Federal Appeals Court Reverses Dismissal of Candidate’s Lawsuit
Three-judge panel says Marion County Election Board’s attempt to enforce unconstitutional statute “shaves very close to harassment or bad faith prosecution.”
March 20, 2014
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, firstname.lastname@example.org
Indianapolis — In 2003 the Marion County Election Board conceded in a federal lawsuit that Indiana’s anti-slating statute violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Still, during the 2012 primary season, the Board enforced the statute against candidate Zachary Mulholland, leading to a lawsuit in federal court.
The statute, Indiana Code § 3-14-1-2(a)(2) and (3),made it a crime for a candidate in a primary election to publish certain election materials linking him with other candidates without prior permission and notice to the county election board. In 2003 the federal court found the statute violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution in all respects. In October 2012, Mulholland, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, challenged the election board’s continued enforcement of the statute in a lawsuit filed in federal district court.
Today, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s dismissal of the case. In doing so, the appellate court noted that the Board’s attempt to continue to enforce a statute that it had admitted was unconstitutional “shaves very close to harassment or bad faith prosecution.” The Court further stated that if the Board attempted to enforce the statute again in upcoming primaries against any candidate the Board would likely be liable for damages for its actions.
“Although the case is not over, this is a major victory not just for Mr. Mulholland, but for the First Amendment,” said ACLU of Indiana Legal Director, Kenneth J. Falk who represents Mr. Mulholland along with ACLU attorney Gavin M. Rose.
The decision, Zachary Mulholland v. Marion County Election Board, Cause No.13-3027, was issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on March 20, 2014.
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
The Latest in National Security
ACLU Acknowledges Improvements to DOJ Racial Profiling Policy, But Says Far More is Needed
ACLU Applauds Court For Allowing Case Challenging FBI’s Wrongful Prosecution of Chinese American Physics Professor To Move Forward
Shen v. Simpson
Chinese Immigrants Sue Florida Over Unconstitutional and Discriminatory Law Banning Them From Buying Land
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About National Security
The ACLU’s National Security Project is dedicated to ensuring that U.S. national security policies and practices are consistent with the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights.