CATO Backs Romero's Real ID Rebuttal

NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union celebrates the legacy of Dolores Huerta, who passed away today at the age of 96. Huerta was one of the most influential workers’ rights leaders of the 20th century. Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director, had the following reaction to today’s news: “Dolores Huerta spent her life challenging injustice in every form – fighting for workers’ rights, women’s rights, immigrants’ rights, and so much more. Her bravery, perseverance, and compassion changed this country for the better. “As co-founder of the United Farm Workers Union, she successfully organized farmworker walkouts and consumer boycotts to demand better working conditions for Latino farmworkers. Today, millions of workers enjoy the protections that Ms. Huerta, and thousands of others who marched and mobilized alongside her, fought so hard to win. “The ACLU was proud to honor Ms. Huerta with the ACLU’s Roger N. Baldwin Medal of Liberty in 1993, recognizing her lifetime contributions to civil rights and civil liberties. More than three decades later, her continued legacy of standing up to injustice has stood the test of time. History will remember Dolores Huerta as a modern-day trailblazer for our rights and freedoms, and the ACLU will continue the fight to protect the justice and freedoms she spent her life working to achieve.”

In 2013, Michigan passed the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission Act (MIDCA) to ensure that indigent criminal defendants—that is, those who cannot afford to pay for counsel themselves—received constitutionally adequate counsel, paid for by the state. This case concerns whether and under what circumstances trial courts can, consistent with MIDCA, order indigent criminal defendants to pay the state back for their attorneys. The ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative, the ACLU of Michigan, and the Michigan State Planning Body filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that MIDCA, properly construed, partially abrogated a different statute authorizing trial courts to assess attorney fees against indigent defendants and explaining that allowing such orders would undermine Michiganders’ right to counsel.

ATLANTA – The ACLU of Georgia and the ACLU Voter Education Fund are spending $250,000 in select Georgia House races to inform voters that their civil rights and liberties, including voting rights and abortion, are on the ballot this November. The ACLU Voter Education Fund will send over 225,000 mail pieces to educate voters about candidates in State House Districts 48, 53, and 105. These state races include communities like Lawrenceville, Peachtree Corners, and Sandy Springs and are highly contested. The ACLU Voter Education Fund is investing in these races because the elected candidates will influence civil rights and liberties statewide for at least two years. Their decisions will affect voting rights, reproductive rights, privacy, and other fundamental liberties. On the voter guides, residents will see candidates’ responses to questions about those issues, such as whether they would vote to repeal Georgia’s six-week abortion ban or whether they will work to prevent unnecessary restrictions on early and absentee voting. “Georgia voters have a right to know the positions that the candidates take on the rights and freedoms that shape their lives,” said Christopher Bruce, deputy executive director, ACLU of Georgia. “We’re making sure voters get the information they need to understand the issues in these elections and what the candidates would do if they had the power of the Georgia House. From reproductive freedom and voting rights to safeguarding privacy and other liberties, the choices made under the Gold Dome can have a lasting impact on our communities.” While the ACLU Voter Education Fund does not endorse or oppose any candidates, the six-figure campaign will educate voters about the candidates’ positions on key civil rights issues, including abortion, birth control, marriage equality, and voting rights for Indigenous communities, through direct mail, radio ads, and digital ads.

When a court rules that an issue is a “political question,” that issue becomes “nonjusticiable.” In other words, courts close their doors to political questions, even when an injured plaintiff seeks relief that a court could provide. The ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative and the ACLU of Minnesota filed an amicus brief in the Minnesota Supreme Court arguing that the Court should narrow, or at a minimum, not expand, the political question doctrine under the Minnesota Constitution. The brief urges the Court to preserve the justiciability of legal issues and thus ensure that provisions of the state Constitution are not just words on paper but meaningful guarantees for the people of Minnesota.