As House Narrowly Adopts Bill to Allow Federally Funded Discrimination, ACLU Calls on Senate to Once Again Protect Civil Rights
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Media@dcaclu.org
WASHINGTON - As the House narrowly passed legislation to permit federally funded religious organizations to discriminate against employees based on their beliefs, the ACLU today called on the Senate to preserve current civil rights protections in federal job-training programs. The ACLU said that House legislation includes unnecessary provisions that will undo key federal protections for potential employees.
""The section of the bill that is of concern is ironically and inappropriately called 'non-discrimination,'"" said Christopher Anders, an ACLU Legislative Counsel. ""That section erodes key civil rights protections against government-funded religious discrimination. Supported by both civil rights and religious groups, these protections were put in place to guarantee that publicly funded religious groups comply with the same civil rights laws that apply to everyone else using federal dollars.""
The Workforce Reinvestment and Adult Education Act (HR 1261), which passed on a 220-to-204 vote, allows religious organizations that receive certain federal job-training funds to discriminate against their employees based on religion. By providing this exemption, the House reversed long-standing protections against discrimination based on religion by recipients of federal job-training funds. These civil rights provisions were first included in federal job-training legislation, sponsored by then-Senator Dan Quayle (R-IN), that was adopted 21 years ago, under a Republican Senate and White House.
Such provisions have not been an obstacle for the numerous religious groups that currently participate in federally funded job-training programs. At a news conference yesterday, Reps. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Chet Edwards (D-TX), Bobby Scott (D-VA) and Barney Frank (D-MA) opposed removing the civil rights provision, pointing to the effective programs that faith-based organizations have implemented with federal dollars while following guidelines.
While the legislation does not have a specific companion bill in the Senate, it seems likely that similar provisions will not be included in the Senate version. Opposition to the Workforce Reinvestment Act parallels concerns raised in the Senate to similar provisions in the President's faith-based initiative, provisions that were ultimately eliminated from the Senate's bill several weeks ago.
""The Senate sent a clear message on this issue - civil rights protections remain vital in federally funded programs,"" Anders said. ""They must uphold these protections when they consider this legislation. We must not reverse our long-held belief that religious groups that receive federal funds must abide by federal non-discrimination laws.""
""This bill is an attempt to solve a problem that doesn't exist,"" Anders added. ""Many religious groups already receive federal job training dollars under the current standards, and do so in a fair and constitutional manner. H.R. 1261 sets a dangerous precedent.""
The ACLU's letter to the House urging opposition to the H.R. 1261 can be found at:
/node/21159
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Religious Liberty
Aclu Moves To Dismiss Lawsuit That Seeks To Punish Non-profit Advocacy Against Religious Activities In Oklahoma Schools. Explore Press Release.ACLU Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit That Seeks to Punish Non-Profit Advocacy against Religious Activities in Oklahoma Schools
OKLAHOMA CITY – Today, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against it by the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE). FFRF sent letters to public schools in Oklahoma objecting to religious activities, prompting State Superintendent Ryan Walters and the Oklahoma Department of Education to file a “SLAPP” suit seeking to punish its constitutionally protected speech. The state’s Department of Education has failed to identify any actual violation of law. “We are proud of the work we are doing to protect the rights of conscience of public school children in Oklahoma,” said Annie Laurie Gaylor, FFRF co-president. “This frivolous lawsuit by Ryan Walters seeks to silence FFRF, and we are not going to allow that to happen.” FFRF is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Oklahoma. This “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation” (SLAPP) seeks to chill the free speech and petition rights of FFRF. SLAPP suits are used to weaponize the legal system to punish and silence constitutionally protected speech. “Advocacy organizations have the right to criticize government policy and push for change,” said Megan Lambert, legal director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. “This lawsuit is just another in a long line of political stunts by OSDE as it seeks to silence and punish dissent. We will vigorously defend FFRF’s First Amendment rights against the Department’s abuse of the legal process.” “Our client has not violated any law by speaking out against religious activities in Oklahoma public schools,” said Vera Eidelman, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “This lawsuit has one goal: to chill our client’s ability to petition the government. This is an abusive legal tactic intended to punish people and organizations for speaking out and fighting back against government policies.” The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The motion can be viewed online here. -
Press ReleaseApr 2025
Religious Liberty
Aclu Urges Supreme Court To Reject Mandatory Opt-outs From Maryland School District’s Inclusive English Language Arts Curriculum. Explore Press Release.ACLU Urges Supreme Court to Reject Mandatory Opt-Outs from Maryland School District’s Inclusive English Language Arts Curriculum
WASHINGTON — The American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Maryland filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court today in Mahmoud v. Taylor, urging the court to reject a challenge to a Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) policy barring opt-outs from its inclusive English Language Arts (ELA) curriculum. Through children’s literature, the ELA curriculum acquaints students with a diversity of viewpoints and people in their community, including LGBTQ peers and their families. The brief argues that, because the “no opt-out” policy is religion-neutral and applies regardless of the reason for objection, the policy should not be analyzed under a “strict scrutiny” legal standard and should instead be subject to a more lenient “rational basis” review, which is easily satisfied in the case. Although MCPS previously allowed opt-outs for any reason from portions of the ELA curriculum featuring storybooks with LGBTQ characters and themes, the growing number of opt-outs proved be disruptive and divisive. Teachers were