Freedom Alert: Why Marriage Matters

Three Couples. Three minutes. They show us in their video why marriage matters. Why we must save the fundamental right to marry in California on Election Day.

If you get an error message while attempting to view this clip, please reload the page or press F5.
mytubethumbplay
%3Cembed%20src%3D%22%2Ffiles%2Fswfobject%2Fmediaplayer.swf%22%20width%3D%22360%22%20height%3D%22296%22%20type%3D%22application%2Fx-shockwave-flash%22%20allowscriptaccess%3D%22always%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22true%22%20flashvars%3D%22%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%253Fv%253DvWkwet5U6HU%26amp%3Bimage%3D%2Ffiles%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F11%2Faclu_video_thumb_360.jpg%22%3E%3C%2Fembed%3E
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from
Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see You Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy statement on theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here

There is a human cost when gay couples are denied the fundamental right to marry. The stories of three couples from New Mexico demonstrate what thousands of couples in California stand to lose if their right to marry is taken away on Election Day. It is important that we save marriage in California so couples in other states can have the hope to marry, too. Please forward and share this video with everyone you know in California and ask them to vote NO on Prop 8.

Add a comment (22)
Read the Terms of Use

Paschal

Unfortunately, as I'm 14 years old and a citizen of Ireland (Republic of) I'm unable to vote on proposition 8 in California. It's unfortunate that there are people who don't think marriage should be for any two people who are in love whether they're of the same sex or of opposite sexes.

Liberal hater

Sodomy is perverted and against nature. Yeah, what we need is more sodomites destroying the fabric a western civilization. Two men engaging in anal sex is real natural or two women having oral sex. Yeah boy, that is so in line with nature. Hey, lets teach k-5 students about this like B. Hussein Nobama wants to. VOTE YES ON PROP 8

Joe

Gays have the same marriage rights as I do. With me being a man they have the right to marry a woman just like I do.

Normal Person

Gay Marriage is not only unethical, but it opens the door for the continued assault on America's morals.

The Spook

I equate the notion Gay Marriage with that of an abstract artist. I consider an artist to be someone of extrodinary talent like Picaso, Rembrandt, Rockwell, DaVinci, etc. Others will consider any moron who slaps together a toilet bowl with a photo of the Pope at the botom an artist. The notion minimizes art to somthing anyone can do. Marriage is, and has been between a man and a woman as long as man has existed. At no time in history has marriage been anything else. Now, a small percentage of the population want to descecrate the institution by calling any union marriage. If any two or more people want to have a civil union in which they can share benefits, property, etc, great. But calling a union of people of the same sex marriage, is like comparing crap to art. You might as well call apples oranges. They are both fruit, so why can't apples be oranges.

J.Bell

Maybe heterosexuals would be better served by focusing on their own marriages... given the incredible divorce rate, custody battles and children caught in the middle.

NOT F****N INSANE

SUPPORT THE GAYS TO MARRY! MEANS THE FASTER THEY WILL DIE OF AIDS AND WE CAN BE A NORMAL COUNTRY AGAIN!!!! AND MAYBE IT WILL KILL OFF THE PEDOPHILES TOO!! :) WHAT A HAPPY DAY THAT WILL BE!

John Michael

As a Californian I strongly oppose marriage for homosexuals. Marriage has 'always' been for those who can actually breed. Homosexuals should have equal legal rights, but they are not entilted to marriage as they are unable to reproduce or produce children as homosexuals. Homosexuality serves no purpose and adds nothing to the gene pool, so why do homosexuals feel they should be granted the right to marry, since marriage was originally created to protect children and the wives of heterosexual men?

glass house

I'm always confused about the argument of 'man + woman=marriage' - If it is the sanctity of it that everyone fears will be tarnished, then why shouldn't all marriage be regulated? If married, you shall remain married till death as promised and the vegas quick weddings that end the next day will be illegal. If you don't want to legalize gay marriage for reasons of intolerance based on a scapegoat argument of 'crap to art' if you will - then take a long hard look at what you are standing so strongly to defend. The argument fails when the foundation it is built upon has already crumbled.

Anonymous

Marriage is an ancient institution that did nothing but serve to link to people together. Marriage in the religious sense is specifically barred from be interfered with by the Bill of Rights. Marriage in terms of raising a family can be considered a government matter and in these terms, any couple willing to adopt and raise a child would fall into the conditions of marriage while couples who do not have children are not married regardless of sexuality.

Come up with arguments that are not biased and are not hypocritical if you want to argue against gay marriage or else just realize that you all are making irrelevant points and just continue to have your "opinion."

Pages

Sign Up for Breaking News