim. And privatizing public education in this way has serious consequences for students, civil rights, equality, and religious liberty.

As an initial matter, decades of studies show that vouchers generally do not improve educational outcomes. For example, a 2017 evaluation of the D.C. Scholarship Opportunity Program found a statistically significant negative impact on math achievement for voucher students overall. Likewise, kindergarten through fifth-grade students, who comprise the majority of the students in the program, were beset by statistically significant negative impacts in both reading and math. Meanwhile, participation in the voucher program had no statistically significant effect on student or parent satisfaction or students’ perception of safety.

Studies of voucher programs in Louisiana, Ohio, and Milwaukee, among others, likewise found negative or negligible impacts on students’ academic performance. Indeed, a Wall Street Journal analysis of Milwaukee’s program, published yesterday, found that “vouchers worked best when enrollment from voucher students was kept low.” However, “[a]s the percentage of voucher students rises, the returns diminish until the point when there is little difference between the performance of public and private institutions.” And, “[t]he vast majority of private schools participating in the program today have high percentages of publicly funded students.”

In other words, to be even mildly successful, voucher programs will not be able to assist all students. They cannot be the cure-all that proponents promise because the more voucher students a school takes on, the greater the negative impact on students’ academic performance.

Civil rights protections are also undermined by school voucher programs. Private voucher schools do not have the same obligations as public schools under federal law to protect students from harassment and discrimination. Unlike public schools, private voucher schools can discriminate against students based on their religion, LGBT status, disability, academic achievement, and disciplinary history. In fact, according to a 2016 report issued by the Government Accountability Office, only four voucher programs across the country required private schools to accept all students with vouchers, space permitting. Students in voucher schools also lose key First Amendment rights, due process rights, and other rights protected by the U.S. Constitution in public schools.

Accountability is virtually non-existent in many of these voucher programs, increasing the risk that the few rights retained by voucher students will be violated, that taxpayer funds will be mismanaged, and that the quality of the education provided by the school will be inferior. For instance, many voucher schools that receive taxpayer funds are not required to meet any standards for teacher qualifications, testing, or achievement. In some states, private school teachers need not even have a bachelor’s degree, and only 11 states require that voucher schools be accredited, meaning that voucher funds are often used to pay for tuition at unaccredited schools.

Many voucher schools, moreover, are religious. Schools not only discriminate against students and employees based on religion and other grounds, as noted above, but they also do not have to meet the same curricular requirements that public schools do. Many religious voucher schools, for example, teach creationism in science class. They also incorporate religious worship into the curriculum in the form of chapel, daily prayer, or daily scriptural readings and infringe upon basic principles of religious liberty by providing public funds for sectarian proselytizing.

These are just some of the facts about vouchers and school choice that President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Secretary DeVos won’t tell you. We’ll continue to shine a light on how these programs fail students and undermine our public schools as proponents push them without regard to their effects on students’ academic performance, civil rights, and religious liberty.

View comments (66)
Read the Terms of Use


One thing not often mentioned is the inequality for taxpayers without children. I’ve paid taxes for decades to support a public education system because that benefits our society.

If parents get the option of directing public funds to their own private benefit, then why aren’t non-parents given that same option??

Send your spawn to private school if you want, but that does not remove parents’ Obligation to public education that we all bear


It's all just a scam, which is all we can expect from the scumbag people Donald surrounds himself with.

John Fraser

It is also true that private schools may discipline or penalize students for arbitrary dress code violations or length of hair violations. While I am sure some violations may distract other students from their schoolwork, many times violations are used arbitrarily to discriminate against minority students by racist administrators who then have no fear of ramifications.


Worked in a voucher school in DC. We taught the Bible, were not accountable for learning through standard assessments, and I wasnt a certified teacher at the time. We were only required to report truancy and fire drills. We can do better.


Devos and Pence wrote Op-Eds saying they were empowering parents to help the kids achieve the "American Dream"..........what a load of horseshit ! There's a reason they call it the American Dream........you have to be asleep to believe it !


This woman has no clue about seeing that ALL children are educated with the same level of learning....NOT !!! BETTER EDUCATION WITH PLENTY !!! OF MONEY !!! SHE IS A DISGRACE IN HER ROLE, AND SHOULD RESIGN !!!


Private school folks have been trying to kill public education for decades. They really don't see the advantages to the non-rich getting an education and they like the government cash they get from vouchers to help pay for their kid's private school.

J. Mark Akers Sr.

Shocker - "Many voucher schools, moreover, are religious." AND:
"They also incorporate religious worship into the curriculum in the form of chapel , daily prayer, or daily scriptural readings..."
Duh. That's the point. Parents can get some help funding their child's education if the do not choose to send them to a school that has only one explanation to how we came to exist, (that being evolution) or if they don't want their child to be coming home from school confused as to whether they are a boy or a girl.
No one will be forced to send their child to such a school.
It is unlikely school choice will destroy the option for sending their child to the public/government schools which in most places in America still possess a complete monopoly of public funding for education.
The folks who seem to oppose school choice the most are hypocrites.
They claim the tax payer must pay for a poor woman's abortion, but must not contribute toward financially assisting a poor family who can not currently afford a private education for their child.


As a parent of a choice student In Milwaukee, I can say that the public school my child would attend in our neighborhood is awful. I know, I worked there. Vouchers may be a political hot point right now, but let’s keep in mind the real life consequences. My child is receiving a better educational experience because of these programs. That’s all that matters to me when I go to that awful school to cast my vote in 2020. ( it’s our neighborhood polling place)


How do you think it got awful? Employees like you?


Stay Informed