The High Price of Discrimination

We have learned that the Department of Justice will not be seeking an appeal in transgender veteran Diane Schroer’s victory against the Library of Congress. This is, of course, great news. It means that our case against the Library of Congress is final and that the groundbreaking federal court decision ruling that transgender people are protected by Title VII will stand. It shows that the Obama administration had decided to put some muscle behind its promises to help end discrimination against transgender peoples. And it means that Diane won’t have to wait through a lengthy appeal process before getting the $491,190 that is due her from the government for the discrimination she faced by the Library of Congress.

For those who haven’t been following Diane’s case, it’s a perfect example of incredible harm caused by discrimination. After a distinguished 25-year career as an Army Special Forces Officer, Diane retired from the military and applied for a job as a senior terrorism research analyst. As someone who had been hand picked to lead a classified national security operation and had even briefed Vice President Dick Cheney, Diane was especially well qualified for the job. The Library of Congress agreed and offered her the job. Before starting work, Diane asked her future boss out to lunch to explain that she was about to begin transitioning from male to female and would like to start work as a woman. The next day, Diane received a call from her future boss rescinding the offer, telling her she wasn’t a “good fit” for the Library of Congress.

The ACLU brought a lawsuit against the Library of Congress charging sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. After a trial last September, a federal court agreed, issuing a groundbreaking ruling that discriminating against someone who transitions from living as one gender to another is discrimination under federal law. In reaching this decision, the court compared the discrimination faced by Schroer to religious-based discrimination, saying, “Imagine that an employee is fired because she converts from Christianity to Judaism. Imagine too that her employer testified that he harbors no bias toward either Christians or Jews but only ‘converts.’ That would be a clear case of discrimination ‘because of religion.’ No court would take seriously the notion that ‘converts’ are not covered by the statute.” The court also ruled that the library was guilty of sex stereotyping against Schroer because of its view that she failed to live up to traditional notions of what is male or female.

Later the court ruled that Diane is entitled to the maximum damages of $491,190 for back pay, other financial losses and emotional pain and suffering after finding the Library illegally discriminated against Schroer because of her sex. The decision outlining why Diane is entitled to the maximum compensation, the court quotes an affidavit from Schroer:

I am not certain if I can adequately characterize how depressing, demoralizing and temporarily debilitating it is to lose hope. Especially when that hope is founded on something that, in my mind, was completely reasonable, doable, and logical. Doing a meaningful job and putting my qualifications and experience to work, completing my transition and just going on with life — all of these things seemed to me to be reasonable and achievable. When the Library took all that away, my life changed dramatically, because there were no other positive options.

The Department of Justice under the Bush administration vigorously defended the lawsuit, claiming that transgender people are not are not protected by any existing federal laws. Fortunately that era is over and the Obama administration rightly realized that it was time to put an end this litigation. A representative from DOJ has said in the press that its decision not to appeal was based on its assessment of the strength of the factual findings and the legal rulings made in this case, and not whether it would be a good move politically. That is a fine compliment to the ACLU lawyers who litigated the case, especially Sharon McGowan who has championed this case since her first conversation with Diane. But it also shows that the Obama administration really does recognize that discrimination based on gender identity shouldn’t be tolerated.

As far as lawsuits go, this one came out just about as good as we could have hoped. But no amount of money could ever compensate for the harm that is caused by discrimination. And I’m not just talking about the harm to Diane. I’m talking about the harm to all of us. As a man, Diane was considered the best person to help congress help our country fight terrorism. But the qualifications that convinced the Library of Congress to offer Diane the job were tossed aside as soon as it learned she is transgender. Our safety is a pretty hefty price to pay for the government’s discrimination.

Watch a clip about Diane's life and the discrimination she faced at the Library of Congress.

Add a comment (5)
Read the Terms of Use

Dan Canon

The highest congratulations to the ACLU and to Ms. Schroer.

Helen Highwater

The Justice Department's decision not to appeal is, I'd say, is a far more optimistic reflection on the Obama administration than the President's cynical announcement a few weeks ago that a small subset of federal employees would be granted a small subset of job benefits that straight employees have gotten as a matter of course for many years.

roald

Congratulations to the ACLU for helping Ms. Schroer to get her rights as a person and a citizen.

Ms. Schroer, I admire your courage and determination. I wish you the best in the future.

Vietnam Vet

Not to mention the discrimination against pedophiles just trying to express their sexual beliefs !

Jill

I am proud to be big and curvy, and to have accomplished what I have as a mother, as person - as a woman. I too, hope to be an empowering source to women and men, who have suffered at the hand of ignorant people who cannot even let someone do their job. People of all shapes and sizes need to know they are loved and appreciated and deserve to be respected.

Included below are my videos. I will also include my blog, for your review.

YouTube video links:

Part I of III:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOjgUSeYaxI&feature=related

Part II of III:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOjgUSeYaxI
Part III of III:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYUNjaJEubM&feature=related

My blog:
weightyissueswithjill.wordpress.com

I have written my senator (Mel Martinez), along with the CEO of my former employer. I will continue to seek reform for the current discrimination laws to protect employees from degrading, belittling behaviors.

Thank you so much, for continuing to bring awareness to such issues. Slowly, change will come and through tolerance and acceptance, the world will be a better place.

Sign Up for Breaking News