ACLU Condemns Divided Eighth Circuit Ruling in Fremont Immigration Case
Attorneys Call the Ruling “Out of Step” With Other Federal Courts and the Rest of the Country
June 28, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
LINCOLN, Neb. – On Friday, June 28, a divided panel of the Eighth Circuit issued a decision in a case brought by the ACLU, upholding a 2010 Fremont City Ordinance that opponents argued was an unfair and discriminatory effort to prevent persons thought to be undocumented immigrants from renting homes in the 25,000-person town of Fremont. The three-judge panel issued three separate opinions, including a strong dissenting opinion by Judge Myron Bright.
Statement from Jennifer Chang Newell, Attorney for the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project
The court majority failed to recognize that Fremont’s attempt to exclude undocumented immigrants from the City’s borders is not only un-American, it’s unconstitutional. Judge Bright got it right when he said that the Ordinance violates our Constitution because it “seeks to make life so difficult for undocumented persons that they are forced to retreat.” While the rest of the country moves forward to reform our immigration system to recognize the contributions of these hard-working immigrants, Fremont is taking us backwards with a policy of discrimination and exclusion.
Statement from Amy Miller, Legal Director for ACLU of Nebraska
The court today stepped far afield from the other federal decisions on similar issues. We will begin to talk with our clients and evaluate our options moving forward. Judge Bright’s dissent makes clear what the real impact of this ordinance will be on the people of Fremont: a climate of fear, of exclusion and distrust. These are not Nebraska values. It is a sad day for those who trust in Nebraska’s motto of “equality before the law.”
Attorneys on the case, Martinez v. Fremont, include Newell and Esha Bhandari of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project; Miller of ACLU of Nebraska; Nebraska trial counsel Alan Peterson of Lincoln; and Terry Wittler and Michelle Sitorius of Cline Williams.
Attorneys Call the Ruling “Out of Step” With Other Federal Courts and the Rest of the Country
June 28, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
LINCOLN, Neb. – On Friday, June 28, a divided panel of the Eighth Circuit issued a decision in a case brought by the ACLU, upholding a 2010 Fremont City Ordinance that opponents argued was an unfair and discriminatory effort to prevent persons thought to be undocumented immigrants from renting homes in the 25,000-person town of Fremont. The three-judge panel issued three separate opinions, including a strong dissenting opinion by Judge Myron Bright.
Statement from Jennifer Chang Newell, Attorney for the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project
The court majority failed to recognize that Fremont’s attempt to exclude undocumented immigrants from the City’s borders is not only un-American, it’s unconstitutional. Judge Bright got it right when he said that the Ordinance violates our Constitution because it “seeks to make life so difficult for undocumented persons that they are forced to retreat.” While the rest of the country moves forward to reform our immigration system to recognize the contributions of these hard-working immigrants, Fremont is taking us backwards with a policy of discrimination and exclusion.
Statement from Amy Miller, Legal Director for ACLU of Nebraska
The court today stepped far afield from the other federal decisions on similar issues. We will begin to talk with our clients and evaluate our options moving forward. Judge Bright’s dissent makes clear what the real impact of this ordinance will be on the people of Fremont: a climate of fear, of exclusion and distrust. These are not Nebraska values. It is a sad day for those who trust in Nebraska’s motto of “equality before the law.”
Attorneys on the case, Martinez v. Fremont, include Newell and Esha Bhandari of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project; Miller of ACLU of Nebraska; Nebraska trial counsel Alan Peterson of Lincoln; and Terry Wittler and Michelle Sitorius of Cline Williams.
Stay Informed
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy policy.
The Latest in Immigrants' Rights
-
Broken Promises: Trump-era Travel Bans Keep Thousands Trapped in Limbo
-
Immigrants’ Rights Organizations Reach Settlement in Case Brought to Protect Medically Vulnerable People Detained by ICE
-
Voting and Immigrants’ Rights Advocates Sue Over New Florida Law That Targets Voter Registration, Civic Engagement, and Political Speech
-
Shen v. Simpson
ACLU's Vision
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About Immigrants' Rights
The fundamental constitutional protections of due process and equal protection embodied in our Constitution and Bill of Rights apply to every person, regardless of immigration status.