Wal-Mart Now "Women-Friendly?" We Don't Think So

The New York Times reported yesterday that Wal-Mart is rolling out "women-friendly plans" to buy more from women-owned businesses and to help women who work for Wal-Mart's suppliers. While the company acknowledged that the "majority" of its own employees are women, its plan (as reported in the newspaper) seems to ignore the fundamental disparities in salaries and promotions that were at issue in a nationwide class action lawsuit that the Supreme Court ruled on in June.

According to evidence presented in the lawsuit, women made up more than 80 percent of hourly supervisors, but they held only a third of the store management jobs, and there were fewer women at each step up the management ladder. The plaintiffs also presented evidence that women working at Wal-Mart made five to 15 percent less than similarly situated men with the same seniority and performance. Women were paid $5,000 less than men, even though they had higher average performance ratings in hourly jobs. While the Supreme Court ruled that the case could not go forward as a nationwide class action, many of the individual women are proceeding with their discrimination claims against Wal-Mart.

The lawsuit brought to light evidence, submitted by women workers from around the country, that Wal-Mart operates on a boys' club model, in which women workers are denigrated and managers feel free to make statements like women will "never make as much money as men," or that women could be paid less because they were "working just for the sake of working," while men were supporting a family, and that women's proper role is "in the kitchen," not in the ranks of upper management.

Wal-Mart's new "women-friendly plans" do nothing to address the stereotypes, pay disparities, and gender-based gaps in promotions highlighted by the lawsuit. Wal-Mart should mobilize its corporate structure to stamp out the use of sex stereotyping in hiring and pay decisions and face accountability for existing disparities caused by discrimination.

Learn more about workers' rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (2)
Read the Terms of Use


How nice. A little smokescreen they think will placate "the little women"--as they do nothing to correct their rampant sexist policy.


I work for Wal-Mart I know first hand how they treat people. Every day I struggle to keep my job. Now it is getting wrost since I filled out a report about a female assciate being horassed by a male assciate. They use the open door policy which is a joke let me say and yes they do retaleat against you if they do not like what you say in the open door. Since them I have been acused of stealing time and my work performance not being to their standers. Let me say my work performance have never been in question until after the report I filled out I have been with Wal-Mart since 10-20-2006. During that time I have been made fun of because I have psorisies dryness of the skin. And about my hair and weight when I go to Management they tell me well I did not see it so there is nothing I can do. I have tried for higher positions and have been turn down for every single one. They say it is fair but it is not they interview 3 people but they already know who they are going to put into the position before they give the interview they just use that as a smokescreen so they can put their freinds in the higher positions so how is that fair. I feel like just walking off the job because I am so tired of how they are treating me. I do my job well I try to do my best I stay over when they need me to. I try to do the best I can do when it comes to accuricy. I love my job I just hate how the Management Team treats me and the other assciate. We are people not object to be treat like dirt and pushed aside.

Stay Informed