Court Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Unconstitutional Spying Law

Today, a federal court today dismissed our lawsuit challenging the unconstitutional government spying law known as the FISA Amendments Act (FAA). Congress passed the law last year, effectively legalizing the secret warrantless surveillance program approved by President Bush in late 2001. The FAA also gave the government new, sweeping spying powers, including the power to conduct dragnet surveillance of Americans' international emails and phone calls.

We filed our lawsuit last July — less than an hour after it was signed into law by then-President Bush on behalf of a broad coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose ability to perform their work, which relies on confidential communications, is greatly compromised by the FAA.

Although the government does not generally have to reveal who it spies on under the highly secretive FAA, the district court judge dismissed the case because he ruled that plaintiffs could not prove with certainty that they had been spied on. The decision states, "[t]he plaintiffs' failure to show that they are subject to the FAA in any concrete way is sufficient to conclude that the plaintiffs lack standing to challenge the FAA."

ACLU National Security Project Director and counsel in the case Jameel Jaffer stated in a press release:

We are disappointed by today's ruling, which will allow the mass acquisition of Americans' international e-mails and telephone calls to continue unchecked. To say, as the court says, that plaintiffs can't challenge this statute unless they can show that their own communications have been collected under it is to say that this statute may not be subject to judicial review at all. The vast majority of people whose communications are intercepted under this statute will never know about it — in fact it's possible that no one will ever be able to make the showing that the court says is required.

The court's decision effectively means that Americans' privacy rights will be left to the mercy of the political branches. This is deeply troubling, because the courts have a crucial role to play in ensuring that individual rights are not needlessly infringed upon by statutes enacted in the name of national security.

While today's decision is disappointing, it's important to emphasize that the court did not uphold the legality of the FAA. Instead, it simply refused to reach the issue. We are considering the options available to us, including a possible appeal. In the meantime, it is now more important than ever for Congress to engage in meaningful oversight of executive spying.

To learn more about our plaintiffs and the issues at stake, visit

Add a comment (6)
Read the Terms of Use


The court's decision on standing is absurd. I'm a lawyer. Two years ago I had a legal intern from China who used a email address. I explained that there were news reports that China was spying on email, and that for me to communicate with him through his email would be legal malpractice. How could I have confidence that Chinese agents were not reading these emails?

We've reached the same point here. I can't use online communications with clients without a reasonable fear the government is spying on those conversations. To do so would constitute malpractice. How does that not form the basis for standing?


I bet that when 911 happend many people in governement thoght it was a great oppurtunity to pull a lot of crap that they would't get away with if not for the hysteria caused by Ben Laden.

anon nurse

There is something known as group stalking that is taking place in communities all across this country. When will the ACLU step up to the plate to help the many victims of these campaigns of psychological harassment?

It would seem that these are well-funded, well-coordinated efforts. Some have suggested that there may be governmental involvement.

These stalking groups must be exposed and stopped.

Surveillance Target

A book that will be of interest to organized gang stalking targets (surveillance targets) is Bridging The Gap by Gmb Bailey.


Frozen winter is coming,do you like to buy ugg to preventing cold and keeping warm.As a pursuer for the most stylish ,is there any ugg boots you have in mind?I think you have no excuse anymore if you don't have a pair of UGG Bailey Button Boots.The Bailey Button UGG can be worn as a UGG classic short Boots or UGG classic mini Boots . Hottest pop style.If you like the UGG tall boots, can provide high quality of Ugg Tall Boots in low price,Are you straitened for Ugg Boots Insoles,don't worry ,we have the best Ugg Boots Insoles on sale ,many of which are hand made by craftspeople.RealUGG,Inc came up with some new-styles- Ugg Lo Pro Button , Ugg Women's Rainier, We offer a wide range of UGG Boots in different color and styles. Browse the website, we are sure you will find Real UGG to tempt you!


Yes, its true I believe we all must be-aware of the dangers of ever advancing technology. The biggest problem is that even corporations and groups may get a hold of these technologies and invade citizens rights.

There should be organizations set up to regulate and monitor these technologies.

I am a victim and I hope that people know all about this subject.

Sign Up for Breaking News