A New Year's Resolution for a New Sex Ed Policy

A new year is exciting because it provides an opportunity for reflection and holds the possibility of change and a fresh start for the coming year. We are at this exciting crossroads with many important civil liberties issues, and sexuality education is one of them. A recent study released in Pediatrics provides yet another opportunity to reflect on the abysmal failure of federally funded abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. The study looks specifically at virginity pledges, which are often a part of federally funded abstinence-only programs. These pledges are just what they sound like: teens pledge to refrain from sexual activity until marriage. Guess what? These pledges don't work, and can actually lead teens to make bad decisions.

The study, conducted by Janet Elise Rosenbaum, Ph.D., a researcher at Harvard and Johns Hopkins Universities compared virginity pledgers to nonpledgers with similar demographic characteristics and similar attitudes about sex and contraception. The study found that pledgers are not less sexually active than nonpledgers with similar characteristics. Moreover, the study found that five years after taking a pledge, 82 percent of pledgers deny having ever taken a virginity pledge. Though the pledgers may have forgotten they took a pledge to remain virgins, they did not forgot the message in abstinence-only programs that tell students that contraceptives and condoms don't work: the study found — quite frighteningly — that the pledgers were less likely to use condoms and birth control than their nonpledging peers. Rosenbaum suggests that this may be true because pledgers have been subjected to abstinence-only programs, and as a result have developed negative attitudes about the effectiveness of condoms and contraceptives. Indeed, federally funded abstinence-only programs cannot mention contraceptives except to discuss their failure rates, and many programs use shame and fear to communicate this information.

This new study, while interesting and important, is simply one more in a long line of studies that show that our government's abstinence-only policy is a failure. The federal government has wasted more than $1.5 billion on these programs, despite study after study showing that these programs don't work. For years our government has allowed politics and religion to trump science. But this is a new year and a new federal government. As the new administration and Congress settle in we should insist that they put an end to the abstinence-only-until-marriage debacle, and instead focus on giving our teens what they need: tools to help them make healthy and responsible decisions.

View comments (3)
Read the Terms of Use

True American

I wonder when your terroris, racist regime leader Obama screws everything up are you going to say that the federal government is messing up and that he is a waste. No you wont, I bet we will not hear another bad word about the government or the regime leader. You people are pathetic.

I just read your statement above that keeps us from stating the truth about people like Obama and other moronic liberals. What a joke you can Bush bash all you want but then say we cant discuss things like candidates. Hello idiots when you bash the federal government, Republicans and Bush, that is showing a preference you morons. Again you show that you do not pratice what you preach.

By the way you have no buisness discussing Gitmo at all, it is not an american civil union issue you liberal idiots. They are prisoners of war, not convicted felons in the the U.S. that you like to coddle and protect. You people are truly worthless.

Sane Conservative

We can only pray (yes ACLU, I used a bad word) that Mr. O'Bama's radical ideas were only to get elected, and that he uses more real-world approaches, to keep America secure from terrorism, as we have been since 9-11. I also pray that with him in office, groups like the ACLU don't completely destroy American traditions that support the traditional family structure and values.

Hopefully, American civil liberties will not continue to be extended to foreign citizens, especially those who are our enemies in this time of war.

Liberal Idealist

American Civil Liberties Union, Change you name. You are protecting HUMAN RIGHTS! Cls sound weaker the HUMAN RIGHTS!

Stay Informed