ACLU to Defend Arizona's Medical Marijuana Law

Efforts by Gov. Jan Brewer to Have Law Struck Down Is Attempt to Prevent Sick Arizonans From Accessing Needed Medicine

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

Joe Yuhas, Arizona Medical Marijuana Association, (602) 410-3343; jyuhas@riester.com
PHOENIX – The American Civil Liberties Union today agreed to represent the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association (AzMMA) in order to defend the constitutionality of Arizona’s medical marijuana law.

The move comes on the heels of an announcement today by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer that she has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, a number of potential dispensary applicants under the law and others seeking a ruling from a federal court that the Arizona law is preempted by federal law and should be struck down. A non-profit, membership-based professional association that seeks to advance the interests of Arizona’s medical marijuana profession and the patients it serves, AzMMA is a named defendant in Brewer’s lawsuit.

“By taking the highly unusual step of challenging her own state’s law, Gov. Brewer is undermining the will of Arizona voters and unconscionably seeking to prevent thousands of sick Arizonans from being able to access important medicine,” said Alessandra Soler Meetze, executive director of the ACLU of Arizona. “People should have the freedom to choose the medicine their doctors believe is most effective for them.”

A majority of Arizona voters in 2010 passed Proposition 203, which allows terminally and seriously ill patients in Arizona who find relief from marijuana to use it with a doctor’s recommendation. The law allows marijuana to be distributed by tightly regulated clinics to patients with state-issued registry cards, and creates penalties for false statements and fraudulent cards.

Brewer’s lawsuit charges that Arizona’s medical marijuana law is in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act and that the court should declare the law preempted under federal law. The lawsuit claims that Arizona officials fear federal prosecution for implementing the law, even though U.S. Attorney Burke has stated publicly in recent days that the federal government has “no intention of targeting or going after people who are implementing or who are in compliance with state law.”

Three appellate decisions in California have previously rejected claims that California’s medical marijuana law is preempted by federal law. And earlier this month the Oregon Supreme Court backed away from its previous ruling that a part of Oregon’s medical marijuana law is preempted by federal law.

“Contrary to the governor’s claims, the federal Controlled Substances Act includes an explicit provision permitting states to adopt their own drug laws,” said Scott Michelman, staff attorney with the ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project.

Any delay in the implementation of Proposition 203 could pave the way for the unregulated cultivation and distribution of marijuana. A provision of the law allows patients to grow their own medical marijuana if they reside more than 25 miles from the nearest licensed and regulated dispensary. If dispensaries are not allowed to be established on schedule, thousands of people in Arizona who have received registry cards from the state could be able to grow their own marijuana. Patients would also be able to become registered merely by having a doctor’s recommendation and would no longer have to obtain a registry card from the state.

“Halting a regulated dispensary program would simply provide more business to drug cartels and put patients at risk by forcing them back into the black market,” said Joe Yuhas, a representative of AzMMA. “Failing to implement Proposition 203 would waste taxpayers’ money, thwart the will of the voters and leave a reasonable and regulated medical marijuana program vulnerable to being exploited.”