The Trump Administration’s Census Cover Up

UPDATE (3/21/2019): On Jan. 15, a federal court blocked the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census, stating that it constitutes an “egregious” violation of federal law. Judge Furman concluded that if the Trump administration got its way and a citizenship question was put on the census, “hundreds of thousands—if not millions—of people will go uncounted.” The Trump administration has appealed the ruling and the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case. The ACLU will appear before the Supreme Court on April 23, 2019. 

Last month, we challenged the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census — essentially a door-to-door federal inquiry of the citizenship status of every member of every household in the country. On Thursday, we received welcome news from a federal judge that the lawsuit can continue. The judge’s decision, in part, was based on an explosive set of documents we obtained from the government. These documents reveal that the Trump administration’s public explanation as to why it needs this information is a sham to conceal its discriminatory, anti-immigrant agenda, and they also prove that a prominent member of President Trump’s cabinet lied under sworn oath to Congress. 

Some background: Every 10 years, the federal government conducts a census to count all people in the United States. Everyone is counted without exception — adults and children, citizens and non-citizens alike. This total population count is used to allocate funding for various federal programs and to apportion representation in Congress, the Electoral College, and within state legislatures. 

Earlier this year, the Trump administration announced that it will include a citizenship question in the census questionnaire being sent to every household in America for the first time in 70 years. The White House persists, despite unanimous opposition from experts warning that such a question will intimidate immigrants and deter participation in the census in communities of color, costing these communities critical resources and political representation. 

Documents uncovered in our case have revealed that attacking immigrant communities is, in fact, the administration’s goal, spearheaded by two of President Trump’s most prominent anti-immigrant ideologues, and that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross lied to Congress in an attempt to cover up this fact.

The Official Story

Here’s the official story, according to the Trump administration, of how a citizenship question came to be added to the census, in three parts.

First, on December 12, 2017, Arthur Gary, a Trump appointee in the Department of Justice, wrote a letter to the acting head of the Census Bureau, Ron Jarmin, requesting that a question on citizenship be included in the 2020 Decennial Census. The ostensible reason was that such information “is critical to the Department’s enforcement of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and its important protections against racial discrimination in voting.”


The Census Bureau is part of the Department of Commerce, which leads to the second step in the story. On March 22, 2018, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross testified before Congress under oath that this December 2017 request was the beginning of the process for considering the inclusion of a question on citizenship in the Decennial Census, stating that “[t]he Department of Justice, as you know, initiated the request.”

Watch Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross Testify before Congress

Third, on March 26, 2018, Secretary Ross issued a memo directing the Census Bureau to include a question on citizenship on the Census. In the memo, he reiterated the story that his decision was a response to the Justice Department’s December 2017 request, emphasizing that the process was initiated “[f]ollowing the receipt of the DOJ request.”

Email From Secretary Wilbur Ross

But that isn’t how things played out in the real world.

The Real Story

The reality, as revealed by documents we’ve obtained through our litigation against the Trump administration, is very different from the official version of events, and it suggests that Secretary Ross deliberately misled Congress about his decision-making process. In fact, discussions of citizenship and the census occurred many months before the December 2017 letter from the Justice Department — and for purposes that have nothing to do with protecting communities of color from voting discrimination.

First, on March 10, 2017 — nine months before the Justice Department request — a member of Secretary Ross’ staff sent him an email forwarding an article critical of the inclusion of undocumented immigrants in the census. In the email, the employee quoted a Census Bureau webpage making clear that “all people (citizens and noncitizens)…are to be included in the apportionment counts.” The staffer noted that “neither the 2000 nor the 2010 Census asked about citizenship.”

Your question on the Census email

Next, about one month later, on April 5, 2017, Secretary Ross’s executive assistant emailed Secretary Ross’s wife to set up a call on behalf of Steve Bannon, who “asked that the Secretary talk to someone about the Census.” The “someone” went unnamed in the email (but stay tuned).

Redacted email

Less than one month after his Bannon-initiated conversation with an unnamed person about the Census, Secretary Ross was already exasperated that a citizenship question had not yet been added to the census. On May 2, 2017, Secretary Ross wrote an email to an aide stating that he was “mystified why nothing have [sic] been done in response to my months old request that we include the citizenship question.” [Emphasis mine]

Redacted email

The aide responded with an email that amounts to a smoking gun. He reassured Ross that they “will get that in place” and explained the plan: They would plant a request with the Justice Department: “We need to work with Justice to get them to request that citizenship be added…” [Emphasis mine]

Consult Email sent to Wilbur Ross

Two months later, Secretary Ross received an email, solving the mystery of whom Steve Bannon sent to talk to Ross about the census. It was none other than the Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who has long pushed an anti-immigrant agenda.

On July 14, 2017, Kobach sent an email to Ross “following up on our telephone discussion from a few months ago… we talked about the fact the US census does not currently ask respondents about their citizenship.”

Email from Kris Kobach

A week later, on July 21, 2017, Kobach forwarded the email to Commerce official Wendy Teramoto, confirming that he and Ross “had spoken briefly on the phone about this issue, at the direction of Steve Bannon, a few months earlier.”

