When Anne Frank’s Perspective Isn’t Good Enough For Your Students, It’s Time To Get A New Program

Today, the ACLU Women’s Rights Project issued a preliminary report to the federal Department of Education, detailing the preliminary findings of our Teach Kids, Not Stereotypes campaign. After studying documents from single-sex classes in public schools in 11 states, the report explains that a significant percentage of these schools overwhelmingly base their programs on discredited science rooted in sex stereotypes, and don’t offer parents any reasonable alternative, in violation of the Constitution and Title IX.

The stereotypes in some of these programs were shocking. For instance, one community in Pennsylvania described wanting to give students “male-hood and female-hood defined space” exhibiting the characteristics of “warrior, protector, and provider” for boys, and giving girls “space/time to explore things that young women like [including] writing, applying and doing make-up & hair, art.” Several schools changed their disciplinary rules to allow boys (but not girls) to move around their classrooms, and furnished the boys’ classrooms (but not the girls’) with bean-bag chairs and bouncy balls because one consultant says “boys need to move more than girls.”

These stereotypes have consequences. Last week, the ACLU and ACLU of West Virginia filed a lawsuit against one such school on behalf of a young woman who has been diagnosed with ADHD. She tends to move around a lot, and consistently gets sent to the boys’ classroom as punishment, where she is told to turn her desk to the wall and not participate while the boys go on moving and learning around her. After a year in these sex-stereotyped classes, her grades dropped. Not only is this young woman being deprived of her education, and deprived of a teaching style that might help her, because of her sex, but also, every day she is made to feel that she is an abnormal girl because she doesn’t fit some stereotype of how a girl should learn or behave. This isn’t how education should work.

The mindset of sex-stereotyped instruction can be even more pernicious than that. A recent article about Wake County, North Carolina describes Ian Solomon, the principal of a new young men’s academy there, as saying that his school can “adjust the material to better interest male and female students. For instance, while female students might read The Diary of Anne Frank, Solomon said the male students might read a similar book written from a male perspective.” Does someone really need to explain to this principal why very few diaries survive that were written by Jewish teenagers, male or female, while in hiding from the Nazis? Does he really think this story doesn’t contain enough war, persecution, suspense, or courage to interest boys or girls? And does he really have such a low opinion of boys that he thinks they’re impervious to Anne Frank’s messages of tolerance and hope (and, yes, civil liberties) since they weren’t delivered by a boy or a man?

There is no evidence that sex-stereotyped instruction improves educational outcomes for boys or girls, at any age or in any subject matter. But even aside from the waste of valuable money and effort involved in splitting boys and girls into different classrooms with different rules and topics, these programs come at too high a cost.

One of the strengths of our public schools is the opportunity they provide for students of different sexes, races, religions, and political, cultural, and economic backgrounds to learn from each other. It’s useful in the neighborhood, it’s useful in the workplace, it’s useful in democracy, and it’s useful in the classroom.

Anne Frank said, “I must uphold my ideals, for perhaps the time will come when I shall be able to carry them out.” We’re asking the Department of Education to rescind the 2006 regulations that have been widely misinterpreted as permitting sex-stereotyped single-sex classes like these, or at least to provide guidance to these schools that programs based on stereotypes are illegal. The Constitution enshrines some of our ideals. We hope the Department of Education will carry them out.

Learn more about single-sex education: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Add a comment (10)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

I really appreciate this piece and agree with it. That said, I can't help but notice that it is the girls who really get into The Diary of Ann Frank--I mean, REALLY get into her story--and into that whole genre (if you can call it a genre.) I've seen groups of girls choosing to read book after book set during the Holocaust, while the boys aren't so interested. Which isn't to say that boys shouldn't be compelled to read Ann Frank, and maybe more should be done to make it so that boys don't think it's uncool to do so. The kids I've worked with at the elementary level seem to want to read the same books their friends are reading, except for the super readers, who will read what interests them, friends' opinions notwithstanding.

The Anne Frank ...

