Kansas Prosecutors Are Locking People Up Rather Than Offering — Or Even Telling Them About — Diversion

Last year, Melissa Braham was driving from Colorado to Missouri with her boyfriend and her two children. The car broke down in Kansas, and then her life broke down as well. 

A passerby called the police after allegedly smelling marijuana, and Ms. Braham was charged with possession of the marijuana and paraphernalia. She spent a month in jail pulling together her $2,500 bail and other fees, and eventually, she took a plea deal with six months of probation. This kept her confined to Kansas, a state where she knew no one.

She soon lost her job in Colorado. And then, horrifically, the state of Kansas took her children from her, placing them in foster care and a new, strange school. The family remains separated today.  

Melissa Braham had no adult criminal record when she was prosecuted by Wilson County’s elected county attorney, Kenley Thompson. Her charges were extremely low-level. Given these facts, she was a good candidate for a program called “diversion,” by which defendants sign an agreement with prosecutors to stay out of trouble for a period of time, sometimes paying restitution, entering helpful counseling, or both.  

If defendants successfully meet these requirements, the prosecutor dismisses the charges. And that’s the beauty of diversion. It’s an intelligent and necessary alternative to pursuing expensive and disproportionately harsh prosecutions that seek to maximize punishment and jail or prison time rather than rehabilitation and long-term safety. In Kansas, prosecutors would save $8.9 million annually if they simply offered felony diversion in line with the national average of 9 percent, to say nothing of misdemeanors like Ms. Braham’s.

But Thompson never even notified Ms. Braham of the existence of his county’s diversion program, despite the fact that notice is required by Kansas law. In 1980, the Kansas Supreme Court recognized that the notice requirement helps create a “uniform procedure to provide an alternative to formal conviction,” and the Kansas Attorney General’s Office has told the county attorneys under its authority that the purpose of the notification requirement is to “safeguard a defendant from discrimination by a prosecutor.” Therefore all county attorneys “must comply with the statutory diversion requirements.”

In effect, a prosecutor’s failure to notify defendants of the options that diversion programs offer represents an act of prejudice against the defendant. When the ACLU informed County Attorney Thompson that we were preparing to file a lawsuit on behalf of Ms. Braham, he did the right thing and agreed to overhaul his diversion programs to comply with the law. But stories like Ms. Braham’s are unfortunately far too common in Kansas, and the under-utilization of diversion by Kansas prosecutors is widespread.

So today, the ACLU and the ACLU of Kansas sued  Thompson’s colleague Larry Markle of neighboring Montgomery County, one of many elected prosecutors across the state who are ignoring Kansas’ diversion statute. Our clients are Karena Wilson, a 19-year-old girl who was never notified of her diversion options on a first-time theft charge, and Kansas Crossroads Foundation, a faith-based organization that has expended time and resources counseling currently and formerly incarcerated folks who could have otherwise benefitted from diversion in Montgomery County.

Through this litigation, we are seeking to hold Kansas prosecutors accountable for their flagrant disregard for Kansas law, while also seeking a broader commitment from elected attorneys across the state to reform their practices and implement more inclusive, smarter diversion programs, rather than making the repeated choice to perpetuate mass incarceration. Indeed, we hope Kansas can be a model for the nation.

That’s because hiding the ball on diversion is not only illegal, it’s also bad policy. Diversion is a time-tested approach to law enforcement that reduces swelling prison populations, saves taxpayer money, and ultimately makes the community safer by keeping families together and giving folks the continuity and treatment they need to avoid reoffending. Diversion also frees up police and prosecutors to concentrate on more serious cases that truly will improve public safety.

State Rep. John Rubin (R-Shawnee) summarized it well:  “It’s obviously better for the individual if we can get them treatment in the community where possible. It’s closer to home with more supports and that sort of thing. And it’s also better for society and public safety. It’s better all the way around.”

Study after study after study, including by the ACLU of Kansas, has shown that diversion is often the smarter choice. And yet, elected prosecutors across the county too often choose to pursue jail or prison time instead, blindly following the discredited, tough-on-crime approaches that have fueled America’s mass incarceration crisis.      

Prosecutors have enormous power over the criminal justice system, and they can and should be held accountable for their actions — through litigation, legislation, and the ballot box — to ensure they pursue smarter, more humane approaches to safety and justice. Diversion is a giant leap in that direction.

The ACLU’s Campaign for Smart Justice is a multi-year project to cut America’s jail and prison population in half while reducing racial disparities in the system. Following efforts in New Orleans and Orange County, California, today’s lawsuit is the third the ACLU has filed since October as part of a nationwide effort to hold prosecutors accountable and reform our broken system.

View comments (17)
Read the Terms of Use

Dr. Timothy Leary

I smoked marijuana once. It made me want to rape and kill.


apparently, You didn't understand the crime. Did you forget about the children. Maybe Mrs.Braham should have thought about her children when she put them in harms way. Illegal drugs and small children don't mix. I totally agree with prosecutor on this case. Someone has to think about the children. This is the very reason why we are having so many school shootings. These children need strong human values. No one should ever put drugs in front of their children. i believe Mrs. Brahams failed to be a responsible parent and she did this to herself.


Apparently, YOU don't understand the crime! Not a big deal. Smoking pot while driving, is no big deal. Some people do better stoned than you think. That's how I got a college degree, I could concentrate better, 3.9 GPA. Get a life.


Did you read the same article? Did you read the part where the prosecuter neglected his legal duty? The prosecuter violated the law by failing to do his job. Drug use is a problem and usually a diversion requires drug treatment or counseling paid for by the defendant. Don't you think that rehabilitation is more likely if she hadn't lost her job and her kids? Who pays for the cost of her kids in foster care, and now they are on medicaid and we have to pay for her incarceration. It doesn't make moral or fiscal sense to take this path with someone with no criminal record. If you are a Christian are you concerned about obeying the greatest commandments? Will you obey the Lord? Will you love God with all your heart, mind and soul? Will you love your neighbor as yourself? Will you love your enemies with a benelovent love? If you don't care to do these things perhaps you should consider what your eternal destination will be?


Hey Weirdo, They didn't say that she shouldn't have been arrested. They said that she should've been offered a Diversion instead of jail time as a first offender. There's a difference.


Jail/prison is diversion for most normal people. For some criminals, it seems not. But the ACLU wants us to believe we should be on the criminal's side; feel sorry for them. They will tell you imprisonment is too costly. You know what's costly? Insurance paying out because a criminal damaged or stole your property. Insurance paying your medical bills after a criminal injured you. Insurance premiums going up because of these bills. Having to take off work because a criminal injured you. Having to pay to replace damaged or stolen property because the insurance money did not cover it all. Paying for the criminal's SSI or EBT. The list goes on. But the ACLU wants to stand up for the wrong people.


Land of the free, maybe we need fewer laws.


If she lived in Colorado how could the State of Kansas ensure she kept up her end of the diversion deal?


Easy. By moving it to Colorado and they would make sure. Duh


Marijuana and school shootings do not even belong in the same sentence.....lets imprison all the marijuana users but also meth heads on the hand...let's take children from parents and create angry..confused..detached children who then start the cycle all over again...the anonymous comment below is full stupidity and pure ignorance


Stay Informed