God Will Protect You From Sexual Temptation...Or Not

God will protect you from sexual temptation. That's what is being taught in Africa, with U.S. federal tax dollars, to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS. But that's not all. In Africa, and other places, government dollars have provided millions of dollars to organizations to teach abstinence-only-until-marriage programs complete with explicitly Christian teachings.

This violation of the separation of church and state is disturbing, but what is more upsetting is the fact that these programs are funded in response to the global HIV/AIDS crisis. Rather than fund truly effective HIV/AIDS prevention programs, the federal government has funded religiously infused abstinence-only-until-marriage programs overseas that indoctrinate youth with Christianity.

We learned about these constitutional violations in the course of our investigation, which began in July 2009, when the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) released a report after auditing USAID's faith-based grantees. The report came to startling conclusions about the misuse of government funds.

For example, the Inspector General noted several instances of biblical references in government-funded curricula, and USAID itself admitted that some of the abstinence-only-until-marriage programs it funds "reflect a religious perspective and include religiously infused materials and religious references." One of the curricula includes an optional Biblical verse for "reflection or memorization," the purpose of which is to show students that "God has a plan for sex and this plan will help you and protect you from harm."

The ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act request to learn more about what was funded by our government. When we received no response to our request, we were forced to file a lawsuit asking a court to order the federal government to release the relevant documents. Over the course of the last year and a half, we've received and reviewed over 16,000 pages of documents that show that our government repeatedly violated the constitutional guarantee of separation of church and state, and wasted our tax dollars on ineffective and harmful abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.

For example, one program tells instructors to use a Bible "as a focal point to indicate that these are prayerful reflection sessions and not simply discussions;" that program participants should follow in Jesus' footsteps; and asks participants to recite Scripture. Another program includes optional Biblical stories and verses; for example, Corinthians 10:13, which says, in part, "And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear."

We recently met with USAID and asked them to stop funding religious abstinence-only-until-marriage programs overseas. They indicated that these programs are coming to a close later this year, and that they will instead focus on innovative strategies for combating HIV/AIDS.

Let's hope this is true, because it is extremely disturbing that young people are learning biblical verses instead of information that could save their lives. Because these programs will continue for the next few months, we sent a letter to USAID last week asking that USAID demand that its grantees stop using religious references in government-funded programs. After our government has spent millions of dollars on these unconstitutional and dangerous programs over several years, it is too little and a little too late. But it would be a good start to what is hopefully a new era.

Learn more about government-funded religion: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (9)
Read the Terms of Use

Teaspoon

Apologies for the metacomment, but I don't see where to submit technical issues. I'm subscribed to the RSS 2.0 feed, and there appears to be an error in the XML file. Anywhere the characters "[space]or" appear in a blog post, they disappear in the feed aggregator. So "to organizations" shows up in my reader as "toganizations." Here at the site, though, it shows normally.

I hope that's enough information for someone to track down whatever might be causing the problem.

Amy

I want people to learn about God but not with condoms being passed out. Not to mention there is discernment that is needed when reading the Holy Bible. No one can understand the Holy Bible without help and to begin teaching the bible during sex ed is ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS.

Anonymous

I'm not pro-religion and I am pro-action that makes sense, but I would posit that Christianity has been a good teaching tool which keeps many many people abstinent until marriage, and that abstinence is one great way of stopping the spread of HIV. Certainly it should be taught secularly, and certainly effective modes of barrier protection (easier to teach, anyway) should be taught as well, but I think motivating people towards abstinence in HIV plagued nations isn't really a bad idea. However, I see a need to separate church and state, even if this might be one of the more potentially effective approaches to stopping the spread of HIV that I've heard of, as well!

Travis L. Bost

Teaching people not to have sex in order to prevent STDs is dangerous? How do you figure?

Doug

No one argues that abstinence is a bad thing. They argue that abstinence only is a bad thing. I have seen these programs in the U.S. as well and they not only teach abstinence, they also try to teach that condoms are not effective protection. Abstinence only education is ineffective and dangerous because of these practices. In any case, teaching fairy tales like those found in the bible as fact on the public dollar is a certain breach of church-state separation. I would say that Christianity is horrible at teaching since they can't seem to stick to facts.

Susan

Travis, the problem is

  • ONLY
  • teaching them abstinence. Many people won't wait. If they don't wait and never learned how to have safer sex... Also, teaching them that a god will not tempt them too much is going to leave them unprepared. Not to even mention the fact that our government is sponsoring specific religious teachings.

    roald

    Amy - I agree completely. Since the money is to help prevent the spread of disease, it should not be spent on teaching religion.

    Anon - I posit that Christianity is a poor teaching tool and fails to keep people abstinent. There are far better methods to teach people how to save their own lives.

    Travis - You don't honestly think that abstinence education actually works?

    Anonymous

    Thank God for the ACLJ!

    Sarah

    There is no constitutional separation of church and state.

    Sign Up for Breaking News