Typical of both genders at her age, Anne Frank was quite active, and sometimes manically so. Even while in hiding, and on limited nutrition, she frequently had to be told to move about less and more quietly. Sometimes during air raids, she would purposely run up and down the wooden stairs to burn energy, knowing the bombardment would conceal the noise of her footsteps. At The Anne Frank Center USA we find that, although she wrote with a clear, strong feminine voice, her insights, perspective and words regarding human spirit, tolerance and character development affect both genders equally. While girls tend to identify with certain aspects of her diary and internal dialogue, both genders find her courage inspirational and heroic.

The Anne Frank ...

Typical of both genders at her age, Anne Frank was quite active, and sometimes manically so. Even while in hiding, on limited nutrition, she frequently had to be told to move about less and more quietly. Sometimes during air raids, she would purposely run up and down the wooden stairs to burn energy, knowing the bombardment would conceal the noise of her footsteps. At The Anne Frank Center USA we find that, although she wrote with a clear, strong feminine voice, her insights, perspective and words regarding human spirit, tolerance and character development affect both genders equally. While girls tend to identify with certain aspects of her diary and internal dialogue, both genders find her courage inspirational and heroic.

The Anne Frank ...

Typical of both genders at her age, Anne Frank was quite active, and sometimes manically so. Even while in hiding, on limited diet, she frequently had to be told to move about less and more quietly. Sometimes during air raids, she would purposely run up and down the wooden stairs to burn energy, knowing the bombardment would conceal the noise of her footsteps. At The Anne Frank Center USA we find that, although she wrote with a clear, strong feminine voice, her insights, perspective and words regarding human spirit, tolerance affect both genders equally. While girls tend to identify with certain aspects of her diary and internal dialogue, both genders find her courage inspirational and heroic.

Yvonne Simons, ...

Typical of both genders at her age, Anne Frank was quite active, and sometimes manically so. Even while in hiding, on limited nutrition, she frequently had to be told to move about less and more quietly. Sometimes during air raids, she would purposely run up and down the wooden stairs to burn energy, knowing the bombardment would conceal the clatter of her footsteps. At The Anne Frank Center USA we find that, although she wrote with a clear, strong feminine voice, her insights, perspective and words regarding human spirit, tolerance and character development affect both genders equally. While girls tend to identify with certain aspects of her diary and internal dialogue, both genders find her courage inspirational and heroic. She is a voice of tolerance, and kids get her.

Sally R.

My comments about the systemic anti-male bias in our schools keep being deleted..

Anonymous

Girls are doing much better in our "anti-boy" school systems they get better grades. They follow more-rigorous academic programs.They take more advanced-placement classes. Boys are disciplined more than girls and are medicated for "acting like boys" In every measurable way we are failing our young men.

Anonymous

Seems any comment about the blatant sex discrimination our schools have against boys is not allowed.

You can shout all you want about how cold it is, but some people will argue that ice is too hot anyway. That's what this article is about, hot ice. all the facts point to one inescapable conclusion, the current system is blatantly anti-male and has been for decades., it's preposterous that people still argue about how unfair our system is towards the "privileged class" when all the numbers point the other way. I guess rhetoric is more important than facts.

Anonymous

If it's really a "genre" that girls enjoy more than boys, then having a male narrator wouldn't matter. If boys don't get into the topic (which, to me as an educator, seems a ludicrous idea) then they just don't get into it, male perspective or no. My boys don't tend to like reading about horses as much as many of my girls do. I strongly doubt that they'd suddenly "get into" ponies if a male narrator were telling the story.

Square Peg in R...

The way to deal with discriminatory treatment of boys in school is not to discriminate against girls. The biggest problem is depriving children of a decent education when they don't fit into some arbitrary mold.

Arizona is one of the most backward corrupt states, yet the occasionally do something right. In spite of the opposition I believe the online academy is a very good idea. The only problem with it is that not all the children most likely to benefit from it will have the opportunity. It's only a matter of time before innovative people come up with a way to overcome that hurdle.

Sign Up for Breaking News