Fighting for Emergency Care for Pregnant Women at Catholic Hospitals

When you’re pregnant, what can go wrong is often the last thing you want to think about.  Unfortunately, the unimaginable sometimes happens: you’re in the middle of your pregnancy when all of a sudden your amniotic fluid starts to leak.  You’re in extreme pain.  You start to bleed.  You start to get a fever.  You rush to the nearest hospital.  You’d expect that any hospital emergency room would provide you the proper care.  Right?  Unfortunately, that’s not the case if you end up at a Catholic hospital. 

Today we announced a lawsuit against one of the nation’s largest Catholic health care systems, for imposing religious rules on its staff that prevent doctors from performing an abortion in emergency cases involving miscarriage or other pregnancy complications—even when a woman’s life is at risk. We’re suing Trinity Health Corporation after discovering that it has repeatedly failed to provide women suffering pregnancy complications with appropriate emergency abortion care as required by federal law.   

Trinity Health Corporation, which owns and operates more than 80 hospitals around the country, requires that all of its facilities abide by the Ethical and Religious Directives promulgated by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.   These directives prohibit a doctor working at a Catholic hospital from terminating a woman’s pregnancy even when the failure to do so puts her health or life at risk.    

These directives are written by Catholic bishops, not licensed medical professionals, and should not dictate how doctors practice medicine, especially when it violates federal law.

The failure to provide pregnant women appropriate emergency care, including an abortion when the circumstances warrant, violates a federal law called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, known as EMTALA.  A public health educator in Michigan discovered that at one of Trinity’s hospitals alone, at least five women who were suffering from miscarriages and needed urgent care were denied that care because of the Catholic directives.

Ten of the 25 largest hospital systems in the U.S. are Catholic-sponsored, and nearly one of nine hospital beds in the country is in a Catholic facility. The directives bar doctors at those hospitals from offering — or even discussing — certain reproductive health care services, even when those services are necessary to protect a woman’ s health. As U.S. hospitals become increasingly affiliated with religious organizations, the health of American women is threatened by the refusal to provide medically appropriate and often times lifesaving services.

In December 2013, we sued the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops on behalf of Tamesha Means, a woman who was denied appropriate medical treatment because the only hospital in her county is required by the bishops to follow religious directives that put women’s health at risk. That case is currently on appeal.  Today, we are suing Trinity on behalf of all of our members in every state where Trinity operates to make sure this never happens again, and no woman is ever denied the emergency care she needs.

We all have a right to our religious beliefs, but that does not mean we should be able to use those beliefs to harm others. Legally and morally, saving a woman’s life and health must be every hospital’s first priority.  Every pregnant woman who enters an emergency room should be guaranteed that she will get the care she needs. 

View comments (40)
Read the Terms of Use


it is a shame that media sites like this one twist story details to appeal to the emotions of others.


Do women not have a freakin' right to life? Just how the hell did we get to be the low man on the totem pole? The mother should always have priority. And a hospital should not put anything ahead of the life of the person right there in front of them. Hell, the least they could do is give priority to the person that gonna pay the damn bill. You ain't getting any money out of a fetus.

Patricia foster

I live in Northern Kentucky and a catholic hospital monopoly exists. These same issues exist and women are also forced to leave the state and undergo extra invasive procedures because they refuse to perform tubal ligation's


Great. So when you're in an accident and need urgent care, make sure you have a first aid kit when the nearest Catholic hospital (typically so in rural areas) is closed because of this idiotic lawsuit.


Or it gets taken over by a company or organization that knows what it's doing.


Or an organization that 'knows what they're doing' can build their secular hospital next door.


The real question is why there aren't secular, public hospitals in rural areas. The Catholic Church is filling a void left by the state. The ACLU should be filing a lawsuit against the state for denying women's access to reproductive health services -- and any other health services -- through neglect.

Look, I wouldn't go to a hospital run by Jehovah's Witnesses expecting a blood transfusion. Why would you go to a Catholic hospital expecting an abortion? For all the women this lawsuit represents, there are scores of other Catholic women who choose these hospitals specifically because they abstain from abortions. Let them have their own hospitals.

If the ACLU wins this lawsuit, Catholic hospitals won't change their policies. They will simply close. Why is the ACLU pursuing further destruction of our already weak health care system instead of pushing the state to open more secular, public hospitals?


Secular organizations don't have massive piles of stolen money to dump into building and maintaining hospitals.




Secular hospitals have taxpayer money. Where are those taxes going? We have a right to demand secular, taxpayer-funded, public hospitals in rural areas. So sad to see the ACLU doesn't get this.


Stay Informed