Political Beliefs Don't Justify Murder

Dr. George Tiller drove a jeep with armor plating and a bombproof glass and undercarriage to and from work every day. His clinic, where he practiced medicine for decades, was a fortress. His out-of-town patients, many of whom were facing catastrophic pregnancies, could no longer stay at one local hotel because it was targeted by protesters. In early May 2009, someone cut the power to the security cameras and outdoor lights at the clinic and drilled holes in the roof. On May 31, 2009, Tiller was gunned down in the lobby of his church as he handed out flyers before the service. He was wearing his bulletproof vest at the time.

Tiller was killed because he was an abortion provider. The man charged with his murder, Scott P. Roeder, is currently on trial, charged with first degree murder. This week, as the prosecution rests and defense lawyers begin to put on their case, we expect Roeder to try to introduce evidence to prove he is only guilty of voluntary manslaughter. If he succeeds, instead of facing a life sentence he could receive less than 10 years in prison.

In Kansas, where Tiller was murdered and the trial is being held, voluntary manslaughter is known as the "imperfect self-defense." It is available to those defendants who honestly, but mistakenly, believed the circumstances justified the use of deadly force.

But Roeder is not asserting that he misread the circumstances in the lobby of Tiller's church that morning. He is arguing that he is less culpable for Tiller's murder because he honestly believes that the constitution should not protect the right to abortion. Roeder knows that abortion is a constitutionally protected right; he just thinks it shouldn't be. Not only is this a blatant misreading of the law, but the broader implications of the defense should be frightening to anyone who has ever exercised a constitutional right.

On Wednesday, the ACLU asked the court to prohibit Roeder from arguing that his anti-abortion beliefs, no matter how genuine, mean he is less culpable for Tiller's murder. As the Kansas Supreme Court held nearly 20 years ago (in a similar case): "If every person were to act upon his or her personal beliefs in this manner, and we were to sanction the act, the result would be utter chaos."

Doctors who provide abortions deserve the full protection of the law. They devote their lives to ensuring that women can get the health care they need. It is important that we support a woman's ability to make this most private, personal decision. And it is critical that we protect the medical professionals who care for them. Just because Roeder disagrees with legal abortion, doesn't mean he should get away with murder.

(Cross-posted to Daily Kos and Feministing.)

Add a comment (5)
Read the Terms of Use

Steve

If you can show me where the constitution says it is a right to murder your un-born child, I'll never post here again.

Curmudgeon

Could Steve (1/28/10 @ 4:20 pm) please explain what his comment has to do with the recent conviction of Dr. Tiller's murderer?

Anonymous

So a man who spent his life murdering children walked into a bullet?

I guess that's Karma for you. . . . .

$0.02

Or is it so a man tries to discourage murder by committing it?

I guess that's no morals for you.....

Anonymous

If you can show me how it makes sense to be all against killing something - and calling it murder - then go out and murder someone for killing something, I'LL never post here again.
I think people who claim to be against murdering unborn children but don't give a crap in HELL about living children who are starving and being beaten are just completely full of garbage.
Nobody's even the LEAST bit upset that Congress has taken food out of the mouths of children TWICE now but they sure can get up set about the IDEA of killing something that can't even live outside the body.
That's a load of bullshit. If you care about one, you'll care about the other. If you DON'T care about the other, then you DON'T care about the one.

Sign Up for Breaking News