ACLU Defends Blogger's Right to Parody "Ex-Gay" Group

March 22, 2006 12:00 am

Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States


SAN FRANCISCO — Citing First Amendment protection for parodies, the American Civil Liberties Union today came to the defense of a California man who received a cease-and-desist letter after posting a parody of a billboard advertisementfor so-called “reparative therapy” on his website.

“The moment I saw the billboards last September, I was deeply offended. The inspiration for the parody I created came to me instantly. How would straight people feel if their very being, their sense of self was being so overtly disparaged?” said Justin Watt, a blogger from Santa Rosa, California. “Their response was to try to intimidate me into taking the image down. It’s troubling that an organization as big as Exodus would go to such great lengths to silence its critics.”

The billboard, sponsored by “ex-gay” ministry Exodus International, read, “Gay? Unhappy?” After seeing a photo of the billboards online, Watt posted an altered version reading, “Straight? Unhappy?” on his website, Liberty Counsel, an anti-gay legal group representing Exodus, sent Watt a cease-and-desist letter earlier this month claiming the parody violated Exodus’s intellectual property rights and threatening legal action if the parodies were not removed. In a response sent today to Liberty Counsel, the ACLU’s cooperating attorney, Laurence Pulgram of Fenwick & West, LLP, called upon Exodus to drop its attempts to censor Watt, pointing to case law holding parodies to be Constitutionally protected speech.

“Parodies like Justin’s are protected by the First Amendment as a form of political commentary. His point was to make a comment on a very important issue he has strongly held beliefs about: that Exodus’s tactics are wrong, that there’s nothing wrong with being gay, and that being gay doesn’t make you unhappy,” said Ann Brick, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California. “Just as a group like Exodus has a Constitutionally protected right to say whatever it wants to about gay people, even when that view has been roundly condemned by every major psychological and medical organization, Justin has a right to use parody to voice his opposition.”

The American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Medical Association and other mainstream mental health and medical groups have denounced reparative therapy, stating that there is no evidence that reparative therapy is successful and that the practice may in fact be harmful to those who undergo it.

“Justin’s use of Exodus’s own image to criticize its message is exactly the sort of speech the Constitution protects,” said Pulgram, who heads the copyright litigation group at Fenwick & West. “The law protects people like Justin from groups like Exodus that try to use copyright as a method of bullying their critics into abandoning their First Amendment right to express their opinions through parody.”

Watt is represented by Brick, Pulgram, and Tamara Lange of the ACLU’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Project.

Additional information about the case, including an image of Watt’s billboard parody, the ACLU letter responding to Liberty Counsel’s cease and desist letter, and statements from mainstream mental health and medical organizations about reparative therapy, is available at

Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.

Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release