At the Polls: Will the Fate of the USPS Affect Voter Access?

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Tennessee filed a federal lawsuit today challenging Tennessee’s discriminatory new congressional redistricting map. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of three individual Memphis voters, as well as the Black Clergy Collaborative of Memphis, the Memphis A. Philip Randolph Institute, and the Equity Alliance, who are seeking to block the map from taking effect before the August primary election. Tennessee has had a Memphis-based congressional district for the better part of a century. The challenged map dismantles that district, which is the state’s only majority-Black congressional district. It divides Black voters in Memphis and Shelby County across three majority-white districts that stretch from Memphis hundreds of miles into central Tennessee, diluting Black Memphians’ votes and stripping those communities of any meaningful voice in Congress. “Black voters in Memphis did exactly what the Constitution empowers every American to do, which is to choose their representative,” said ACLU of Tennessee Executive Director Miriam R. Nemeth. “The legislature’s response was an effort to ensure that those votes never carry the same weight again. The law has a name for this, and it’s not redistricting, it is textbook First Amendment retaliation. And it is, at its heart, racism.” A white-controlled supermajority of the Tennessee General Assembly enacted the new map targeting Black Memphians over mere days in a special legislative session that had been called after the candidate-qualifying deadline had already run. The process for drawing and enacting the maps was unprecedented and suspect. Mid-decade congressional redistricting has been illegal under state law for over 50 years. The General Assembly has never engaged in mid-decade congressional redistricting in its modern history, let alone done so at warp speed, with no public debate, and in May of an election year. The map’s white sponsors never disclosed basic facts about the map, like who drew it, or what data was used. “Every American schoolchild learns that, not so long ago, white-controlled governments in some states exercised total power to discriminate, punish, and shut Black citizens out of power. Schoolchildren also learn that we overcame that injustice, through great struggle and sacrifice, and that our deepest-held constitutional values triumphed in the end. But today, again, a white-dominated faction is viciously stripping hard-won power from Black Tennesseans,” said Ari J. Savitzky, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “We seek to enforce the Constitution’s fundamental guarantees in the face of this all-too-familiar injustice. We ask the courts to strike these maps down.” The recent Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, stripping a critical federal protection against decades of discriminatory voting systems. It opened the door for states to try to enact discriminatory maps. The complaint asserts that the Tennessee map violates the U.S. Constitution on two grounds: Intentional racial discrimination against Black voters in Memphis. First Amendment retaliation against Black voters in Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District for exercising their right to political expression and association. The lawsuit asks the court to declare the new map unconstitutional and to restore the prior congressional district lines before any primary election proceeds under the new boundaries. The complaint is here.

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County today issued an order ruling that Senate Bill 490, which passed during the 2025 Montana legislative session, is enjoined and may not go into effect. As a result, voters will not lose eight critical hours of voter registration on Election Day. “This ruling is particularly important to rural Tribal communities across Montana,” said Jacqueline De Leon, senior staff attorney at NARF, “many of whom rely on the ability to register and cast a ballot on Election Day. Being able to register on Election Day is critical to ensuring full Indigenous participation in Montana’s electoral process.” “The State of Montana could not provide a compelling government interest justifying this voter suppression law because there simply isn’t one,” said Alex Rate, deputy director/legal director at ACLU of Montana. “Election Day voter registration is secure, it’s fair, and — with this ruling — it continues to be protected in Montana.” “Democracy works best when every eligible voter can participate freely,” said Theresa J. Lee, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “Attempts to restrict access to Election Day registration disproportionately burden Native communities and undermine the promise of equal access to the ballot. This decision is a powerful reminder that the right to vote is not a privilege — it is a constitutional guarantee that belongs to all of us.” This suit was brought by the ACLU of Montana, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Native American Rights Fund (NARF). Click here to learn more. Additional plaintiff parties are represented by Graybill Law Firm, Elias Law Group, and Upper Seven Law.

BATON ROUGE, La. — A group of individual voters, the League of Women Voters of Louisiana, and the League of Women Voters of Louisiana Education Fund today filed an emergency lawsuit in federal court seeking to block Secretary of State Nancy Landry’s implementation of Gov. Jeff Landry’s unlawful executive order that attempts to suspend Louisiana’s congressional House primary elections after voting had already begun. Secretary Landry’s action seeks to discard Louisiana’s congressional map in a manner that disenfranchises tens of thousands of Louisiana voters who have already voted. Plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Louisiana, Legal Defense Fund, and the Harvard Law School Race and Law Clinic. Plaintiffs and counsel released the following joint statement: “This illegal executive order threatens the integrity of our democratic system and disregards the voices of voters who have already participated in the May primary election in good faith. By attempting to suspend an ongoing election, state officials are creating confusion, undermining public trust, and placing partisan interests above the constitutional rights of Louisiana voters. Black voters and communities that have long fought for equal political representation should not be forced to bear the burden of unlawful power grabs designed to silence their voices. Elections belong to the people — not to politicians seeking to manipulate the rules.” The executive order follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which eviscerated federal protections for voters of color and struck down Louisiana’s congressional map that had provided Black voters a meaningful opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. The complaint is here.