Free Speech, LGBT Equality, Police Interaction Among Topics at ACLU-TN Students’ Rights Conference
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666;media@aclu.org
NASHVILLE -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee’s annual Students’ Rights Conference, “Stand Up/Speak Up,” will take place on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 in Nashville. This free conference, open to all public and private high school students, will focus on young people’s civil liberties and civil rights, both in school and in the community.
“ACLU-TN’s students’ rights conference is designed to educate young people about the guarantees of the Bill of Rights and to initiate dialogue about how these rights are applied in their daily lives,” said Claire Gardner, ACLU-TN Community Engagement Associate and conference coordinator. “Conference participants will be empowered to protect and advocate not only for their own civil liberties, but for those of all Tennesseans.”
The conference’s interactive sessions will outline youth rights both in and out of school, discuss how to organize and initiate change, and provide an opportunity for students to network and engage with their peers about the responsibilities of freedom. Specific session topics include free speech, freedom of the press, interactions with law enforcement, religious freedom, tools for creating change, privacy, LGBT equality and more. During concurrent sessions, students will have the opportunity to select the workshops that most interest them.
“As a current high school student, I think it’s really important to understand my civil liberties and civil rights—both in school and beyond—so that I can take an active role in standing up for the changes I want to see in Tennessee. I feel that most students don't fully understand their rights and I hope to increase awareness of student rights,” said Sruthi Madhu, a current high school sophomore and member of ACLU-TN’s youth advisory council, Teens Advocating for Civil Liberties. “I also look forward to meeting other teens at the conference who want to contribute to and change our community for the better.”
Confirmed speakers to date include First Amendment Center Scholar David L. Hudson Jr.; Vanderbilt Law Professor Terry Maroney; Metro Nashville Public Schools School Resource Officer D’Mitri Cannon; Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network of Middle Tennessee Co-Chair Brad Palmertree; American Center for Outreach Board Member Kasar Abdulla, and ACLU-TN Executive Director Hedy Weinberg. Additionally, Lenoir City English teacher James Yoakley, who made national news for helping his students fight censorship in their school newspaper and yearbook, will speak about freedom of the press.
The conference will take place at the Martin Professional Development Center, 2400 Fairfax Avenue, Nashville. The conference is for high school students only. Registration is from 9:30-10:00 a.m. on the day of the conference. The program will begin at 10:00 a.m. and conclude at 3:30 p.m. Lunch and snacks will be provided free of charge.
While there is no cost to attend, students must pre-register for the conference online here or by calling the ACLU-TN office at (615) 320-7142.
The conference is being offered in collaboration with Metro Nashville Public Schools Community Achieves Program, which coordinates community intersession opportunities for students over school breaks. The conference is open to students from other school districts and private schools as well.
ACLU-TN is the only statewide organization dedicated to protecting and promoting the constitutional guarantees of the Bill of Rights. An affiliate of the national ACLU, ACLU-TN is a private, non-profit, non-partisan membership organization.
More information can be found at www.aclu-tn.org.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryJan 2025
Free Speech
We're Fighting Back Against Efforts to Intimidate Professors into SilenceWe're Fighting Back Against Efforts to Intimidate Professors into Silence
A SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suit brought against Columbia professors who criticized the school’s response to student protests is a classic – and unlawful – way to weaponize our legal system to punish and silence constitutionally-protected speech. The ACLU is back in court to protect our right to free speech. -
Press ReleaseJan 2025
Free Speech
ACLU Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit Challenging Protected Speech at Columbia UniversityACLU Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit Challenging Protected Speech at Columbia University
NEW YORK – A faculty organization at Columbia University filed a motion today to dismiss a lawsuit targeting it for public comments about the university’s response to campus protests last spring. The Columbia University chapter of the American Association of University Professors (Columbia-AAUP) is represented by the ACLU and civil rights law firm Wang Hecker, LLP. Columbia-AAUP is one of 21 defendants named in a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit filed on behalf of five anonymous current and former Columbia students, who allege that Columbia-AAUP's public statements about student protests injured them by causing Columbia to move classes online, restrict access to campus, and cancel commencement. SLAPP suits weaponize the legal system to punish and silence constitutionally protected speech. They have become a common tool for intimidating and silencing criticism—including from whistleblowers, journalists, and political protestors—by threatening defendants with costly and lengthy litigation. Several states, including New York, have strong anti-SLAPP laws that protect defendants from meritless suits by forcing the plaintiff to prove “substantial basis” for their claims for the lawsuit to proceed. “This lawsuit is precisely the type of vindictive and meritless action that anti-SLAPP laws are designed to dismiss and deter,” said Scarlet Kim, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “Our client spoke publicly on matters of immense public concern, to defend students’ right to free speech and to condemn Columbia’s punitive response. To suggest that this speech somehow caused Columbia to cancel in-person classes or commencement is ludicrous. It’s obvious that the intent of this lawsuit is not to ameliorate harm, but to shame, punish, and chill our client’s speech. We will not allow our client to be bullied into silence, simply because the plaintiffs didn’t like what it had to say.” Columbia-AAUP's statements about the student protests warned that Columbia’s treatment of student protestors threatened to usher in an era “of repressed speech, political restrictions on academic inquiry, and punitive discipline against the university’s own students and faculty.” Other defendants named in the suit include students, student groups, non-profit organizations, and elected officials. “This suit strikes at the very heart of higher education,” said Reinhold Martin, president of Columbia-AAUP. “Suing a faculty organization for protected speech, especially about university affairs, targets free speech and academic freedom as such. For decades, Columbia’s campus has proudly hosted protest, dissent, and debate; it is this very history that we aim to preserve by dismissing this frivolous action. We are confident that the courts will not allow this type of abusive lawsuit to erode the culture of free expression that defines higher education.” If the ACLU prevails on the motion to dismiss, New York’s anti-SLAPP law will grant attorney's fees to our client and dismiss the lawsuit. The ACLU has also further sought sanctions against plaintiffs' counsel for bringing such a frivolous action. The brief can be viewed here. -
U.S. Supreme CourtJan 2025
National Security
+2 Issues
TikTok Inc., et al. v. Garland (Amicus)TikTok Inc., et al. v. Garland (Amicus)
The Supreme Court will decide whether a law that effectively bans TikTok in the United States violates the First Amendment rights of more than 170 million Americans who use the social media platform. The law also allows the President to ban other foreign-owned apps deemed a national security threat, opening the door to future abuse and censorship. The ban on TikTok is set to go into effect on January 19, 2025.
