New York Passes a Bill to Ensure No One Loses Their Home for Calling the Police

In cities and towns across New York state — and around the country — you can be evicted just for calling for police or emergency assistance. Fortunately, that’s about to change in New York. The State Legislature recently passed a bill — unanimously in the Assembly and 58 to 1 in the Senate — to protect tenants from eviction based on their calls for help.

Cities often enact local laws called nuisance ordinances that label certain properties as “nuisances” based on the amount of 911 calls or emergency responses at that property, regardless of the reason for the call, the tenant’s role in the dispute, or whether the person was requesting medical assistance.

When a property is the site of “too many” 911 responses, the city may punish the property owner with penalties such as fines, revocation of rental permits, or orders of closure. In order to avoid these consequences, landlords often evict or threaten to evict the tenants who called 911, refuse to renew their leases, or tell them to stop calling for help.

The NYCLU and ACLU surveyed New York’s 80 most populous cities, towns, and villages to find out whether they had nuisance ordinances and how they were being enforced. What we learned mirrors what we know about enforcement of these ordinances across the nation: the brunt falls disproportionately on survivors of domestic violence, forcing them to endure threats and violence without police intervention or to risk losing their homes. For example, in both Fulton and Binghamton, domestic violence was the single largest category of activity that led to nuisance ordinance enforcement. These ordinances also hurt those in need of frequent medical attention, including the disabled and the elderly. And they are more commonly enforced in poor communities and communities of color.*

For example, data from Rochester and Troy reveal that nuisance ordinance enforcement happens more often in neighborhoods with higher percentages of residents of color. We also found that enforcement is more frequent in neighborhoods with higher rates of poverty, which makes it even harder for people who are already struggling financially to keep their homes.

Nuisance ordinances harm landlords as well by forcing them into an impossible choice. They can either let tenants who have called for help stay in their homes and risk getting fined or having their property taken away. Or they can kick their tenants out, which violates laws that prohibit evicting people for seeking government assistance.

The lopsided vote count may make it look like this legislation is a no-brainer. But we, along with the Empire State Justice Center and the New York State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, have been working to get this bill passed for a long time.

If Governor Cuomo signs the legislation into law as expected, New York will be the tenth state (plus the District of Columbia) to pass this type of bill. The ACLU wants to make these safeguards the law of the land nationwide. We are calling on the U.S. Senate to address this issue by supporting the housing protections in the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2019, which passed the House in April. These protections would ensure that cities across the country cannot threaten people’s housing because they called for help.

The graphics below represent actual nuisance ordinance enforcement data in the cities of Rochester (left) and Troy (right) from 2012-2018. Each map shows census tracts by proportion of residents of color, with lighter shading representing higher proportions of white residents and darker shading representing higher percentages of residents of color. Circles represent relative numbers of nuisance ordinance enforcement.

Nuisance ordinances: people of color in Rochester, NY

Nuisance ordinances: people of color in Troy, NY

The figures below demonstrate the race and poverty profiles of the census tracts in Rochester where nuisance ordinances are least enforced to evict tenants and where they are most enforced to evict tenants for the period 2012-2018.

LEAST ENFORCEMENT

Race

White

85.4%

Black

8.7%

Hispanic

2.1%

Other

3.8%

Poverty

Median Household Income

$65,819

Below Poverty Line

18.0%

Receiving Food Stamps

3.1%

MOST ENFORCEMENT

Race

White

4.5%

Black

49.2%

Hispanic

42.8%

Other

3.5%

Poverty

Median Household Income

$18,438

Below Poverty Line

37.6%

Receiving Food Stamps

58.6%

*A full disparate impact analysis is not possible due to the limited enforcement data we received.

View comments (3)
Read the Terms of Use

Ms. Gloria Anasyrma

This is good news, you cannot be evicted in New York for calling 911 too many times. Now all you have to still worry about is Donald Trumps real estates business evicting you after buying the property out from under you.

Anonymous

Can you believe that there has to be a law passed for this? How many people have NEVER called 911? Should we get a rebate? It is amazing to me that there is absolutely no common sense in law enforcement. We have to pass laws in order for law enforcement to have common sense?!?! They won't police themselves. Dr. Phil is right - common sense isn't so common, anymore. I'm just hoping to God that with youtube videos showing the truth about how police and law enforcement actually do things that things will improve - I'm not going to hold my breath, though. Having muscles and a squeaked-by high school education doesn't make a good cop, or good "law enforcement." If we made education a requirement I think we'd get a better batch of officers and people in law enforcement. People who could actually THINK.

Anonymous

Why not remove the nuisance ordinance? Or define what could be classified as a nuisance? To have no differentiation makes no sense, and passing this law is even more unfair to landlords! It's basically another tax...

Stay Informed