Kris Kobach Email Wendy

Teramoto responded by setting up a meeting between Kobach and Ross for later that week:

Tremoto Email

By August 8, Ross was growing impatient and indicated in an email to an aide that he was prepared to call Attorney General Jeff Sessions directly:

Wilbur Ross Email

The following day, the aide assured Ross that a memo on the citizenship question was coming his way:

Citizenship Memo Email

A month later, the pressure appeared to have paid off. On September 18, a Justice Department aide wrote to Commerce official Wendy Teramoto stating that “we can do whatever you all need us to do…. The AG is eager to assist.” [Emphasis mine] Ross and Sessions then met.

AG Assist

Two months later, DOJ still had not sent an official request, prompting Ross to write to an aide: “We are out of time. Please set up a call with…Justice. We must have this resolved.”

Out of Time

The following month, in December 2017, the Justice Department finally sent its request to the Commerce Department, which supposedly “initiated” the process of considering the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

Together, all of these documents reveal that the fix was in. To recap:

  • In April 2017, Kris Kobach, at the direction of Steven Bannon, pitched the idea of the citizenship question to Ross.
  • In May 2017, Ross was already “mystified” that a citizenship question had not yet been added to the census, and an aide responded by reassuring him that they will “get that in place” as well as explaining the plan to plant the request with the Justice Department: “We need to work with Justice to get them to request that citizenship be added.” [Emphasis mine]
  • In September 2017, the Justice Department assured Commerce “we can do whatever you all need,” leading to a meeting between Sessions and Ross on the issue.

All of this took place months before the Justice Department requested that the Census Bureau add a question on citizenship to the 2020 Census — which appears to be nothing more than a cover-up for the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant agenda. And Secretary Ross appears to have personally participated in that cover-up when he misled Congress by testifying on March 22, 2018, that “[t]he Department of Justice, as you know, initiated the request.” 

But thanks to the documents uncovered through our litigation, Secretary Ross has been forced to admit that the Trump Administration’s official narrative for how citizenship became part of the Census was false. In a June memo, he now admits that he started the process of adding the question “[s]oon after my appointment as Secretary of Commerce,” essentially admitting that he misled Congress.

Supplemental Memo

The Court’s Ruling

In denying the Trump administration’s motion to dismiss our lawsuit Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Jesse Furman pointed to the documents that we obtained, noting that they cast serious doubt on the administration’s version of events. In fact, as Judge Furman found, they suggested that “that the sequence of events was exactly opposite”:

Secretary Ross Email

Based in part on this evidence, Judge Furman concluded that it is plausible that the Trump administration was motivated by discrimination against immigrants of color:

NGO Plaintiffs

Our case will now proceed, with the trial likely in late October or early November — right before the midterm elections.

We’re not tired of winning. See you in court, again, President Trump.

* This case is being brought by the ACLU, NYCLU and the law firm Arnold & Porter, on behalf of the New York Immigration Coalition, Make the Road NY, CASA, and the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.

View comments (81)
Read the Terms of Use


Funny and ironic that you would reference 'lynch mobs' regarding the Trump Administration in your response to an article concerning populations that have suffered intolerable levels of marginalization and discrimination.


You are as delirious as Trump.

Deb Anderson

Bravo, ACLU! Where would we be without you? You and serious journalists are constantly finding the truth that reveals this administration's total lack of integrity, disregard for the truth and the rule of law, and any semblance of shame. It's amazing they persist in trying to float their lies. Are they too stupid to have noticed that you all are always shining the light of truth on their crimes and misdemeanors?


LEAVE that QUESTION blank! it AIN'T rocket science! Some questions just don't DESERVE an answer.


Depends on how they will collect data. Easy enough to discount anyone who leaves that question blank.


At some point, we need to call this what it is, a Corrupt Republication Regime set on causing infighting between Americans focusing on racial/economic issues.

How the GOP got this way, basically by incorporation the Southern Strategy into their bylaws. This makes them very tribal. If they don't all call Hillary Clinton, 'crooked Hillary,' or Robert Mueller the leader of a witch hunt, then they don't feel they are holding-up their place in the structure of the regime.

We need to keep shinning a light on them; pull out your cellphone and turn on the flashlight when you hear a GOPer lying to you. Expose them for their lies. You never know, maybe the Truth will set them free from their tribal mind-set of bigotry and mean-spiritedness.


These people don't even care about what they put in writing. Do they not know that people can get copies of their emails through the FOIA? They are so obvious with their REAL INTENT, anyway. We know they're all racists and apparently, they all are more than willing to freely lie under oath to Congress! Will Mr. Ross be penalized for his lying to Congress? If so, what will his penalty be? Impeachment? Criminal charges? Prosecution? Jail/Prison time? I'm sick of this entire administration. They all need to be locked up! Lock them up! Lock 'em up! Lock 'em up! How many times must I chant it before it happens? Everything Trump has said about others has been projection, and apparently, the Lock her up chant was, too, only in the plural sense. Lock 'em up!


Chances are, they'll just argue they meant to say "wouldn't" when every knows based on the facts they said "would."


I couldn't agree more. How is it possible that this is still going on?


They have nothing to fear when lying to Congress. Even if they were ever charged, Trump will pardon them because they back his corrupt regime.


Stay Informed