This August, Americans watched in horror as the police descended on peaceful protesters in Ferguson, Missouri, as though they were going into battle. In May, a toddler named Bou Bou Phonesavanh had his chest ripped open and his face torn off by a flashbang grenade that police officers in Georgia threw into his crib during a paramilitary raid. Though these incidents shocked many Americans, police militarization isn't new. The American siege on communities of color has been going on for a very long time.

In a report released earlier this year, the ACLU showed that the militarization of American policing has been fueled in part by federal programs that funnel military equipment and money to local police departments. One such program, known as the "1033 program," allows the Pentagon to send local police departments, free of charge, military weapons such as M-16s and armored personnel carriers like MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles). The Pentagon has sent over $5.1 billion dollars' worth of military equipment to American police departments since this program was created in the 1990s.

Finally, it looks like the federal government might do something about this problem. Yesterday, the Obama administration released a report summarizing its review of the federal programs that fuel police militarization. The report contains several recommendations that might limit the ability of local police to treat American communities like warzones, such as requiring local review of police requests for Pentagon equipment, ensuring better training, and mandating after-action reports for incidents involving local police use of military equipment.

The most important recommendation would limit the kinds of military-grade weaponry that the Pentagon can give away free to police departments nationwide. The report, however, doesn't specify what military equipment should be prohibited. MRAPs and flashbang grenades, at a minimum, would be a good start.

These would all be positive developments, but the administration must also make sure that it takes a deep and hard look at the dangers associated with militarized policing.

The report notes that 96 percent of the equipment the Pentagon gives away to local police is "non-controlled" (like commercial vehicles, office furniture, blankets, and forklifts), and only four percent of 1033 equipment is "controlled" (like assault rifles, armored personnel carriers, and aircraft). These statistics are misleading for two reasons. First, four percent of 1033 equipment turns out to be a pretty big number: There are 460,000 pieces of controlled military equipment currently in the possession of police departments across the country.

Second, to arrive at that calculation, the Obama administration counted each piece of equipment transferred under the program as a single item and gave each item equal weight, instead of taking into account how lethal (or costly) the different kinds of equipment are. For example, it gave one blanket the same weight it gave one MRAP. But these items are not equal—an MRAP is not a blanket.

We should also be realistic about the ability of training to solve the problem of militarized policing. The report correctly notes that many police departments that receive military equipment from the Pentagon are not properly trained to use it. This fact was made glaringly apparent in Ferguson, such as when police snipers trained their rifles on peaceful protesters, and it must be addressed.

But we have to ask ourselves whether training is really the root of the problem here. Police departments across the country continue to aggressively and dangerously police communities of color, sometimes without carrying military equipment. Proper training in the use of military gear won't help as long as the warrior mindset pervades policing and as long as black and brown bodies are seen as "threatening."

Finally, as the report emphasizes, oversight is important—but oversight of what?

Today, most federal oversight of these programs comes in the form of inventory monitoring. History shows that monitoring of 1033 equipment should be improved—a Pentagon spokesperson testified last month that 421 military weapons have gone missing from the program, including M16s and M14s, and that that he "wouldn't be surprised" if local police were selling military Humvees for their own profit. But we need oversight of the use of this equipment as well. If local police are going to receive military weapons at all, the federal government has an obligation to put some reasonable constraints on how they are able to use them.

President Obama has given his administration 120 days to develop an executive order containing concrete reforms. In the meantime, the administration should do what tens of thousands of Americans have already demanded, and place a moratorium on the 1033 program. We cannot risk any more incursions like Ferguson or the maiming of Bou Bou Phonesavanh.

Militarized policing is dangerous, and American communities deserve better.

Learn more about police militarization and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (15)
Read the Terms of Use


It has also revealed a kind of unyielding courage and fortitude for life on the other hand. Thereby, from this senses, it is very evident to expound why so many common people are so crazy for Replica Oakley.If you like to keep up with the trends and wants nothing but the best and the latest, then you'd surely want to get your credit cards on the Split Thump Sunglasses.


This has assured that Ordinary Consumers can also enjoy such extraordinary elements from Replica Oakley sunglasses,The present popularity of Replica Oakley is due to the success of the brand, Oakley. The Hijinx Sport Wrap fits the face comfortably and its Plutonite lenses ensure absolute UV protection for your eyes.


They have a patent logo that is ‘O' on the temples which looks very trendy and is considered a hot fashion statement.It may be argued that you may get any sunglass at a very cheap price from the street vendor then why must you burn a hole in your pocket and buy a branded one.


its people like you who exaggerate the truth to enrage people i know what your doing its called yellow journalism and im wondering is the president paying you to say this or do you actually believe this the baby was fine maybe if you wouldnt believe what you here and go look you would see that.


Tell me why Monrovia, CA in L.A. county with a population of 37,000 owns a MRAP? Has less then 3 Murders in a year. Has the lowest 5% in crime in L.A. county. Police Department like these claim it's for public safety, when the only time they roll it out is at community events begging tax payers to increase their budget. Having people think it deters crime. When a city receive these type of equipment they are required to be used within a year or give it back. This clause makes departments use them on low level warrants to justify ownership. Yes police should be given safety equipment To protect themselves. Vest, helmets well needed. Tanks, flash grenades, grenade launcher is not needed. City are creating swat teams where they are not needed. Just so they can get new toys. This is not the baja cartel safe house they are raiding. It's a 20 year old selling dime bags. Flashbang grenade are not just blinding light. It is a simi control explosion. When Monrovia P.D used one 3 years ago it was heard 5 miles away and blew out windows for 5 houses. The city had to payout lawsuits in the millions and claused them to rethink the use of flash grenades. Officers do overreact the same way a suspect can. I think a good start would be for warrants to limt the tactical weapons used based on evidence. When you show up for shock and awe it doesn't deter violence. It in courageous suspects to adapt and become more aggressive. Making them feel like they have nothing to lose. Shooting and killing anyone untill they turn the gun on themselves.


Stay Informed