Trump Is Poisoning the Census With Bias

On Monday night, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross announced that he will ask about the citizenship of every person in the U.S. in the 2020 census. He is doing this at the request of the Justice Department, against the advice of the Census Bureau’s career professionals, civil rights groups, and communities across the country. He has admitted that adding this question was “controversial.”

The Constitution requires that the federal government conduct a census every 10 years. The Fourteenth Amendment mandates that the decennial census count the “whole number of persons in each State.” Yet adding the citizenship question threatens exactly this goal by intimidating citizens and non-citizens alike from participating in a process which directly affects their lives. This decision is just the latest in the Trump administration’s attacks on immigrant communities and other vulnerable populations. It puts politics over democratic principles and the consequences will be enormous.

Research from the Census Bureau just last year identified how the current political environment may intimidate individuals in already hard-to-count communities from responding to the decennial census. In fact, the research was prompted by a “recent increase in respondents spontaneously expressing concerns to researchers and field staff about confidentiality and data access relating to immigration.” Participants in focus groups specifically talked about Trump’s anti-immigrant policies like the Muslim ban and his ramp up of deportations as reasons they would fear participating in the census. Driving down response rates in certain racial and ethnic groups not only threatens the integrity of census data, it harms those very communities.

The federal government depends on decennial census data to decide how many Congressional representatives each state receives and states rely on this data to draw the districts for their own legislatures. Adding a citizenship question and depressing response rates in already underrepresented communities will allow politicians to draw even more skewed legislative districts. It will also harm federal and state government efforts to accurately distribute funds to communities based on population in everything from Medicaid to school-lunch programs to veterans’ assistance. As Ross is well aware, the census has already struggled to accurately count the numbers of many non-white groups. Inserting this question threatens the progress made over the previous two censuses.

The political decision to add a citizenship question becomes even plainer when looking at the context for the Justice Department’s request. The Department of Commerce was required to submit to Congress the topics of its proposed questions last March in order to ensure the chance to provide input and test the wording of questions. Yet citizenship was not among the topics submitted to Congress and was rushed into consideration because of a late request from John Gore, the acting assistant attorney general in the civil rights division and a Trump political appointee.

Five former directors of the census, serving in both Republican and Democratic administrations, have opposed this decision. The Justice Department argued that citizenship data is critical to the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, yet the decennial census has not included a citizenship question since 1950 (which the exception of New York and Puerto Rico in 1960). In fact, the Justice Department already has citizenship data available to it, which is collected through smaller population surveys that can be adjusted statistically to account for people who don’t respond. The critical difference is that the decennial census is an actual hard count of the population, and if someone doesn’t respond because they are intimidated, they simply go uncounted.

Democracy requires that the census count people in all communities, not just those whom the administration favors.

View comments (42)
Read the Terms of Use


If the U.S. Census can mission-creep to other government functions, couldn't it also mission-creep to inventory all guns in each house? Couldn't it mission-creep to include your income, place of employment or any other private detail?

The only mission of the U.S. Census is to count people in each voting district so there are proportionate represtatives in Congress to represent them. Allowing unconstitutional mission-creep can have unintended consequences.


proportionate represtatives in Congress to represent them? They can't vote - so by definition, they would not be represented.


They are...


Do you really think the Founding Fathers, and others, liberated us from British rule just to have a backdoor later written in to our Constitution that allowed foreigners to gain political control by sneaking in and refusing to leave? The US government is supposed to represent citizens and, to an extent, invited guests. Misusing the 14th Amendment to allow foreigners to obtain political power in the USA is Unconstitutional.

Dr. Timothy Leary

This should not be a problem for any person, they can always lie about their citizenship to the census taker.

Anon in Alaska

That's how Martha Stewart ended up in prison - lying to government employees.

Dr. Timothy Leary

I am glad you mentioned that. I don't think she should have been put in prison. I think she should have exiled to Alaska so you and her could be neighbors.


Trump would be wise to follow the guidelines of the non-partisan ACLU, like some of our greatest presidents and leaders in American history. Eisenhower, Truman and General MacArthur all supported the ACLU by the end of their careers.

Like Trump, these leaders found out that stereotyping and blacklisting unpopular Americans - without constitutional due process - harmed far more innocent people than it protected.

The ACLU - starting with women's voting rights in the 1920's - has always been on the right side of history. Eisenhower, Truman and MacArthur finally learned that fact, Trump should also.


What happens if I just refuse to andwer the citizenship question?


You must be smoking some bad stuff claiming the ACLU is always right.


Stay Informed