ACLU of Tennessee Files Lawsuit Challenging State Amendment Banning Marriages for Same-Sex Couples

April 21, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: media@aclu.org

In Rush to Get Amendment on the Ballot, Legislators Failed to Follow Notification Rules Outlined in the State Constitution

NASHVILLE -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee filed a lawsuit today challenging a proposed amendment to the Tennessee Constitution that would ban same-sex couples from being able to marry in the state. The lawsuit charges that the state failed to meet notification requirements as outlined in the state constitution.

"The drafters of our state constitution put in place very specific safeguards to protect the constitution from being amended at the whim of politicians. Unfortunately, in their haste to write discrimination into the law, the sponsors of this amendment are attempting to undermine the democratic principles guaranteed by the Constitution," said Hedy Weinberg, Executive Director of the ACLU of Tennessee. "It is shameful that the politicians who are so eager to prevent gay people from securing the protections of marriage have so little respect for our state constitution that they are willing to ignore these procedural safeguards."

The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of ACLU members, the Tennessee Equality Project (TEP) -- a statewide lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lobbying organization, State Representatives Larry Turner, Beverly Robison Marrero and Tommie Brown, as well as a number of private citizens.

State Representatives Turner, Marrero, and Brown explained their reason for joining in the lawsuit: "When we took office, we swore that we would uphold the Tennessee Constitution. The Tennessee Constitution is what keeps us honest. When we no longer follow the rules, democracy is sacrificed. We are joining in this lawsuit because it's our duty to make sure that when we consider proposals to amend the state constitution, we follow the rules. That didn't happen here."

The lawsuit charges that the text of the amendment was not published six months prior to the General Assembly election as required by the State Constitution under Article XI, Section 3. Before an amendment can be placed on the ballot for a general election, it must first be agreed upon by a majority of both the Senate and House of Representatives. Then the text of the amendment must be published in Tennessee newspapers at least six months before the next election of the General Assembly. When the next General Assembly convenes, a second vote is taken, and the amendment must be approved by two-thirds of the members of both the Senate and House. The amendment is put to the citizens for a vote only if it meets all of these requirements.

According to the complaint filed by the ACLU, the proposed amendment received the necessary votes to pass the first vote in the House on May 6, 2004 and in the Senate on May 19, 2004. However, the Secretary of State failed to publish the text of the amendment until June 20, 2004 - only four months and 12 days prior to the General Assembly elections that took place on November 2, 2004.

"By requiring the state to publish proposed amendments to the constitution six months before the elections, the citizens are given the opportunity to properly debate an issue of such fundamental importance and decide if they want to re-elect the legislators who proposed it or choose to elect someone else instead. Failure to meet the six month publication requirement renders the proposal unconstitutional and invalidates the amending process," said Melody Fowler-Green, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Tennessee.

ACLU of Tennessee, et al. v. Darnell, et al. was filed in the Chancery Court for Davidson County, Tennessee. Attorneys in the case are Melody Fowler-Green and ACLU of Tennessee Cooperating Attorney Abby Rubenfeld of Rubenfeld Law Office.

 

Statistics image