ACLU Plaintiff "John Doe" Ungagged

National Security Letters: ACLU Plaintiff "John Doe" Ungagged

mytubethumb play
%3Ciframe%20thumb%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aclu.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fvideo_thumbnail_1030x580%2Fpublic%2Ffield_image%2Fmerrill_video.jpg%3Fitok%3DOW8NIdmy%22%20class%3D%22media-youtube-player%22%20width%3D%221024%22%20height%3D%22576%22%20title%3D%27National%20Security%20Letters%3A%20ACLU%20Plaintiff%20%22John%20Doe%22%20Ungagged%27%20src%3D%22%2F%2Fwww.youtube-nocookie.com%2Fembed%2FZm3B95gXt0c%3Fwmode%3Dopaque%26amp%3Bmodestbranding%3D1%26amp%3Brel%3D0%26amp%3Bshowinfo%3D0%26amp%3Bcolor%3Dwhite%26autoplay%3D1%26version%3D3%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22%22%20allow%3D%22autoplay%22%3EVideo%20of%20National%20Security%20Letters%3A%20ACLU%20Plaintiff%20%26amp%3Bquot%3BJohn%20Doe%26amp%3Bquot%3B%20Ungagged%3C%2Fiframe%3E
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from youtube-nocookie.com.

In 2004, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the FBI's authority to demand records through National Security Letters (NSL) and to gag NSL recipients from discussing record demands. The suit — the first of its kind — was brought on behalf of a "John Doe" Internet Service Provider that had been served with an NSL and had been prohibited from disclosing — to anyone — that the FBI had demanded records. The lawsuit resulted in numerous court rulings finding parts of the NSL statute unconstitutional. As a result of a settlement agreement in August 2010, the ACLU's "John Doe" client Nicholas Merrill is finally able to publicly identify himself and his former company as the plaintiffs in the case.

Stay Informed