The 'Health Care' Bill the House Just Passed Makes Being a Woman a Pre-Existing Condition

On October 7, 2016, when the Hollywood Access tape was released featuring the man who is now our president bragging about grabbing women by the pussy, Donald Trump dismissed it as “locker room banter,” and claimed it was no reflection of how he actually felt about women.

"I have great respect for women. Nobody has more respect for women than I do,” he said following the release. “I've said things that, frankly, you hear these things I said. And I was embarrassed by it. But I have tremendous respect for women. And women have respect for me.”

A great many people gave Trump the benefit of doubt — indeed the majority of white women voted for him. But yesterday, by signing an executive order purported to protect religious liberty and working to revoke part of the Affordable Care Act with Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, the president made it exceedingly clear that his administration does not respect women.

The right to decide when and whether to have a family is fundamental to women’s equality in the workforce and society. Birth control and the right to abortion enable women to plan whether and when to have children, to pursue education and careers. This is how we are empowered to lead full and healthy lives.

We cannot go quietly back to the 1950s.

Yesterday’s executive order on religious exemptions signaled to employers that the government may say that if they object to birth control on religious grounds, they can deny contraceptive coverage as part of the healthcare plans for employees. This, coupled with the House’s repeal of part of the Affordable Care Act, could simultaneously limit women’s access to contraception and abortion, forcing many women into motherhood against their will.

If this sounds like a bad idea, wait, because it gets worse. In addition to taking away access to birth control coverage and potentially forcing women to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term, Trump’s proposed health care bill would then further punish women by allowing insurance companies to deny maternity and newborn care in their insurance plans.

That’s right. Trumpcare, combined with his executive order, could make it okay to deny women contraception coverage, abortion coverage, maternity coverage, and newborn care coverage.

Yes, it sounds like a misogynistic plot from the Handmaid’s Tale. But wait, it gets crueler. It turns out Trumpcare essentially makes being a woman a pre-existing condition.

The bill allows states to waive protections for pre-existing conditions and allow insurers to charge people with pre-existing conditions more for their coverage. These could include pregnancy, C-sections, breast cancer and even treatment for domestic violence and sexual assault. (This is particularly rich, considering this president doesn’t believe grabbing a woman by the genitals is sexual assault.)

And just when you thought the Trump administration had reached the apex of cruelty, there’s more.

Another provision of the new healthcare bill would require new moms to find a job within 60 days of having a baby or lose their health insurance. (The bill makes an exception for mothers if their child has a disability or they’re an only parent or they care for a child under the age of 6.) Sixty days after giving birth, most new mothers are still adjusting, may still need time to recover from childbirth, and may even face health challenges.

We simply can’t allow this to happen. So women, to the millions of you who turned out in pussy hats to protest the day after the inauguration, contact your senators. The House passed the bill, but the Senate can kill it or fix it. So tell your senator to vote against Trumpcare.

We cannot go quietly back to the 1950s.

View comments (87)
Read the Terms of Use


You are a genuinely terrible person and an embarrassment to humanity.


Gender war!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Men! Get arms ready!!!




I think you're being incredibly over-simplistic ... and stupid. And cruel. So at what point should people stop being baby-makers in your limited universe? Is one baby enough? Two? What exactly is selfish about "baby makers"? And should the white woman in the happily married, upper-class suburban household with five kids get more aid and more sympathy than the poverty stricken black woman with five kids in the inner city? Aren't they both baby-makers? So they both should be treated equally, in your POV, and go back to work immediately, right? So now women are supposed to be responsible for their own bodies and for the bodies of others who decided to give their kid up for adoption? So women aren't supposed to have sex, have abortions, give the kid up for adoption, or basically do anything except what the government tells them to do, is that correct? What the hell are you - are you male or female?


Yes, we should support Planned Parenthood! I agree!


What the actual fuck!

Frumpy Rumpy

You are a very sick individual and sadly it was demented morons like you that voted this arrogant clueless narcissist into office.


Poor guy! You desperately need to get laid. It's no wonder you're so bitter about women! Hahaha!!!!


None of these things had ever statistically prevented unwanted pregnancies. The only thing that prevents pregnancies is easy access to birth control. Everytime planned parenthood disappears in a region teenage pregnancy skyrockets. This is fact. Unlike everything you said which is idealism and has never been a reality. You sir are a dolt.

The Vanguard

"What's wrong is my taxes are being used for bullshit like healthcare. "

Don't worry, your taxes are being used to fight foreign wars, my taxes are being used for health care. Hope that clarifies things.

Practice what y...

Since you're so unselfish, go adopt a few children. Lead by example, practice what you preach. Don't go pointing the finger if 3 are pointing back you. It's easy to talk shit, and say whatever the fuck you want but it means shit if you can't back it up.


Stay Informed