forced to divert time and resources to create alternative lessons for students who opted out, and many students simply did not attend school at all for the day. In addition, the opt-outs stigmatized LGBTQ students and those with LGBTQ family members. As a result, MCPS properly barred all ELA opt-outs, preventing further disruption to the classroom environment and the educational mission of the ELA curriculum. The decision prompted a group of parents to sue, asserting a violation of their rights under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and other constitutional provisions. “Religious liberty is fundamentally important, but it doesn’t force public schools to exempt students from secular lessons that don’t align with their families’ religious views,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “Mandating opt-outs would wreak havoc on public schools, tying their hands on basic curricular decisions, stoking divisiveness and disruption, and undermining a core purpose of public education — to prepare students to live in our pluralistic society.” “In a time of ever-increasing polarization in our country, exemptions that would require schools to allow children to refuse exposure to materials and curriculum about people from various backgrounds is divisive and harmful,” said Deborah Jeon, legal director for the ACLU of Maryland. “Our education system should be one that embraces differences as an opportunity to foster understanding and bring people together. Anything else would send ripples of censorship across the country, negatively impacting countless communities and children who deserve a balanced education.” -
Press ReleaseApr 2025
Religious Liberty
Oklahoma Faith Leaders, Education Advocates, And Parents Urge Supreme Court To Block Nation’s First Religious Public Charter School. Explore Press Release.Oklahoma Faith Leaders, Education Advocates, and Parents Urge Supreme Court to Block Nation’s First Religious Public Charter School
WASHINGTON, D.C. – A group of Oklahoma faith leaders, public education advocates, and public-school parents – who are among the plaintiffs in a lawsuit to stop Oklahoma’s creation of the nation’s first religious public charter school – today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to protect religious freedom and public education by affirming that charter schools are public schools that must be secular and open to all students. In an amicus brief filed today in Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, the group explained that the Oklahoma Supreme Court correctly ruled last year that Oklahoma’s charter schools are public schools and, as governmental entities, must abide by the U.S. Constitution’s protections for religious freedom and church-state separation. Therefore, the proposed St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, which intends to indoctrinate students in one religion, cannot operate as a public charter school. The amici, which include OKPLAC (the Oklahoma Parent Legislative Advocacy Coalition) and eight Oklahoman taxpayers, are plaintiffs in OKPLAC v. Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board, a separate lawsuit in Oklahoma state court challenging the charter school board’s approval of St. Isidore’s application to become a public school. That case is on hold while the case before the U.S. Supreme Court is being resolved. The plaintiffs in OKPLAC are represented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, Education Law Center, and Freedom From Religion Foundation, with support from Oklahoma-based counsel Odom & Sparks PLLC and J. Douglas Mann. The organizations issued the following statement: “The law is clear: Charter schools are public schools and must be secular and open to all students. The Oklahoma Supreme Court correctly found that the state’s approval of a religious public charter school was unlawful and unconstitutional. We urge the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm that ruling and safeguard public education, church-state separation, and religious freedom for all. “Oklahoma taxpayers, including our clients, should not be forced to fund a religious public school that plans to indoctrinate students into one religion and discriminate against students and staff. Converting public schools into Sunday schools would be a dangerous sea change for our democracy.” In addition to OKPLAC, today’s amicus brief was filed on behalf of Melissa Abdo, Krystal Bonsall, Brenda Lené, Michele Medley, Dr. Bruce Prescott, the Rev. Dr. Mitch Randall, the Rev. Dr. Lori Walke and Erika Wright. The team of attorneys that represents the amici is led by Alex J. Luchenitser of Americans United and includes Luke Anderson of Americans United; Daniel Mach and Heather L. Weaver of the ACLU; Robert Kim, Jessica Levin and Wendy Lecker of Education Law Center; Patrick Elliott of FFRF; Benjamin H. Odom, John H. Sparks, Michael W. Ridgeway, and Lisa M. Mason of Odom & Sparks; and J. Douglas Mann. -
Press ReleaseMar 2025
Religious Liberty
Oklahoma Supreme Court Blocks Superintendent Ryan Walters’ Attempts To Purchase Bibles And Bible-infused Instructional Materials. Explore Press Release.Oklahoma Supreme Court blocks Superintendent Ryan Walters’ attempts to purchase Bibles and Bible-infused instructional materials
Oklahoma City – In a victory for religious freedom, public education and church-state separation, the Oklahoma Supreme Court today temporarily blocked Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters and the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) from spending taxpayer dollars on Bibles and Bible-infused instructional materials. The order came in the lawsuit Rev. Lori Walke v. Ryan Walters, which was filed in October 2024 on behalf of 32 Oklahoma families, teachers and faith leaders. The plaintiffs are represented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Oklahoma Foundation, the Freedom From Religion Foundation and Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law & Justice. The Court’s order temporarily stayed “work on any new request by the OSDE for the purchase of Bibles.” In addition, the order paused work on a request for proposals issued by OSDE on February 21, 2025. This request for proposals sought suppliers for “supplemental instructional materials that effectively integrate the Bible and character education into elementary-level social studies curriculum.” The organizations representing the plaintiffs will continue fighting Walters’ Bible-education mandate and additional filings are expected soon. They issued the following joint statement on the win: “This victory is an important step toward protecting the religious freedom of every student and parent in Oklahoma. Superintendent Ryan Walters has been abusing his power and the court checked those abuses today. Our diverse coalition of families and clergy remains united against Walters’s extremism and in favor of a core First Amendment principle: the separation of church and state.