ACLU Comment on Raids of Central American Families in United States

CONCORD, N.H. — Legal groups that recently won a major Supreme Court victory on behalf of babies who would have been denied citizenship under a failed Trump executive order are asking a court to ensure those children remain protected from the president’s latest attacks. The Supreme Court handed the civil rights organizations a resounding win on June 30 in Trump v. Barbara, when it struck down the president’s order that sought to undo this fundamental constitutional protection. Last week, the president signed a new executive order again targeting birthright citizenship. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and Democracy Defenders Fund successfully argued the Barbara case. Today, they asked a federal court to make it unquestionably clear that the citizenship of babies covered by that class-action lawsuit is protected despite this new executive order. In its June ruling, the Supreme Court confirmed that the Constitution’s Citizenship Clause puts “the question of citizenship ‘once and forever [to] rest.’” In their motion filed today in New Hampshire federal court, where the lawsuit was first filed, the legal groups wrote: “The Supreme Court confirmed that there are no additional exceptions beyond those recognized in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and the Fourteenth Amendment is not subject to executive (or legislative) revision. President Trump’s continued resistance to that principle calls for this Court’s renewed intervention.” The following is comment on today’s filing: “President Trump may not like the fact that birthright citizenship is a constitutional right, and he may not like that he lost in the Supreme Court, but that is really beside the point,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and lead counsel. “It’s well past time for these illegal and cruel attacks on children’s citizenship to end.” “The Supreme Court could not have been more clear: President Trump’s attempt to redefine who is an American citizen through executive action was unconstitutional,” said Amia Trigg, deputy director of litigation at the Legal Defense Fund. “Now, the president is trying to double down on his illegal attack on this constitutional protection. We will not stand idly by as the executive branch blatantly ignores the court's authority in its crusade against American children.” “This order is a desperate and brazen attempt to bypass the Supreme Court’s decision and expand a very narrow set of exceptions to the 14th Amendment. As the court has already affirmed, it’s the Constitution, not the president, who determines who is American and who gets a say in our democracy. Americans are struggling to put food on the table and pay their bills, and this administration is just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks,” said Aarti Kohli, executive director of the Asian Law Caucus. “Immigrant communities know that our rights are on the line, especially when the government uses us as scapegoats. The Trump administration already lost once and it will lose again.” “President Trump’s latest attempt to chip away at birthright citizenship is as constitutionally futile as it is cruel,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of Democracy Defenders Fund. “We’ve seen this strategy from this administration before, and the courts have repeatedly made it clear that the 14th Amendment cannot be rewritten by executive fiat. We are filing this motion to ensure that the protections currently shielding our clients remain intact — we will not let the administration use babies as pawns in a political stunt like this.” SangYeob Kim, director of the ACLU-NH Immigrants’ Rights Project, said, “Birthright citizenship is the law of the land — period. Cruel attacks on this core constitutional right must not be allowed to stand.” “The Supreme Court reaffirmed the plain language of the Constitution in June, making it clear that neither the president nor Congress can end birthright citizenship,” said ACLU of Maine Executive Director Molly Curren Rowles. “We’ll continue defending the Constitution and the core principles reflected in the 14th Amendment: that with few exceptions, every baby born on U.S. soil is a U.S. citizen.” “Trump's executive orders are a ham-handed attempt to distract the American people from the Supreme Court’s clear holding: that birthright citizenship is protected by our Constitution,” said Carol Rose, executive director at the ACLU of Massachusetts. “We'll stay in court for as long as it takes to secure peace of mind for our clients and ensure that babies born on U.S. soil have their rights as guaranteed under U.S. law.” Read the motion here: https://www.aclu.org/cases/barbara-v-donald-j-trump?document=Motion-to-Clarify-PI#legal-documents

NEW YORK — The American Civil Liberties Union today condemned President Trump’s latest attacks on birthright citizenship with his new executive orders. The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a stinging loss just a few weeks ago when it struck down the president’s previous order that sought to undo this fundamental constitutional protection. The ACLU successfully argued that case, Trump v. Barbara. “The Supreme Court already decided this issue: Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution. No additional executive order can change the meaning of the Constitution. Any executive order that tries to rewrite birthright citizenship will meet the same fate as the last one,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.  

The claimants detail being unlawfully detained, denied medical care, or targeted simply for speaking out or recording what they saw. Their experiences reveal a dangerous pattern of abuse that threatens the rights and safety of us all.

NEW YORK — Two more federal appeals courts this week rejected the Trump administration’s new policy subjecting millions of immigrants to mandatory detention without access to bond hearings. Both the Ninth Circuit and Seventh Circuit issued July 30 decisions in American Civil Liberties Union lawsuits. Read the Ninth Circuit ruling here. Read the Seventh Circuit ruling here. The rulings reflect similar decisions from four other federal appeals courts, as well as those issued by hundreds of district court judges who have found the policy unlawful. For decades, immigrants in removal proceedings who were detained by the government have generally had the right to seek release through a bond hearing before an immigration judge. In mid-2025, the Trump administration suddenly adopted a new radical reinterpretation of the immigration laws and declared that anyone who entered without inspection must be detained without access to bond. Among those who were affected were people who came as children and are eligible for legal status, even those with long-pending immigration applications who have been waiting years due to administrative backlogs. “The courts have repeatedly ruled against the Trump administration’s radical reinterpretation of our country’s detention laws,” said My Khanh Ngo, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, who argued the Seventh Circuit appeal. “The law is clear: The administration can’t cruelly lock up people this way without giving them the basic due process of a bond hearing. Period.”