What Happens In Tennessee Won't Stay in Tennessee
April 13, 2023
On Friday, April 7, the Tennessee state legislature voted to expel two out of the three state representatives, Reps. Justin Pearson and Justin Jones, who protested on the chamber floor in the wake of a mass shooting that killed six people, including three 9-year-old children. Their expulsion was an unprecedented move, completely disregarding the norms of democracy and the will of voters. No Tennessee House member has ever been removed from elected office for simply violating decorum rules.
This week, Reps. Pearson and Jones were both reinstated to their elected seats in the State House, but the damage has been done.
Here to unpack all that has happened in Tennessee this week is Jeff Preptit, a staff attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee.
In this episode
Kendall Ciesemier
This Episode Covers the Following Issues
Related Content
-
UtahApr 2026
Voting Rights
United States V. Henderson. Explore Case.United States v. Henderson
On behalf of the League of Women Voters of Utah, the ACLU Voting Rights Project and the ACLU of Utah have filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit over the federal government’s demand for Utah’s voter registration file. The Department of Justice is demanding the entire state list, including voters’ sensitive personal data, such as drivers’ license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.Status: Ongoing -
West VirginiaApr 2026
Voting Rights
United States V. Warner. Explore Case.United States v. Warner
The United States has sued West Virginia, seeking access to the State's complete voter registration file, including fields that are not publicly available. The West Virginia Citizen Action Group (CAG), a non profit organization representing voters across the State, has moved to intervene. Represented by the ACLU, ACLU of West Virginia, the Campaign Legal Center, and the Brennan Center for Justice, CAG argues that its members' personal data and ability to participate in elections are directly at risk.Status: Ongoing -
Press ReleaseApr 2026
Voting Rights
Voting Rights Groups Challenge Executive Order On Mail-in Ballots As Illegal Interference In Elections. Explore Press Release.Voting Rights Groups Challenge Executive Order on Mail-In Ballots as Illegal Interference in Elections
Boston, MA – A coalition of voting rights organizations filed a lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts challenging President Trump's March 31 executive order concerning mail-in voting. The Constitution explicitly states that only Congress and the states can set the rules for elections. Nevertheless, the order attempts to displace states’ mail-in voting laws by transforming the U.S. Postal Service from a neutral mail carrier to an arbiter of who may cast a ballot by mail. The order also requires the Department of Homeland Security to build and give to each state a list of citizens eligible to vote. Given that federal databases are out-of-date and unreliable, this risks mass disenfranchisement of eligible voters. The suit was filed by the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, the League of Women Voters, Association of Americans Resident Overseas (AARO), U.S. Vote Foundation, OCA - Asian Pacific American Advocates (OCA), and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. They are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), ACLU of Massachusetts, Brennan Center for Justice, Legal Defense Fund (LDF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), and LatinoJustice PRLDEF. The plaintiffs and their counsel released the following statement: "This executive order is an illegal and dangerous attempt by the Trump administration to eliminate accessible voting options and subvert our democracy by seizing control of election administration from the states and Congress. If implemented, it would disenfranchise eligible voters across the nation. “Attempts to end voting by mail are part of the Trump administration’s larger strategy to undermine elections and subvert the will of the people. The U.S. Constitution is clear: the states and Congress — not the president — set the rules for our elections. President Trump tried to make an end-run around the Constitution with another executive order last year and was promptly rebuffed by multiple courts. History will repeat itself. “This executive order would upend countless state laws and procedures regarding mail-in voting. It could deny eligible voters, including voters with disabilities, U.S. citizens living abroad, and military members and their family members, the right to vote by mail — and unknown numbers will be disenfranchised without that option. Far from improving elections, this executive order would create chaos for election officials, erode public confidence in our elections, and block Americans from exercising their most fundamental right and responsibility as citizens — voting. By taking the administration to court, we are standing up for the rule of law and the promise of our democracy.” A copy of the lawsuit can be found online here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2026/04/LWV-v-Trump.pdfCourt Case: League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. TrumpAffiliate: Massachusetts -
MassachusettsApr 2026
Voting Rights
League Of Women Voters Of Massachusetts V. Trump. Explore Case.League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump
On March 31, 2026, President Trump issued a sweeping Executive Order titled "Ensuring Citizen Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections," seeking once again to seize control of election administration from Congress and the states. The Order directs federal agencies to compile lists of U.S. citizens and transmit them to states before every election, directs the U.S. Postal Service -- an independent agency established by Congress -- to create a list of "approved" mail voters, and instructs USPS to refuse to deliver ballots from voters not on that federally created list. If implemented, the Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible citizens to cast their ballots, particularly military members, overseas citizens, the elderly, recently naturalized citizens, and voters with disabilities who rely on mail voting.Status: Ongoing