Voters to Personhood: Stick a Fork In It. You’re Done.

This year, voters have overwhelmingly rejected personhood initiatives sending  messages to personhood proponents, as in:  ‘over.’  ‘Finito.’  Not interested. The fat lady has sung and your idea is a loser.

You would have thought the writing was on the wall.  Last November, voters in Mississippi decisively defeated a personhood initiative which, if passed, would have amended the state Constitution to grant legal rights to fertilized eggs, and in the process ban many forms of hormonal contraception and in-vitro fertilization, not to mention all abortions – without exceptions.  Mississippians resoundingly rejected that proposal by a 16- point margin.  And that was in Mississippi, arguably the most conservative state in the nation

Apparently, the message wasn’t clear enough.   Instead of realizing that this extreme proposal would not gain traction anywhere, personhood proponents announced their intention to get proposals on the ballot in not one, but one dozen states this year.  But as in Mississippi, voters weren’t buying what they were selling and they fell well short of their mark.  Voters across the country—in Oklahoma, Ohio, Oregon, Mississippi (again), Montana, Nevada, Arkansas, Florida and California—all declined to sign petitions in large enough numbers to even put the question on their ballots this fall.   And that’s not including the states where politicians tried to pass personhood legislation—that too went nowhere (I’m looking at you Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Iowa, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Washington and Wisconsin).

Up until yesterday, it looked like fetal personhood would only be able to make it on the ballot this year in just one state: Colorado, the home of Personhood USA (the national organization behind these efforts); a state with, let’s be honest, one of the lowest thresholds in the country for petitioning measures onto the ballot.  Out of a population of over 5 million, they needed only 86,105 valid signatures -- or 1.7 percent of the public – to get the initiative on the ballot.  Indeed, Colorado is the only state where personhood proponents have succeeded twice in getting on the ballot in the past-- in 2008 and again in 2010.  Both times, voters rejected fetal personhood by a 2 to 1 margin. This year was different—they couldn’t even find 1.7 percent of the public willing to sign their petition, let alone vote on it.  Two percent of voters think Mitt Romney’s first name is “Mittens” for crying out loud.    If you can’t find 2 percent of voters who agree with you, it’s time to throw in the towel.  Time to pack your bags and go home.  The voters have spoken and they’re not interested. 

Are you listening this time?

Learn more about the war on women: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (3)
Read the Terms of Use

efff offf!

I, for one, will take one for the team... I am the "Slut" Limbaugh and the rest of the 'Tea-Bagger's' are having an aneurysm over [which, btw, is NOT A CRIME...], and though not politically correct, it is not a matter for anyone to concern themselves with; other than myself, my Dr. and/or the other 'contributing' party [...a party whom, seems to be consistently omitted from this debate and THEIR significant role(s); in the HIGH DEMAND for E.C./B.C./Abortion services....hmmmm????] ;)

Don't criminalize E.C/B.C. and/or abortion services....! CRIMINALIZE the equally "irresponsible" MEN who are capable of IMPREGNATING a woman and, clearly, are NOT taking ANY preventative measures of THEIR OWN!! :) [Let alone, any accountability after the fact.] >.<

Here's a 'pro-woman - person hood' bill for someone to draft up... *any man capable of fertilizing a woman's egg can be legally penalized for doing so... 'without obtaining [in advance] the woman's express written consent'.

You could likely erase the entire debate right there...

PUT THE FULL liability for pregnancy on the MAN, if he 'knocks her up' without obtaining her consent... Bill Him, then Book Him! Hahahah!!

Wanna Guess, how easily B.C./E.C./Abortions would be obtained/accessed at the threat of THAT as a consequence !?!

Lois Roberts

Well good a sensible conclusion to a ridiculous initiative.

Joe R

I hadn't heard that statistic about Romney's first name actually being Mittens, but that's certainly a great comparison to make.

Sign Up for Breaking News