What Could Stop Eric Holder from Rolling Back the War on Drugs? A US Attorney Fresh out of "Purple Drank"

Remember two days ago when Attorney General Eric Holder gave a major, televised speech calling out the US for throwing too many people behind bars? Remember how he questioned the War on Drugs and criticized the racial disparities that plague the criminal justice system by directing federal prosecutors to only pursue the worst punishments for the most deserving individuals?

Well, we can see one problem that might get in his way:

How are you fixed for Skittles and Arizona watermelon fruitcocktail (and maybe a bottle of Robitussin, too) in your neighborhood? I am fresh out of "purple drank." So, I may come by for a visit. In a rainstorm. In the middle of the night. In a hoodie. Don't get upset or anything if you see me looking in your window ... kay?

This comment was posted on the personal Facebook account of John Craft, an assistant U.S. Attorney based in Beaumont, Texas.

Of course, John Craft has a constitutional right to post this statement on his personal Facebook wall. And this statement could be dismissed as the racist ramblings of one individual. But the larger concern is whether Mr. Holder will be able to deliver on the promising proposals he made on Monday if federal prosecutors like John Craft allow their troubling personal views to seep into their work.

One of the saddest realities of the U.S. criminal justice system is the existence of enormous racial disparities at every level, from the use of stop-and-frisk tactics by the police to unfair sentencing linked to mandatory minimums. As Mr. Holder himself said on Monday:

We also must confront the reality that – once they're in that system – people of color often face harsher punishments than their peers. One deeply troubling report … indicates that – in recent years – black male offenders have received sentences nearly 20 percent longer than those imposed on white males convicted of similar crimes. This isn't just unacceptable – it is shameful.

It's encouraging and long overdue for the country's top prosecutor to speak plainly about the troubling role race plays in our criminal justice system; no federal Attorney General has done so in decades. But we need to acknowledge that the road to real reform is long and that curbing our mass incarceration crisis is going to require some heavy lifting and major cultural change.

For example, Mr. Holder took issue with the harsh mandatory minimums that are sending people to our already overcrowded prisons for far too long – and all too often for nonviolent drug crimes. He said it's time U.S. Attorneys start taking steps to avoid these mandatory minimums. But here's the kicker: federal prosecutors already have the discretion to do what Mr. Holder is directing them to do. The trick will be getting them to do it. In other words, actually reducing the number of people subject to outdated and overly harsh mandatory minimums is totally dependent on prosecutors following Mr. Holder's lead.

Some certainly will. But when we see troubling comments like John Craft's, we remember that not every federal prosecutor is ready to join the Attorney General in insisting that the criminal justice system avoid the taint of racial bias.

Want to know how to really end mass incarceration? Check out today's New York Times for an op-ed from Vanita Gupta, director of the ACLU Center for Justice.

Learn more about drug law reform and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (4)
Read the Terms of Use


I thought Jolly Ranchers were preferred by consumers of Purple Drank. Even if the kid was using, was death the proper penalty?


FAMM - S. 619: The Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 this is the bill eric holder stole his ideas from it's rand pauls bill he wrote in march truth is you can look up ron paul 1988 morten downey jr show and watch morten threaten to put his cigarette out in his eye and would puke on his face if paul was president as the crowd cheers , why ? Becuase his beliefs against the drug war and the fact they put minorties in jail in uneven numbers - this was the start of something 30 years in the making but holder had to high jack it so you keep thinking pauls are racist - i hope im wrong and this admin is willing to fight and take this issue serious though they never cared the last 5 years in power


Since nothing is served by incarcerating nonviolent offenders, it is unfortunate that 'discretion' alone without imposed guidelines is simply another set up for injustice, unfairness and discrimination. Penalties for offense should be consistent, to degree of offense and application to all offenders. While it is a good thing an official such as AG Holder has spoken out, the issues needed to be addressed go beyond discretion of prosecution and sentencing to include what is an offense and what is just punishment, fairly and equally across the board. That said, I question the AG's executive authority to impose policy, undermine, or transgress in matters and issues up to legislative authority of congress to establish.

Andrew McKenzie

Could Attorney Craft's statement be used by defense lawyers to suggest frivolous racist prosecutorial zeal?

Sign Up for Breaking News